Preview

Teacher and Student Ethical Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teacher and Student Ethical Case Study
The ethical case issue I chose deals with consensual relationships between students and instructors or educators. In my opinion, consensual relationships between the two have been going on for decades. Although colleges and universities have created policies aimed at discouraging or preventing these kinds of relationship, ethical misconduct will probably continue. I can remember my junior college days where consensual relationships, though not excepted, were very common. The question I have is who is victim and who is the villain because, honestly, both student and the instructor initiate consensual relationships. Therefore, it’s fair to explore the pros and cons of this issue. There will always be varied opinions to consensual relationships policies of academic institutions. Some are opposed to consensual relationship policies of any kind. There are those who favor policies that discourage but do not altogether prohibit these relationships. Others favor prohibiting consensual relationships but only in supervisory capacity but may or may not support discouraging consensual relationships in nonsupervisory situations. Finally, there are those who favor policies that prohibit consensual sexual relationships between professors and students under any and all circumstances. As a matter of practicality, those with opinions against any policy response on the part of institutions are probably in the minority. This includes those in favor of prohibiting consensual relationships under any circumstance. A more moderate and popular view proposing that consensual relationships between instructors and students are more or less appropriate depending on the circumstances of the relationship. Those who oppose consensual relationships policies of any kind typically argue that such policies violate individual and constitutional rights to privacy and freedom of association (Alston 1998; Hoffman 1986; Tittle 1997). Therefore, when adult professors and students


References: Alston, Kal. 1998. "Hands Off Consensual Sex. 'Academe 84:32-33. Blevins-Knahe, Belinda. 1992. T h e Ethics of Dual Relationships in Higher Education. ' Ethics & Behavior 2:151-163. Bowman, Vicki, Lesa Hatley, and Robert Bowman. 1995. "Faculty-Student Relationships: The Dual Role Controversy." Counselor Education and Supervision Dank, Barry and Joseph Fulda. 1997. "Forbidden Love: Student-Professor Romances." Sexuality & Culture 1:107-130. Hoffman, Frances L. 1986. "Sexual Harassment in Academia: Feminist Theory and Institutional Practice."Harvard Educational Review 56:105-121. Quatrella, Lucy A. and Diane Keyser Wentworth, 1995, "Students ' Perceptions of Unequal Status Dating Relationships in Academia." Ethics and Behavior 5:249— Tittle, Peg. 1997. "On Prohibiting Relationships Between Professors and Students." Sexuality & Culture 1:131- 149. Zalk, Sue Rosenberg, Judy Dederich, and Michele Paludi. 1991. "Women Students ' Assessment of Consensual Relationships with Their Professors: Ivory Power Nicholas. 1996. "The Morality of Intimate Faculty-Student Relationships." The Monist 79:519-535.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical Case

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cruickshank, Garth & Romano (CGR) is a new real estate appraisal and consulting firm formed by Chris Cruickshank, Wayne Garth, and Richard Romano. The firm provides not only residential, industrial and commercial evaluations, but also consulting services and feasibility analyses in the National Capital Region (NCR). Richard and his two partners have worked for one of the four major NCR firms and are well known in the local real estate community. And recently, Richard has just completed a preliminary evaluation of a property for Watson & Musico, which is one of NCR’s major developers and property owners. However, John Mortimer from Watson & Musico is unsatisfied with the Richard’s evaluation price, he asks Richard to raise the value, otherwise they have no business. This situation is difficult for Richard, because he wants to satisfy John’s needs, but at the same time, he can’t ignore the ethical issue to do that.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If action is based on the principal of need, this patient would receive standard treatment unless a life threatening situation arose. If her need becomes greater or she no longer responds to non invasive treatment then, the need for surgery becomes greater.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the scenario Jerry McCall is Dr. Williams office assistant. Jerry has received training for a medical assistant and licensed practical Nurse. Although Jerry is handling the incoming calls while the receptionist is at lunch a patient of Dr. Williams had called in the office and stated that he needed two refill an antidepressant and Valium right away because he is leaving the airport within 30 minutes. The patient states that Dr. Williams always gives him a small supply of Valium when he goes to fly. Does Jerry have the correct medical training to refill this type of prescription? If it were another type of medication, such as high blood pressure to be ordered to take on daily basis would this make a difference for Jerry to call in the refill? I f Jerry calls in the prescription and the patient has a reaction while flying is Jerry protected from a lawsuit under the doctrine of respondeat superior?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “It depends on how careful they were, if they were there at all. We’re checking on that.”…

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dr. Williams assistant Jerry does have the training but does not have the ability to make a call for a patient because if he prescribed the wrong dosage amount then there will be in trouble with the patient and also with HIPAA. It will not be in the best interest of Jerry to make this call for Dr. Williams without making a call to Dr. Williams first. In order for this to happen without breaking any laws, Jerry needs to have communication with Dr. Williams. To keep the integrity of office Jerry should ensure that the proper medication and make sure that it is the patient’s correct prescription if Dr. Williams gives the okay for jerry to provide the Valium for the patient. This might have to be a medication that this patient have to go without on his trip.…

