Preview

TATA CORUS

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2047 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
TATA CORUS
IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 11, Issue 1 (May. - Jun. 2013), PP 41-47 www.iosrjournals.org An Analysis of the Impact of Merger and Acquisition of Corus by
Tata Steel
Manoj Kumara N V 1, Dr. Satyanarayana2
1

(Doctoral Student, Department of Post Graduate Studies in Management Sciences,Maharaja Research foundation. University of Mysore, India)
2
(HOD and Professor, Department of Post Graduate Studies in Management Sciences,Maharaja Institute of
Technology. Mysore, India)

Abstract: Merger and Acquisition have became exclusive trend in steel industry globally since the beginning of the 21st century. Corporate integration in the corporate world is accomplishing significance and concentration especially with an exciting undertaking of intense globalization. This is the clear evidence from the importance and increasing growth of deal values and resulted with more corporate integration in recent times. These studies examine the key motive drivers and evaluate the impact of mergers and acquisition in steel industry on event study approach. This event study focused on Tata steel – Corus Acquisition during the year
2007. The study used a published financial statement which consists of secondary data. The financial statements are analysed and tested by using correlation co-efficient and t- test. The outcome of the analysis disclosed that there is a significant difference between pre – post merger and acquisition in capital base and level of returns.
There is a significant difference between pre – post merger and acquisition EPS. The finding of this study evolves those synergies, increased capitalization with the proof of changes in returns, profitability based on the research findings. It can be summarized that the corporate integration has increase the organizational performance also contributed to the growth of the steel industry.
Keywords – Mergers and Acquisitions,



References: Acharya,Ram,C, the impacts of merger and acquisition on firms profitability, a case study of Canadian firms. Journal of Finance ,, volume 4, 2000, 1605-1621. Hitt.M, Harrison.J and Best.A, attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisition of US firms, British Journal of Management,9(2, 1998, 91-114). [11] Ross, Westerfield and Jaffee, Corporate finance (6th edition, Boston: Mcgraw-Hill/Ervin, 2002). Harward Business Reviews , mergers and acquisitions(Boston, HB SchoolPress,MA02163) www.iosrjournals.org

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Lubatkin, M. (1983), ``Mergers and the performance of the acquiring firm ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 218-25. Retrieved 2012-02-03…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dominant value creating function is the main reason for the firm engagement in inorganic growth. Through this mode of growth, the firm improved the value of shareholders since the power and efficiency of the merged companies are better than the individual companies working separately. As a result, the value was captured in the anticipated synergies where the results of these mergers were evident based on the accelerated growth in revenues, profits, and assets. In addition, the mergers, especially the merger between world com and MCI, brought together two firms that have complementary strengths and assets (Hitt & Harrison, 2001). Through these mergers, the shareholders’ value was improved through operational cost reduction including, the reduction in reduced leased lined costs, and elimination of expensive terminal charges both locally and internationally. Also, the mergers eliminated duplication of activities and investments, adoption of best practices while sales and marketing forces have meshed thus making the established market channel to be better established. Moreover, the mergers and acquisitions helped the firm minimize the competition in the market, instantly add new brands to the firm’s product portfolio, instant access to fresh customer base and expansion to new geographical locations, gaining economies of scale over a reduced period of time, injection of new and diversified management skills and significant reduction of time to market thus giving the firm the competitive advantage (Gaughan, 2013). All these merger outcomes are value-adding since they enable merger process meet the characteristic of the value adding…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sudarsanam, P.S. (2003) Creating value form mergers and acquisitions: The challenges, an integrated and international perspective. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall, 2003…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mergers and acquisitions commonly occur when it is felt that the existing synergies between two organisations can enable them to work with greater efficiencies if they act together, than what they can achieve if they operate on their own. Such synergies can arise from a number of reasons, the more important of which arise from the combined ability of the merging organisations to exploit scale economies, reduce work duplication, share managerial, technological, and knowledge resources, and raise greater amounts of funds. Mergers are also motivated by the desire of firms to retain or increase market share or power. Apart from such reasons, M & A activity occurs because of strategic objectives associated with diversification, exploitation of new markets, spreading of risks, and maximisation of value.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Mergers and acquisitions are formed in the hope that they will create value and there is a vast amount of reasoning on why they have been introduced. Businesses will try and create value for the company, shareholders, customers and employees. The present value of all performance enhancements attributable to management change would result in the increase in value from just by managing the assets more efficiently (Damodaran, 2005).…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Mergers and acquisitions have become a growing trend for companies to inorganically grow a business within its particular industry. There are many goals that companies may be looking to achieve by doing this, but the main reason is to guarantee long-term and profitable growth for their business. Companies have to keep up with a rapidly increasing global market and increased competition. With the struggle for competitive advantage becoming stronger and stronger, it is almost essential to achieve these mergers. Through research I will attempt to dissect the best practices for achieving merger success.…

    • 3233 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communication Plan

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Even though, Mergers is an aspect of business strategy aimed to help grow a business, it can damage management in target organizations. In a study conducted by Krug, et al. (2008), it has been found that organizations lost 21 percent of top leadership each year for at least 10 years after the deal. This turnover is expected if the line of production of both emerging companies overlap.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a broad-spectrum, mergers and takeovers (or acquisitions) are very alike to corporate measures - they unite two formerly unique separate firms into a sole legal entity. Considerably operational returns can be achieved when the two companies are pooled together and, in actuality, the target of nearly all mergers and acquisitions is to progress the company performance and shareholder value over the long-term.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arcelor-Mittal Case Study

