First, in the article sex is defined …show more content…
It describes the direct action that is happening when one expressed themselves sexually. “Femininity and masculinity are regarded as prototypes of essential expression- something that can be conveyed fleetingly in any social situation and yet something that strikes at the most basic characterization of the individual” (west, 129). In the article it made a note of how those that are “doing gender” should with this subject of gender also cause for mistreatment and sometimes misjudgment from others. This is what can possibly happen when people do gender inappropriately. The article describes that those that are inappropriate with gender may be called to account for their character, motives, and predispositions. For a person who “does gender” they express themselves freely in doing so it is there role to master the felinity and masculinity. When inappropriately doing gender, it could be the act of acting in a flamboyant wat that may be offensive to the eye on initial perception. There is always a conscience of what is right in wrong, or out of the ordinary. This also works to maintain the power structure of the men. A lot of actions and rules are made or were first established at the hand of a man. A true man doesn’t want to see trans-women or mistakenly find interest in women to yet find out they are a man. This is somewhat a trigger discussion for most heterosexuals. This maintains the power structure of