Preview

Ted Cruro's In Catilinam Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
852 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ted Cruro's In Catilinam Analysis
On Thursday, November 20th a speech was delivered by Ted Cruz as a reaction to another one of Obama’s actions. This speech is a modern American version of Cicero’s In Catilinam, a speech which was uttered by Cicero against the traitor Catiline who planned to overthrow Rome and seize control. Cruz only made use of the first fourth of the first in a group of three speeches, since he only needed that mch to make his point and as everyone knows, Cicero is extremely long winded. Ted did not change much, only adding two or three sentences and making the language more inclusive as well as changing some names and places to match contemporary America.
One of the biggest effects the use of the translation of CIceroäs speech would be its level or formality.
…show more content…
A notable difference between the original and Ted Cruz’ speech would be the places where instead of simply saying “men” Ted Cruz says “men and women” since in modern times women can vote and are an influential part of society. There are also small section within Ted’s speech that were not in the translation of Cicero’s speech, the more notable one starting with “dictates by” and ending with “he ignores”, though the exact beginning and end of this original part can be debated. Within that section Ted Cruz expresses his belief that common folk nowadays are all talk and no smack, folk that “do not take part in public deliberations” nor “come into the senate”. Of course Ted made some obvious changes as well, such as changing the Paletine Hill to “the border” and O Catiline to “President Obama”, and not only did he change those names, Ted removed a whole section where Cicero mentioned specific people putting others to death and implying that Catiline should be killed. This section was removed either because of the implication of the want of executing Obama, or due to Ted Cruz being a ddungbo and not wanting to decide which person he knows should play the part of P. Scipio and which should play Pontifex.
Throughout history people have detested Cicero for his extremely long speeches and his hard to find verbs. Ted Cruz, probably having come to the same conclusion, only made use of the first 2 or 3 parts of the first oration against Cataline (of three). This made the speech easier to listen to, easier for Ted to present it, and easier for common people to process it, due to the fact that after a while one forgets what the orator is talking about since they keep going off topic like Edgar Allan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff’s. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff evaluate the Neo-Aristotelian style by stating, “The importance of this principle can scarcely be exaggerated; without it, modern speech criticism would not have been possible.”(464) They go on to explain that without this style speechmaking wouldn’t be as exceptional today and would be much like ancient rhetoric. They say, “The problem in the traditional system appears to be an omission rather than an inherent defect the genre and remain consistent with Aristotelian principles. Finding Rosenthal’s analysis of ethos suggestive, we approached the campaign oration as an instance of “personal persuasion.”(464) Where the crowd and audience act more or less like a judge of future events similar to that of an election. The speaker must be prepared to embrace the crowd while giving their speech. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff compare a variety of speech analyzation styles throughout their article however coming to an ultimate conclusion of the ability to critique comes strictly from the critic…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catiline and Cicero were fierce rivals for positions within the magistracy. Cicero was famous for his orations which is what helped his rise in power within the government. Catiline was plotting to kill Cicero and overthrow and take control of the government; however, he was thwarted when his plot was discovered. He was stripped of his power and run out of the city. Catiline was later killed in a battle as he continued his fight to overthrow the government from his stronghold in Etruria.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the emergence of the Roman Republic, the Senate, consisting of the patricians of the society, became “the governing body and the only body where debate was possible”. To debate properly in the Senate, “one had to know the persuasive art of rhetoric and oratory, or public speaking”. Cicero and Quintilian, both men of political influence in the Roman Republic, were well known as “quintessential figures of Roman rhetoric”, and they both used this art to promote the power of a leader and to gain…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you need to save money on food, turn your eye to breakfast. There are plenty of options that you can make that are quick, will fill you up and that don"™t cost a lot. For example, oatmeal is a great choice. If you are able to save on breakfast and lunch, you may be able to treat yourself to a meal out with friends every now and then.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Sextus Roscius trial was significant with regard to gay strategies Cicero used in many of his subsequent law cases as a lawyer. An example of one strategy Cicero incorporated into his defending speech was “cui bono”, which translates to “who profits”. However, this trial is also significant on a broader scale because it could largely be seen as gay defining trial which led to gay unprecedented career of Cicero where failure in place of success in this specific trial could have potentially led to political disaster as well as destroying his character and family name.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final strategic error that Cruz suffered from was non-persuasive pathos. Pathos is employed in order to ignite emotion or feeling in an attempt to rally support. Cruz used effective descriptions and adjectives to employ pathos, but because of a lack of timeliness and empathy his pathos were not persuasive. At the beginning of his Prayer to France, Cruz effectively portrayed support and stood in solidarity with the people of Paris by asking God to, “lift up’, “comfort”, and “be with the people of Paris.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, Cicero supposed that although this would solve one problem Catiline was but one thorn of a rosebush. As addressed above Cicero had not one, but two audiences to persuade for now we will focus on his approach towards the Catiline and his fellow conspirators.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a reader compares the two statements, it is clear that Cruz uses all three of the rhetorical appeals in his speech, however, Francis use of all three rhetorical appeals is a little harder to see. Cruze uses pathos in his article to make the reader sympathize with the victims of these crimes; whereas Francis uses pathos to try and make the reader sympathize with those that commit these crimes. Both Cruz and Francis use pathos successfully, but Pope Francis has an easier time making readers feel sympathy for the…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As with any personal letter, it shows Cicero’s personal and emotional side as he writes to friends and even his son. Some of the manuscripts are as carefully written and executed as some of Cicero’s orations and because of this, they are just as valuable. As a philosopher, Cicero’s letters are important because they show what ultimately was going on in this man’s mind. His ideas and thoughts that prevailed in many of his more developed speeches, yet with a more personal note.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Safire Wood

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Wood’s essay Victory Speech and William Safire essay A Spirit Reborn were written about two of our country’s presidential speeches. Both Wood and Safire have distinctive opinions and different viewpoints; however, they do have resembling writing techniques. In A Spirit Reborn, Safire discusses the Gettysburg Address in comparison to 9/11 and analyzes the Gettysburg Address in great detail. Wood’s “Victory Speech” demonstrates how President Obama flowed through different ideas and analyzes specific details of President Obama’s speech offering his personal critique. Both Wood and Safire focus on word usage, connects the speeches with timelines, and historical events.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero's opening speech in the 'Trial of Verres' is focused on the failings of Gaius Verres as he rose up in the Roman political system to the level of governor, and his subsequent attempts to corrupt the court system in order to be acquitted and avoid a legitimate trial. Cicero doesn't attempt to portray Verres' situation as unique, and states that these acts of corruption and provincial malpractice are rampant throughout the Roman political system. Cicero systematically goes through Verres' misdoings in each of his positions, from abandoning his governor as a Quaestor, through to plundering households and cities as a provincial legate in Asia, then stealing from temples and public buildings during his Praetorship in Rome, and finally his great atrocities as a Governor of Sicily, leaving the province in a ruinous state. Following his outline of Verres' crimes, he moves on to how he has tried to avoid prosecution through corruption of the judges, and attempts to hinder court proceedings.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America history, every elected president will have an Inaugural Address to use multiple techniques to win their audiences. There is no exception in John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address which invokes the use of many rhetorical devices such as consonance, parallelism and anaphora.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays