MGT 210
Tanglewood Case #5
1a. Yes, the evidence does prove that disparate impact discrimination is present.
Historical Hiring and Promotion Data: Applicant Flows
Occupational category
Total
White*
Total
Non-White
African-
American*
Store Associates
External hires
Applicants
18023
15193
2830
595
Hires
4145
3464
681
143
Selection ratio
23.00%
22.80%
24.06% 1.05
24.03% 1.05
Shift leader
External hires
Applicants
403
331
72
17
Hires
64
54
10
1
Selection ratio
15.88%
16.31%
13.89% 0.85 5.88% 0.36 Internal hires
Applicants
872
715
157
36
Hires
276
232
44
5
Selection ratio
31.65%
32.45%
28.02% 0.86
13.89%
0.43
Department manager
External hires
Applicants
1242
1074
168
44
Hires
94
82
12
3
Selection ratio
7.57%
7.63%
7.14%
0.93
6.82%
0.89
Internal hires
Applicants
589
509
80
21
Hires
124
108
16
3
Selection ratio
21.05%
21.22%
20.00%
0.94
14.29%
0.67
Asst. store manager
External hires
Applicants
144
120
24
6
Hires
16
16
0
0
Selection ratio
11.11%
13.33%
0.00%
0.00% Internal hires
Applicants
108
90
18
4
Hires
27
25
2
1
Selection ratio
25.00%
27.78%
11.11%
0.40
0.25%
0.01
Store Manager
External hires
Applicants
48
39
9
2
Hires
5
3
2
0
Selection ratio
10.42%
7.69%
22.22%
0.00%
Internal hires
Applicants
81
66
15
4
Hires
13
9
4
0
Selection ratio
16.05%
13.64%
26.67%
1.96
0.00%
0.00
*Non-Hispanic
1b. Yes, there is a concentration of white employees in upper management positions.
Historical Concentration Data
Occupational category
Total
White*
Total
Non-White
African-
American*
Store Associates
Employees
2760
2307
453
95
Concentration
X
83.59%
16.41%
3.44%