    • 4189 Words
    • 17 Pages

    CASE STUDY ARCELOR-MITTAL MERGER: CHALLENGING INTEGRATION OF TWO STEEL GIANTS’ ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITIES Preamble In the aftermath of one of this century's most remarkable mergers, we find two different cultures, two different worlds, thrown into one of history's largest corporate integrations. On the one hand, there is Mittal Steel - the largest producer of steel in terms of volume. Despite the fact that Mittal steel is based in Netherlands, it is perceived that the company is non-European because its CEO Lakshmi Mittal is Indian. On the other hand, there is Arcelor - headquartered in Luxembourg and created through the merger of three steel companies - Aceralia, Arbed and Usinor. In 2005, Arcelor had revenues of 32 billion Euros. Arcelor management was extremely hostile to Mittal Steel’s bid from the beginning because it believed that Arcelor itself would have been doing the acquisitions and not the other way around. Arcelor repeatedly played the patriotic card in order for shareholders to reject the bid. The CEO of Arcelor dismissed Mittal Steel as a “company of Indians” and unworthy of taking over a European company (all this despite the fact that most industry analysts and investment banks pointing out that the deal was in Arcelor’s best interests). The French government (despite not being a shareholder) was against the deal because of worries over its 28000 Arcelor employees. Despite repeated assurances from Mittal that the deal would not lead to layoffs the government of France was never convinced. The government of Luxembourg (a stakeholder) was against the deal as well for a variety of reasons. The European Union approved of the Mittal-Arcelor deal. So many questions, so many uncertainties, and only a few months to sort them all out and forge a new identity that will define the future of the steel industry worldwide. Will they succeed? At what cost?…

    • 4189 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mittal Steel began in the early 1970’s as a small, family owned company, based in India. However, due to a range of restrictive government regulations and tough competitiveness from SAIL (a state-owned firm) and Tata Steel (a large privately owned firm), Mittal Steel believed that the best projection of growth of the company would transpire outside of India. In 1975, Mittal Steel began expanding across national borders by creating and building a steel making plant in Indonesia. Mittal Steel was able to expand into different nations through mergers and acquisitions. At the time of Mittal Steel’s foreign expansion, the steel industry was in the midst of a 25-year slump. The 25-year slump caused many companies to go under distress. Lakshmi Mittal (the CEO of Mittal Steel) saw value in the distressed companies and believed that they could be feasible operations through a move toward greater efficiency and with an injection of capital. On the contrary, Greenfield Investment took a different route by building similar operations from the ground up, which was proven to be more costly. By avoiding the start-up-phase, Mittal Steel was able to avoid delay and take advantage of the benefits that come with a recognized market presence. Mittal Steel brings many benefits to the countries that it enters. For instance, its presence in a foreign market is deemed beneficial as it focuses on acquiring distressed companies and ameliorating them. However, it is important to note that that was not the case for Arcelor, Mittal Steel’s most recent acquisition. The management and politicians were opposed the concept of a foreign firm taking over an organization that was important to the European market. Due to the recent global economic crisis, Mittal Steel may…

    • 2455 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Tata & Corus M&a Deal

    • 5900 Words
    • 24 Pages

    of completing the acquisition, there were additional managerial challenges to consider, which frequently arose with this type of venture.…

    • 5900 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neuro Pasta Case Analysis

    • 2591 Words
    • 18 Pages

     Control – Merger will lead to more control to the acquiring managements as they will be…

    • 2591 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merger and acquisition are not new issues. Many international and local studies regarding how mergers and acquisitions could affect firm’s performance had been done. Many studies found out that mergers and acquisitions did not have any significant impact towards firms’ performance. All the findings from these studies are very useful for investors as well as firms’ managements to make decision in future.…

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Tata Steel acquiring Corus throws up several interesting questions on emerging multinationals and traditional multinationals in the steel industry and particularly the complexities of the acquisition in the above context. What has been surprising in the above case is that how could a small steel maker, Tata Steel from a developing country like India buy up a large steel company, Corus PLC from the United Kingdom. Prior to the acquisition, Corus was four times bigger than Tata Steel. However, the operating profit for Tata Steel was $840 million (sale of 5.3 million tonnes), whereas in case of Corus it was $860 million (sale of 18.6 million tones) in the year 2006. It is also interesting to find out why a large global steel maker, Corus decided to sell itself off to a small steel maker from a developing country.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers or amalgamation, result in the combination of two or more companies into one, wherein the merging entities lose their identities. No fresh investment is made through this process. Howeverof shares takes place between the entities involved in such a process. Generally, the company that survives is the buyer which retains its identity and the seller company is extinguished. A merger can also be defined as an amalgamation if all assets and liabilities of one company are transferred to the transferee company in consideration of payment in the form of equity shares of the transferee company or debentures or cash or a mix of the above modes of payment. An acquisition, on the other hand, is aimed at gaining a controlling interest in the share capital of acquired company. It can be enforced through an agreement with the persons holding a majority interest in the company's management or through purchasing shares in the open market or purchasing new shares by private treaty or by making a take-over offer to the general body of shareholders. Joint stock company is the most dominant business form for organised and large industrial and commercial activities. The corporate and industrial sectors are in a sense inseparable as a substantial part of organised industrial activity is conducted by joint stock companies. Questions like what to produce, how much to invest, where to raise finances from, how much to spend on R&D and advertisement, where to get technology from, at what price to sell and in which markets, how to diversify, etc. are decided at company level and not by the factory management. Joint stock companies also undertake a variety of services ranging from transport, distribution, finance, health and media. The corporate sector is important for mobilizing and utilising household savings for making new investments. It is a major recipient as well as supplier of foreign investment.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics