In Bradbury’s dystopian society, the government only permits citizens to watch government-approved TV shows. By destroying any chances of reading or thinking in leisure time, the government exposes the citizens to the limited activities of working or watching an updated version of television. This eliminated room for free thought among citizens, and it still rings true today. Likewise, Bradbury raises the concern of the effects of a totalitarian government, which obtains its power by manipulating the media and therefore manipulating the minds of citizens, as seen in Fahrenheit 451. To put it briefly, Bradbury uses Beatty’s dialogue to convey how the switching from a literature-educated to media-educated society may be a reality in the twenty-first century. The author bases his disturbing conclusion upon the onset of World War …show more content…
In addition, Bradbury illustrates the decimation of Montag’s city, “For another of those impossible instants the city stood, rebuilt and unrecognizable [...] and then the city rolled over and fell down dead. The sound of its death came after” (153). The concentration of media on other matters keeps the people unaware of the detrimental situation, a subject in which Martin Kich touches on in his article “Television and Warfare” when he claims that “the way that television portrays war [...] can have an effect on how war is thought about in the abstract” (Kich). Because earlier in Fahrenheit 451 people brought up war casually, the bomb going off in the city speaks volumes of warfare’s impact (maybe we should