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consent is now, more than ever, a hot-button topic of conversation. The questions of what is consent, who can give it, and when is it necessary are being played out in courtrooms, the legislature, and the news. The cost of public opinion is loud, fractured, and far from the consensus needed to come reach a verdict. Part of the problem with discussions about topics like consent, are that they are spoken about in a vacuum. When consent is discussed, it is almost exclusively talked about in the context of sex and sexual assault, however, sex is not the only interpersonal interaction around which issues of consent exist.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Medical laws have been put into place to protect not only the patient, but also the physicians, nurses, and medical office staff. The laws were put into place to ensure that these professionals follow the correct procedures and steps that only qualified persons follow. The definition of practicing medicine has also been clearly explained. Those professionals who do not abide by these set laws are therefore subject to punishment by law (Baxter 2005).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics Class Case Study

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The basis in the case of Vo v. City of Garden Grove lies within the debate of what is more important the right of free speech, which is given to all American’s as a right under Article 1 in the Constitutional Amendments, or safety of those using the internet cafes in question. Personal safety is not mentioned in the constitution, but as The United State of America’s second President, John Adams, said in 1798, “our constitution was made only for moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (Joe, 2005). Although the courts sided with the City of Garden Grove, one judge dissented, saying that the decision infringed upon the right to free speech.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Viewpoints

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wilkins, Richard G. "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage." Family in America June 2001: n. pag. Rpt. in Homosexuality. Ed. Helen Cothran. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2003. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 5 May…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralistic Ignorance

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many areas of student behavior might be influenced by pluralistic ignorance. The practice of hooking up and other uncommitted sexual relations have been influenced by pluralistic ignorance. In a 2000 study it was shown that eighty-six percent of men and eighty-eight percent of women hooked up during their college careers. This process of hooking up has become normative in recent years because students believe that their attitudes and beliefs are different from the norm. Males and females both believe that their sexes are more sexually active than they are in reality. Therefore women try to conform to the norm of hooking up and engage in sexual behavior because they believe that they are unique in feeling discomfort. On the other hand, men…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Dilemma's

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history law enforcement officers have been given the power and responsibility to use discretion while preforming their assigned duties. In early history, law enforcement officers were given a lot of discretion, where as now, they do not. Many laws have restricted officer discretion because of abuse. There are many different scenarios when and how an officer can use discretion and as well as how much discretion they are able to use, depending on the situation. Furthermore, in some cases for example, the use of traffic speed cameras or intersection cameras can issue tickets to unaware motorists where an actual police officer may be able to use discretion, common sense and reasoning before issuing a ticket. Discretionary decision-making is a part of officer’s duties each and every day that he or she has their uniform on. It is essential to allow officers the ability to make these kinds of decisions, but also restrict it as not to allow corruption or situations to get out of control. Officer discretion often comes under scrutiny because of unequal treatment by officers towards citizens.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working in higher education there are a few moral decisions I have faced. When I started as a higher education professional, there were decisions my department made that I personally disagreed with. Anytime a moral decision was made by the department leadership that I disagree with morally, I made sure I communicated this to my supervisor and we always discuss those concerns as a department after my one on one with my supervisor. As a professional, my moral decision making is based on my beliefs and life experiences. I choose not to change who I was as person or conform to a structure that was not conducive to my development a person or profession. I personally believe in Aristotle virtue ethics, which basically states that the character of a individual is important. Doing the right than at the right time shows the character of the individual.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes Means Yes

    • 1080 Words
    • 3 Pages

    California State University as well as University of California have both recently adopted the “affirmative consent standard” and fully support the bill. “Affirmative consent” means that there was a voluntary and conscious agreement in order to participate in a sexual activity. However, legislation is divergent to…

    • 1080 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sexual Harassment Policy

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Regents of the University of Colorado. (2005). Sexual Harassment Policy and Procedures. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from http://www.cu.edu/policies/Personnel/sexharass.html…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Analysis

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case presents a very typical situation that people encounter while working in the corporate environment. What is ethical, what is morally correct and what is just right out against the law are the questions that we all face while working in a corporate environment. Some of the ethical questions are governed by the law facing the situation. For example while working in an investment bank you most probably have access to inside information about upcoming deals that one could possibly use for personal monetary gain or you could act as a tippie and possibly share that confidential information with others. This kind of a situation is definilety governed by the law and you can actually be charged with various insider trading laws and possibly do some jail time as well. The other situation that is presented in the case is purely about ones ethical and moral standards. The analyst either has to compromise her loyalty towards her company B&B or towards her best friend Lori. While the situation presented is not a real zero-sum game, i.e., one player’s loss does not equal to the gain of the other player. When faced in a situation like this one has to think about what decisions can be made that will have the least affect on the players involved. The analyst should not look at the situation she faces as black or white. She should rather think about other options she might have to retain her friend’s loyalty while not compromising her loyalty towards her current employer. For example, Lori has already been laid off by her current employer, Universal group. The Universal group has already broken certain ethical and moral laws by not informing about the situation to B&B. So can the analyst come up with a situation where she can get Lori immediately and legally hired at B&B and convince her to share the information with B&B. In essence Lori will not have to feel guilty about not keeping the information confidential as has been laid off and the…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays