For many years, some people have believed that there should be a limit to technology use. The author Nick Romeo highlights the main ideas of his article he published on how technology is developing to affect individual’s intelligence. He indicated that at many times people rely on technology to assist them with numerous things throughout their daily routines and that the more we use it the more we get more it becomes addicting. Other people think that technology is actually building us to a smart path and that it saves much time and effort. The author, Andrew O’Hagan has addressed in his article “In Defense of Technology” that technology has made life much simpler and that it had no harm at all. I think that technology has its advantages and I also recommend to be cautious with its use.…
When taking into account how technology has changed and progressed over time, it can easily be seen how technology has impacted society today. The progression of technology amongst society has some constructive effects but they come hand-in-hand with the adverse effects that are truly detrimental to the ways individuals continue to communicate. How much is society truly effected by technology today? How dependent on technology have people become? How long have people been effected by their dependence on technology? Are there any solutions to these problems? Two individuals that assess these everlasting effects are David Crystal and Tiffany Shlain. David Crystal addresses the various negative and the few positive impacts that are brought alongside…
Considering that we are currently in the Net Generation and electronic communication has substantially taken over a lot of the linguistic communication, as well as electronic communication shortcuts have also become quite popular, such as textism and instant messaging. The research was conducted to verify if the current net communication shortcuts have an effect on the quality of writing.…
The article I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language, by John Humphrys, addresses text messaging as a threat to people's ability to engage formally in use of the English language; especially in the younger generation. John Humphrys takes a unique perspective when analyzing the practice of text messaging. Humphrys focuses on the present and mainstream uses of text messaging, without analyzing the historical processes and the language values of the so called text speak. This paper will argue against John Humphrys' claim. Text messaging is a valid form of language as it; has been created through historical and social processes; holds a set of unique and evolving characteristics; and therefore in no way harmful to the users' abilities to use the English language.…
In chapter fifteen ''2b or Not 2b?'' of ''They Say / I Say'', David Crystal provides arguments in favour of text messaging. Crystal tries to prove his point that text messaging is not destroying the English language with great research, a lot of examples and a clear organization. As the author himself puts it, ''Texting has added a new dimension to language use, but it's long-term impact is negligible. It's not a disaster. ''. Although some people believe text messaging is pillaging our punctuation, savaging our sentences and raping our vocabulary, Crystal insist that. In sum, then, his view is that the abbreviations were used as a natural, intuitive response to a technological problem, but that they are also more than just time and energy saving act. He considers some texts also as linguistically quite complex.…
Over the past ten to fifteen years, there has been a major change in the way people communicate to each other due to the development of the internet. Because of this, there has been a massive effect on the amount of socialising between friends and family; using technology in online social messaging websites such as Bebo, MSN, Facebook and many more. Through these social messaging websites, more and more people can interact with their friends and family all over the world. An expert professor David Crystal has supported the idea of web-based messages and disagrees with the view that slang and contractions leads to a lower English standard of language. Although this is a benefit to most people, it has been abused by some people by overusing it and different ‘language’ while typing, which cause differentiation in the way we speak and the way we write. The current views are pointing at the fact that this is causing a pejoration in this generation’s language which could badly affect their and our future; destroying the conventions of Standard English. This essay will evaluate the similarities and differences between spoken language and web-based messaging such Facebook and many more.…
By shortening words are we working faster or just being bone idle? The online communications through social networking sites such as Yahoo messenger, Msn messenger, Skype, Facebook and IM chat have revolutionized the way communicate and causing rapid change in linguistics. The use of these sites threatens the education system and the appropriate prescriptive grammar.…
In this assessment I will be discovering two contradicting attitudes towards texting. I will be investigating John Humphry’s article, “I h8 txt msgs: how texting is wrecking our language” together with David Crystal’s analysis of text messages looking at whether the English language in changing for the good or bad. Also I will compare the good points and bad points of both sides of the argument.…
With technology rife in today’s society are the boundaries between spoken and written language becoming ever nearer? It seems that young children, teenagers, adults and even the elderly are all turning to mobile devices as an aid of communication. The frequent use of texting has brought about new features, such as clipping, that are unique to the texting world, this is thought to be putting a strain on our abilities to use correct Standard English. In this essay I will explore the variety of language and text specific features used within text messaging. I will also analyse the various attitudes towards texting and finally give my own opinion.…
“I cannot imagine how I would live without it.” These are the words uttered by countless teenagers and adults about the technology they use to enhance their daily lives. It is hard to remember the days of lugging around CD’s and walk-mans. Bicycles as transportation seem like a thing of the past. Writing notes and remembering information for the next day is long forgotten. Reading encyclopedias and using books for research papers seems nonexistent. Simple technological advancements have changed how people view the world. As a child of a modern age, technology has become an integral part of my everyday life. A separation of these technical innovations…
Between e-mailing, texting, video conference, and social media, people can connect anywhere with anyone. The theory that the use of computers represents a cultural technique emphasizes the great significance computers have in today’s world and offers numerous connecting factors for evaluations of philosophical, sociological and linguistic nature (Ruda, S & Rothkegel, A, 2012, page 177). Having access to the Internet helps to see and relate to different cultures. The most significant impact of technology on communication is the spread of the Internet and the possibility of sending emails and chatting. In the pre-information technology days, a document often required re-typing on the typewriter before the final version.…
We live in the twentieth century and the ever-evolving technology available to us is playing a large role in how we communicate with others, more than any other generation in history. We now have the ability to call someone instantly and it doesn’t matter if they are 10 feet away or 10,000 feet away. There are many advantages to having a cell phone. For example, if you get into a car accident you can call 911 immediately and get help. And with the recent invention of smartphones we can hold all of the world’s knowledge in the palm of our hand. With internet so accessible, you can Google things instantly and find answers to an infinite amount of questions. The Internet also makes applications like social media and e-mail possible, and we…
In the article “2b or not 2b”, David Crystal begins with discussing how others such as John Humphry argued that texters are “vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbors 800 years ago. They are destroying it” (335). This is also the common belief of most people. People often argue about the bad points of technology over our language. However, Crystal believes that texting can improve children’s ability to read and write rather than hinder their literacy as many people claim. He also argues that not all texting are done in abbreviated words. Complex messages and institutional messages are often texted in standard form of orthography. In his conclusion, Crystal states that, “There is no disaster pending. We will not see a new generation of adults growing up unable to write proper English. The language as a whole will not decline” (345), which means he is generally optimistic about texting.…
With the breakthrough in technology, communication seems to be changing drastically. Communication began face-to-face; over time, easier means of communication were developed and revolutionized our culture. The culture of communication was reformed by technological developments such as: the cell phone, e-mail, and social networking websites. These technological developments are so common that many people from recent generations could not imagine what they would do without them. Fawzia Kalek, a middle aged computer science major, has experienced both cultures and the transition from old fashion communication to modern communication. In an enlightening interview, Fawzia describes the revolution from her educated perspective.…
Anyone remember when email was going to destroy letter writing, and even the art of writing altogether? Well, it did destroy letter writing, but did it really destroy the art of writing, or just change it?…