The idea of work not being a necessity in life sounds a little out there. It would take a lot of convincing to sway anyone. …show more content…
Roszak’s utilizes parallelism in a very effective fashion. In a section of the article Roszak begins to explain what jobs are not needed. “Work that produces unnecessary consumer junk or weapons of war is wrong and wasteful. Work that is built upon false needs or unbecoming appetites is wrong and wasteful. Work that deceives or manipulates, that exploits or degrades is wrong and wasteful. Work that wounds the environment or makes the world ugly is wrong and wasteful” (369). Wrong and wasteful. The repetition of this phrase creates a relay in a person’s mind. Wrong and wasteful. Wrong and wasteful. Roszak takes the problem he sees and turns it into a face that the audience can remember. Applying parallelism to the problem really makes it stick out to the reader. The If Roszak would not have used parallelism in this part of the