Swing Architecture Pendulum Analysis

It seems that ideas about "regionalism" have emerged at the beginning of swing architecture pendulum, where the anti-establishment institution took over. In 1940, as modernity (or international style) began to take up the dominant rhetoric in architecture, Mumford published a widely shared view of the region in the 1980s, when the anti-establishment institution (postmodernism) began to take over the new institution: Regional through Lefaivre & Tzonis as well as Frampton. The "transformation" of the world’s incites regional ideas to reappear, because regionalism has always sought the best of both worlds, beginning with Richard Streiter in 1890 who wanted "modernity that would take into account the local medium and the traditions of construction" (Mallgrave 97 ) To Mumford who was interested in architecture that absorbed the comprehensive lessons of science and machine but reconciled with human desires and considered the environment (Mumford 197), to Frampton who wished his critical critical area to "mediate the influence of global civilization with elements derived indirectly from the peculiarities of the place Certain "(Frampton 1983, 22).

In the 1980s, the term "critical regionalism" was published, but not by Frampton, but instead of Alexander Tzonis and Lianne LeFaivre, they coined the term "Dimitris Pikionis," an appropriate
By incorporating new ideas about the environment, and phenomena (through touch) in the conversation, Kenneth Frampton came away from this tendency. This second view has further delineated the relationship of Frampton with the post-modern era; phenomena have become a modernist concept found by the Modernists as a way to resist modernity (Mallgrave 2011, 101), ultimately rooted in the ideas of Gaston Bachelard. Frampton particularly found Martin Heidegger's ideas moving. In 1974, Frampton wrote an article entitled Reading on