Preview

Synopsis Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2410 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Synopsis Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Immortal cells taken by a patient without their consent changed the medical world drastically. Not only was the polio vaccine influenced because of the HeLa cells, but research was also enhanced for cures on different illnesses around the world. How can what seems so unethical turn to be entirely beneficial to our world and our generation? The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks opens up the process of how these famous HeLa cells were discovered, and the story of the woman behind them. It reveals her family’s side of the story and the debate on whether the discovery of HeLa was for profit or altruistic reasons.

Henrietta Lacks always felt like there was something wrong with her. She literally felt like there was a knot in her gut, and all along she was right; there was something horribly wrong with her. She had cancer and it wasn’t long until she grew tumors in various parts of her body. She attended John Hopkins hospital for treatments of radium. During several visits and treatments, small tissue pieces were collected. Not only did doctors take two dime sized pieces of her cervical tissue from her, but also they took them without any consent. Rebecca Skloot, the author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks exposes the history of HeLa, but also the story of Henrietta Lacks and her family. The story examines the HeLa cells discovery, and the ethical debate about taking any body products or parts without consent of the patient. The researchers who wanted the immortal cells wanted it for the reasons to cure cancer. The author goes in great detail about the laws in 1950’s, and that there were none regarding researching without consent. The author argues that the country has always been market based, and that it always will be. Products of all kinds will always be bought and sold. Rebecca Skloot went into great search for Henrietta’s family. She wanted to uncover the woman behind the cells by getting both sides of



Cited: Rebecca Skloot. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Broadway Paperbacks, 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Part two of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks discusses the fate of Henrietta’s cells after she passes away. George Gey, the doctor that originally received Henrietta’s cells without her permission, asks her husband if he can perform an autopsy on Henrietta so that he can gain more knowledge on her cells. He wanted as many of her organs as possible to see if they would grow like the HeLa cells. Day refused at first because he planned on having a funeral, but Dr. Gey insisted that he perform the autopsy and promised to make her body suitable for a funeral.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skloot states on page 130 of her book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, that a doctor named Southam was withholding health information from patients. The reasoning behind Southam holding back the patient's health information is as followed. As Skloot says, “ The deception was for his benefit-- he was withholding information because patients might have refused to participate in his study if they’d known what he was injecting.” (Skloot 130) I believe with the information and/or the evidence given to me by Skloot that the rest of the excerpt is relevant and sufficient to support her claim.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the cover photo Henrietta has her hands on her hips and has not yet reached the ago of 30. She is oblivious to the tumor slowly growing inside her and that she will soon leave 5 children motherless, and lead scientific breakthroughs for decades. The photographer is unknown, yet the picture itself has been in various media. Months before she died cells were cut from her cervix. There are many, many HeLa cells in labs today, an inconceivable number intact. Henrietta died in 1951 from cervical cancer. Before she died a surgeon took samples from her tumor and put them in a petri dish. Her cells reproduced a new generation every 24 hours, the first immortal cells every in a lab. Her cells helped scientists find new ways to treat cancer, herpes, influenza, and Parkinson's. Her cells have become the standard in labs. HeLa cells have been reproducing since 1951. There was little information about Henrietta prior to this book. The family was angry that cells were being sold for $25.00 a vile. They are also angry that they can barely afford health care when the people who took the cells became rich off of them.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third section of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was about the journey of Deborah and the author, Rebecca Skloot finding information about her mother’s cells and sister, Elsie. Elsie was forgotten by her family because she was sent away to an insane asylum. Doctors diagnosed Elsie with idiocy, which was caused by Henrietta’s condition with syphilis. Doctors in the Crownsville Hospital conducted research on some of the patients without any consent. This was another example of doctors taking advantage of black patients, similar to Henrietta. The Lacks family had trouble trusting any white reporter or scientist because they were only interested their mother’s cells.The author had to express her intentions for the novel to Deborah that…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the children suffered from this but Henrietta’s youngest child, Joe, who had suffered the most from their current living conditions. Shortly after Henrietta’s death, Joe became a troubled child who is always finding ways to get himself into trouble. Rebecca continued to explore Henrietta’s heritage, noticing that though her family was descended from white plantation owners and enslaved women, the clan were strictly divided into white Lackses and black Lackses, who never mix. A man under the name Chester Southam, injected HeLa and different cancer cells into patients without their knowledge. He became well known for his unethical practices. This process was officially banned by the New York Medical Board of Regents. The case then started a debate over questions of medical consent. As this conflict raged on, HeLa became far more widespread, contaminating hundreds of other cell…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) "Though no one had told Henrietta that TeLinde was collecting samples or asked if she wanted to be a donor – Wharton picked up a sharp knife and shaved two dime-sized pieces of tissue from Henrietta’s cervix" (pg. 33). Lacks's cells have been an immense help to the medical world, but even with that, it was not justifiable to remove her cells without her knowing. It was wrong for Dr. Lawrence Wharton, Jr. to remove the tissue from Lack because she was not given informed consent about the removal of her cells; therefore, preventing her from making an autonomous decision. According to Kant, it is vital to treat people as means rather than ends (powerpoint slide 2). It may be argued that it was justifiable to remove a sample of tissue from Lacks because they have played a key role in many medical breakthroughs;…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebecca Skloot’s, The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks, resurrects the untold journey of HeLa cells and their source through the relaying research conducted by Skloot, effectively awakening the prevailing ethical issues associated with human experimentation and organ donation, which in essence reflects the bigotry and ongoing prejudice of African Americans during the 1950s. Skloot successfully crafts the novel, vigorously resuscitating the painful story of the Lacks’ through the several interviews she conducts. To begin with, for over 60 years, the cells of Henrietta Lacks have been the saviors of innumerable amounts of lives. Henrietta’s cells, commonly known as HeLa cells, were taken without her acknowledgment while being treated for cervical cancer. Dissimilar to…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks is about a poor black woman whose white doctors took her cervical cells on February 1,1951 without her knowledge and used it to consort a DNA research. The DNA research resulted in the discovering of polio vaccine. The “polio vaccine” has produced billions of dollars which has profited the researches, private institutes and was a cure to many diseases but unfortunately Henrietta’s family has no knowledge of this and benefited nothing ,and was still struggling in poverty.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was able to listen to a podcast called famous tumors. It talked about many different types of rare case tumors. Such as president Ulysses S. Grant, Tasmanian devils, a man with a safety pin, a nun and God, and a lady and her daughter.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Stacie Bloom was surprised at how much she enjoyed reading The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. She assumed the book would be “beneath her”. After all, what could a book about HeLa cells written for the layperson teach an accomplished Director of Science (at the NY Academy of Sciences) with an extensive background in cell and molecular biology (that she didn’t already know)? Already somewhat familiar with Skloot’s reputation as a science writer for the NY Academy of Sciences, Bloom decided to give the book a chance. She discovered a narrative that both “amazed” and excited her. The story focused on the back-story of HeLa cells by interweaving a narrative between “Henrietta Lacks”, a poor African American mother with five small children, and the cancerous cells that wreaked havoc on her body. These cells had the rare “heartiness” required to survive in culture, resulting in the first robust human cell line. The consequence of this “immortality” would change…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think in today’s society, scientists are constantly pushing on the ethical line to make or save as much money as possible. Dr. Gey taking Henrietta’s cells, for example, was an effort to save time and money. Although he may not have directly been thinking of it that way at the time, getting Henrietta’s consent may have been impossible because she didn’t trust the doctors office, or it would have taken more time to explain what he wanted to do and why. Still though, with the cultural and social situation of the time, some people believe it was acceptable to take Henrietta’s cells without her knowledge. If it’s okay to take someone’s cells, regardless of the time period, then does that make it okay for a doctor to give someone cells or diseases…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hela Cells

