Tajuk

Using a conceptual framework in setting accounting standards

Ian Dennis

Business School
Oxford Brookes University

Abstract

The paper examines the nature and role of a conceptual framework for financial reporting. Although much has been written about such frameworks and their purported role and the FASB and IASB are currently revising and converging their frameworks there are still questions about the kind of thing it is and how it is used in setting accounting standards. Using insights from the philosophical literature this paper considers the nature of the statements that appear in the chapters of the conceptual framework on objectives and qualitative characteristics. It then considers how these statements are used by standard setters in reasoning towards accounting standards. The kind of reasoning involved and the type of statements that are used in such reasoning is examined. The idea that some of the statements in the conceptual framework express desires that are to be fulfilled by financial reporting regulated by accounting standards is explored. These should be conceived as expressing general desires that are used in practical or instrumental reasoning towards accounting standards rather than as universal desires that enable the deduction of such standards. The need for the exercise of judgement in such reasoning is explored. The nature of the other statements in the conceptual framework is ambiguous. They are sometimes taken to be empirical statements about how the desires are to be fulfilled and sometimes taken as statements about the meaning of expressions used to express these desires. The paper suggests that the development of the conceptual framework would be easier and the final product would have more credibility if its nature and role was more clearly understood.

Key words: Conceptual framework; instrumental reasoning; judgement; objectives; qualitative characteristics.

Contact address:

Dr Ian Dennis
Senior Lecturer in

References: Anscombe, G.E.M., 1957. Intention. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Archer, S., 1993. On the methodology of constructing a conceptual framework for financial accounting. M. Mumford and K. Peasnell (edd.) Philosophical Perspectives on Accounting. Routledge, London. ASB, 1999, Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting. Accounting Standards Board Ltd, London. Baker, G., Hacker, P., 1980. Wittgenstein Meaning and Understanding. Blackwell, Oxford. Barth, M., 2007. Standard-setting measurement issues and the relevance of research. Accounting and Business Research, Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum, 7-15. CICA, 1988. Professional Judgment in Financial Reporting. CICA, Toronto. Craig, E. (ed.), 2005. The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge, Abingdon. Davidson, D., 1980. Actions, Reasons and Causes. In Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Dopuch, N. & Sunder, S., 1980. FASB’s Statements on Objectives and Elements of Financial Accounting: A Review. Accounting Review 55(1), 1-21. FASB, 2002. Proposal: Principles-Based Approach to U.S. Standard Setting. FASB, Connecticut. FASB/IASB, 2005. Revisiting the Concepts: A New Conceptual Framework Project. FASB, Connecticut. FASB, 2010. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts 8. FASB, Connecticut. Gore, P., 1992. The FASB Conceptual Framework Project 1973-1985. Manchester University Press, Manchester. Hacker, P.M.S., 1996. Wittgenstein Mind and Will Part I Essays. Blackwell, Oxford. Hare, R.M., 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Hines, R.D., 1989. Financial accounting knowledge, conceptual framework projects and the social construct of the accounting profession. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2(2), 72-92. IASB, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IASB, London. ICAS, 2006. Principles not rules A question of judgment. ICAS, Edinburgh. Kant, I., 1785. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Reprinted in and translated by Paton, H.J., 1948. Lemmon, E.J., 1965. Beginning Logic. Nelson University Paperbacks, London. Littleton, A.C., 1938. Tests for Principles, Accounting Review, March 1938, 16-24. Mattesich, R., 1995. Conditional-Normative Accounting Methodology: Incorporating Value Judgements and Means-End Relations of an Applied Science. Accounting, Organizations and Society Vol.20 No.4, 259-284. Paton, H.J., 1948. The Moral Law. Hutchinson University Library, London. Power, M., 1993. On the idea of a conceptual framework for financial reporting. M. Mumford and K. Peasnell (edd.) Philosophical Perspectives on Accounting, Routledge, London. Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Salmon, W., 1992. Scientific Explanation. In Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis. Schipper, K., 2003. Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons 17 (1), 61-72. SEC, 2003. Study Report Pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SEC. Skinner, 1995/2005. Judgment in Jeopardy. First published in CA Magazine, November 1995 and reprinted in Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 2005, Vol. 4, No. 2, 143-152. Wittgenstein, L., 1958. Philosophical Investigations, (2nd ed.). Basil Blackwell, London. Young, J., 2006. Making up users. Accounting Organizations and Society 31, 579-600 -----------------------