Half of the prose demonstrate raw pain, and the other half are devoid of emotion. By living through those awesome moments the author lost something of himself in those ten years. With each passing horrible event he quiets, soon the reader too finds himself becoming numb. One must be very wary as his message becomes muddled! Thomas L. Friedman wrote this historical diary of his memories to preserve the importance of the real life rather than just the politics of it, yet his pain in his biography leave a profound effect that dulls the pain with each additional account of violence. This leaves the novel light, and superficial. Further, it leaves the readers with feeling they watched a 6 hour news broadcast, resulting in feeling that they can’t care anymore, like the Beirutis, the readers must protect themselves, drown out the pain, and move…
It is important to understand that some conflicts in literature might not always be obvious. Considering how an author addresses conflict via literary techniques can reveal other more complex conflicts or different kinds of conflicts that interact in multiple ways. Analyzing those more complicated elements can help discover what literature represents about the human experience and condition. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the poem of Juan Delgado and the story of Tim O’Brien.…
In the novel Vineland, Thomas Pynchon, exposes corruption within government agencies misusing their power in order to benefit their own parties’ interest as seen in American citizens’ public life from the 1960s to the 1980s. Brock Vond, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Intelligence) agent and federal prosecutor who operates throughout this whole period, relies on his connections with various government agencies to set-up civilians in order to prosecute them later on. Brock Vond's fascism mirrors President Richard Nixon’s repressive term of office with manipulation of citizens, abusive police power, and over-zealous drug raids. In Political Repression in Modern America From 1870 to 1976, Robert Justin Goldstein explains Nixon’s abusing the intelligence agencies as a form of political repression triggered by dissenters. In the article, “The War on Drugs: How President Nixon Tied Addiction to Crime”, Emily Dufton describes how Nixon shifts America’s perception that withholding drugs are illegal, which enforces the creation of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), an organization that investigates and prosecutes anybody who possesses drugs. As an authoritative figure, Vond abuses his power to justify his actions in order to get what he wants. Many citizens in the text, such as Frenesi, members of the PR3, and Zoyd, are affected by Vond’s intentions and actions. All the events in the text depict real life events as seen through every government agency’s prosecuting a character.…
Carolyn Forche’s “The Colonel” instantly catches the eye. The poem was written in 1978 while Forche was working in El Salvador, and retails a merciless meeting with its title character. The Colonel is a hard man in a violent world, and he cares not for the rights of the people he governs nor the fact that he is exposing his evil nature to a poet: as he says, “something for your poetry, no?” (Forche, 597). The poem reinforces this effect through its stark irony and short poetic flourishes, its outer appearance, and the length and terseness of its sentences. The Colonel is about as subtle and friendly as a brick wall, and thus the poem about him looks like one. The intent of the “The Colonel” is to describe the nature of this brutal…
The Cold War was a tough period in American History. Families constantly living in fear over what might happen next. Kurt Vonnegut lived through out the time period of the Cold War. In that time he wrote many pieces of work, one of which is “Harrison Bergeron.” This short story takes place in America 2081, where everyone is “equal.” Vonnegut relates his work back to the Cold War and the threat of Communism by using the symbolism of handicaps and total government control.…
These persuasive criticisms are shown in various passages, such as from one civilian who states, “I don't blame them, the government, the people who were supposed to protect us… No, I don't blame them for wanting to divert us, I can forgive that. But the irresponsible way they did it, the lack of vital information that would have helped so many to stay alive… that I can never forgive” (Brooks 122). His criticisms of the government’s supposed incompetence can be observed through his portrayed politician’s motives and irresponsibility. Some resounding connections can be made from the novel to how we as a society try to advocate for lasting change and…
The "Harrison Bergeron" story written, by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., is a portrayal of a much imagined world where equality exists among all people. It is a seemingly nice notion, but at what price? Equality comes to the people from an amendment to the constitution, enforced by the government's right to control all human intelligence, strength and ability. Although the story was written in 1961, the author projects the time period to the year 2081. It is with single-mindedness that the government attempts to achieve its goal of handicapping the American society. Told from third person point of view, this story gives us an account from the outside looking in.…
There are similarities and difference between “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut and “‘Repent, Harlequin!’ Said the Ticktockman” by Harlan Ellison.…
Comparing texts forces us to question our values in the context of the author’s zeitgeist and our own. The dystopia novel The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), written by Margaret Atwood, and the film adaptation Children of Men (2006), directed by Alfonso Cuarón, both examine the abuse of power by totalitarian government regimes which come about as a result of chaotic disasters. These oppressive governments’ abuse of their given power creates a dystopic world, and with it come restrictions to individual freedom. By viewing the two texts together, we are able to gain a greater understanding of the composer’s context.…
To begin, the protagonist in each text is set in the role of the outsider. Both Nunez and ‘T’ complete a major change in both their plot and development. There are evident contrasts in the way in which both of these characters transform; this enables us to juxtapose both text and protagonist in the way these outsiders importantly redound on the story line and the other characters. In Nunez we see a strong character, who historicism critics could view him as a powerful country in demise given the political circumstance of the time, whose own dominance gradually weakens. In sharp contrast ‘T’ is the brooding, malevolent personification of a post World War II generation that has never witnessed peace and calm, wanting nothing but to inflict more of the devastation that he is used to. ‘T’ has a revolutionary idealism that gradually gains momentum as the plot unfolds with striking similarities to the great revolutionaries of the time. Both protagonists have completely different settings into which they are able to influence the plot. The calm and tranquil backdrop in ‘The Country of the Blind (TCotB, 1904)’ is in direct contrast to the apocalyptic post blitz scene in ‘The Destructors (TD, 1954)’. These differences force ‘T’ and Nunez to impact on plot development and structure in very different ways.…
Six years after Poland was invaded by Nazi Germany, Victory in Europe was declared. But with the fall of the Nazis, a new enemy of the West appeared—the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union, or the USSR, was a Marxist-Leninist state with a highly centralized government and economy, that through its one-party, the Communist Party, promised social and economic equality for all. But the Red State did not fulfill its promises, with Soviet Premiers like Stalin killing millions of its citizens. It truly seemed as though Marxism, as it was practiced in the Soviet Union, was nothing but equality in social and economic misery for all. It is perhaps because of the USSR’s interpretation of Marxism that Kurt Vonnegut was inspired to write his short story Harrison…
Through viewing the connections and similarities between Art Spiegelman’s “MAUS” and George Orwell’s “Homage to Catalonia” at the individual level, we enhance our understanding of fascism, war, and resistance. Regardless of the obvious differences in the times of these works, they both help give us readers a greater grasp on the history of these wars from real first hand accounts. From the stories of Art’s father, Vladek, and the journeys of George Orwell, we are given new light on powerful dictators, emotional instability, and the human will to survive.…
The fact that we are born without a choice, that we are expected to rise into being from a one celled organism to man without any external doubts is a perpetual theme to existence. Doubt is a threat, a precarious uncertainty that looms over every deed, making the daily reality of one persons life unreal. Sources of information, like the media, can make your head spin with fear, giving the viewer a new neurosis for the day. It happens to us all, when you find out a pedophile lives next door this whole time, or to realize your block offers under aged prostitutes, or in fact there NEVER was weapons of mass destruction. Paradigm shifts are frightening for they highlight the infinite discrepancies in our perceptions that have been there the whole time. We don't want to be ignorant, but we also desire to be safe and comfortable. Like a bad acid trip, if we know to much at once, or accept all the motives for our flawed behavior simultaneously we are prone to “freak out”. In these three pieces the characters undergo a shift of perception that may destroy or strengthen them. The three tales are “That in Aleppo once...” by Vladimir Nabokov, “Janus” by Ann Beatie and “The Killers” by Ernest Hemingway.…
Alexander Solzhenitsyn revolutionized the world of literature; he changed it from being about simply telling a story or just reiterating facts to exposing the truth and hoping to change the world. This began when Solzhenitsyn spoke out against the Russian government and was then sent to a prison camp in Siberia. He wrote about his experience in prison, and this was the first time anyone found out what was happening in the prison camps. Solzhenitsyn realized since no one knew about the cruelty in the prison camps, the violence kept taking place. But by him exposing the truth, he drew attention to the prison camps and stopped the violence. This then became his philosophy, that it was an author’s job to point out the lies and ills of the government, and then the lies and violence will stop. He made that clear in his speech for the Nobel Prize; he also stressed the importance of reading literature from different nations. He said that it allows people to understand different cultures and different backgrounds. The books and works that we have read in class, such as In Time of the Butterflies, Inspector General, Things Fall Apart, and Kite Runner help up to Solzhenitsyn’s standard because they exposed the faults in their governments and allowed the readers to gain more perspective about their history and culture.…
Cited: Vonnegut, Kurt. “Harrison Bergeron.” Brave New Worlds. Ed. John Joseph Adams. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Night Shade Books, 2012. Web. 1 Sept. 2013.…