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the nonfiction book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot argues that the Lacks family should be compensated for the exploited use of Henrietta’s Cells. It is unfortunate that the Lacks family did not know that research was being done on Henrietta’s cells, which made the family feel like they were betrayed by doctors at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, but it was a common practice of doctors in the 1950s and consent was not required for research as it is today. Also, it is unfair that Samuel Reader and Monroe Vincent, the founders of Microbiological associates, a cell distribution company, made millions off of selling HeLa cells. However, it is evident that just because a family felt like they were being cheated by doctors and related to Henrietta, they should not receive compensation since they made no scientific contribution to the medicines and technologies created from the use of the HeLa cells. The research done on these cells makes it apparent that if the Lacks family knew that researchers were using Henrietta’s cells, researches would not have been able to find cures for epidemics that killed millions of people.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main themes in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is justice. I feel this is so because Henrietta along with her family were not well-aware that Henrietta's cells were being taken from her without her consent to use in scientific research while she was only seeking help for her unknown illness. Alongside being unaware, she was never fully recognized for her unknown contributions to the scientific research that involved her cells. The fact that someone who has things taken from them and they are unaware of it is huge injustice to anyone.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documented definition of a person is very ambiguous. Merriam-Webster defines a person as “a human being”. This answer leaves much to the imagination, particularly with the case of Henrietta Lacks and her cells. After I analyzed this prompt, I reached a conclusive definition: a person should be referred to as “one who has a lucid connection between physical self and self identity. A being without any self awareness or comprehension of the psychology of humankind cannot be constituted as a person.” Personhood is made up of key elements including perception of human nature and conscious knowledge of one's own character, feelings, motives, and desires.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the text it states,"when Southham began injecting people with HeLa cells in 1994, there was no formal research oversight in the united states. Since the turn of the century, politicians had been introducing state and federal laws with hopes of regulating human experimentation, but physicians and researchers always protested. The bill was repeatedly voted down for fear of interfering with the progress of science, even though other countries-including, ironically, Prussia-had enacted regulations governing human research as early as 1891,'' The researchers them selves made it seem okay to test on a human without consent for the sake of science. southham stated he did it for everyone so what he was saying was its okay to harm one person for everyone else's benefit but if we asked that we would be crossing to a new territory of the value of one life compared to millions, but that was the counter argument southham…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays