References: Bazalgette, P. (2010), The influence of television on the general election. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/10/television-general-election. [Electronically accessed 24th December, 2010.]…
In the Michael Nelsons critique of James David Barber and the Psychological Presidency, he discusses important concepts from Barber’s book The Presidential Character. During his critique he explains that Barber cites a study of network evening news coverage of the 1972 election campaign which found that almost as much time was devoted to the polls, strategies, rallies, and other “horse-race” elements of the election as to the candidate’s personal qualifications and issue stands combined.…
The amount of air time Donald Trump received on the campaign may have been more than most candidates experience during their campaigns. Donald Trump’s face was consistently on the minds of millions because of the news and most social media platforms. This allowed people to have easy access to information on where Trump stands on many issues and what policies he wants to implement. Interesting to note, a political researcher by the name of James N. Druckman, wrote a paper on the effects of image by the medium television and how people’s mentalities shifts. In the results section of his paper, he…
1960 was the year of the very first televised news debate. In this debate, Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy fought for the presidency. Since, this was the very first televised debate, many didn't know what to expect, including the respective candidates. However, one candidate understood the importance of this debate, Kennedy. Kennedy practiced his debate, made sure to look well groomed and presidential, and even wore makeup, an idea that was unprecedented at this time. When the cameras turned on and thousands were watching, Kennedy was confident and handsome while Nixon was nervous and appeared unprepared (“Televised Debate”). This debate won Kennedy the presidency, and showed just how powerful mass media and television are to the American…
In 1860, the public were eager to listen to Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas debate for several hours; however, since television is centered around entertainment, most of today’s public focus on the presidential nominees criticizing each other, attending talk shows, and posting pictures on social media. For example, after an hour-long democratic debate, the media and social media erupted about Bernie Sander’s “burn” against Hillary Clinton. Most people do not even know what the debate was about. Also, “The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon” and “Saturday Night Live” often make fun of the presidential nominees. Americans love these talk shows, catchy news headlines, and blowups in social media, but, simultaneously, television is mitigating the seriousness of the presidential election. Television forces Americans to think lightly of the presidential election, which ultimately affects the way citizens vote. In today’s society, citizens are more likely to vote for a presidential candidate based on their looks or humorousness than in the 1800’s. Altogether, television has blinded Americans about the seriousness of the presidential…
Both presidential campaigns used televisions as their tools to deliver messages to a large audience. In fact, televisions were a primary way in which American citizens could learn about presidential candidates. Televisions were used to show debates between candidates, so that citizens could be able to know who should lead them.…
From the 1960’s to present day, media has made a huge impact on political affairs through television and radio. Many debates were viewed in different aspects, one of many debates displayed the importance of why technology is very important. On September 26,1960 the first Presidential debate was televised; the debate between John. F Kennedy and Richard Nixon was one of the most influential debates. It was a remarkable event that sparked a division between radio and television.…
Following the campaign, Kennedy and Nixon made history by having the first ever broadcasted debates ever. This event has largely impacted the future of debates we know of today as well as the way we perceive politicians by their appearances and not only by their…
THE influence of technology on the United States presidential elections is an on going debate among candidates and voters. "Has technology, such as the television, made elections more accessible, or has it moved candidates from pursuing issues, to pursuing image?" Television has pressured presidential candidates to succeed in the presentation of their image, instead of pursuing issues important to the well being of America, as a democratic nation.…
Although it was a novelty in the United States at the end of World War II, television became an important part of American life during the first postwar decade. Fewer than one out of ten American homes had television in 1950. Five years later the proportion had grown to two-thirds. New stations quickly took to the air and such networks. For the First time in history, political debates, issues, and other such important issues were capable of being broadcasted nationwide for the American people to view.…
There is numerous ways television has impacted an election in a positive way. Based on the article, written by Hilary Parkinson, former president Kennedy “took a leap in the polls after the [televised] debate”(4). While many people say that the candidate’s morals are what get them elected, without watching the television the voters will become clueless about what the candidate’s morals are. The television gives the citizens of the United States a chance to listen to the candidates’ opinions to be able to elect a new leader. Former president Kennedy agrees that “it [is] TV more than anything else that [turns] the tide”(4). Television gives the voters a chance to see the candidate’s body language. Because the citizens witnessed Kennedy’s body language and facial features, Kennedy won the election. Clearly, television may have a positive impact on a candidate’s campaign.…
Today in a world so populated by information in the media, candidates in high profile elections are able to place favorable biased information directly from television sets in front of a large percentage of the American demographic (Source D). Distracting messages appear in both advertisements and in one-on-one live debates mixed in with other entertainment in the same experience (Source B). Some of the people who would receive these are not the type to study candidate issue profiles under a microscope. They grab the information offered that appeals to their emotions and sympathies, such information that might have little or nothing to do with how a presidential candidate will decide how to vote. Such people go to their ballots with intent to vote for a candidate that will not act in their best interests. When people are focused on appearance and likeability, which take a front seat in television programming, they are not doing themselves any favor and are skewing the electoral process which is the basis of freedom in our country (Source C). It is absolutely un-American to negligently broadcast these messages over such a format of television.…
There has been much discussion about how mass media presents and can determine the outcome of presidential elections. The media has been accused of focusing on subjects such as the politician's personal life and their characteristics rather than looking at the political issues of the election. The voter's views can also be altered by political advertisements that do not focus on issues. This can cause the voters to believe that certain issues are important when in reality they are trivial concerns. Elections often become popularity contests because of the polling that is done by newspapers and TV news programs prior to the actual voting. Politicians then can have a difficult time guiding voter's opinions on their concerns.…
This new survey commissioned by MGH, an integrated marketing communications agency, found that 32 percent of survey respondents change the channel as soon as a political advertisement airs and during political news coverage, and nearly half (47 percent) of viewers will change the channel or mute the TV during a negative political ad. The vast majority, 88 percent of survey respondents said they are turned off by negative political advertising. I found these numbers staggering. Additionally, when looking at the age breakdown of younger voters aged 18 - 24, the survey found slightly higher percentages: Forty-five percent change the channel during political news coverage. Thirty-nine percent change the channel as soon as they see a political advertisement. Scholars argue that exposure to campaign advertising boosts turnout by providing voter with campaign information and heightening voter’s interest in the election. However experimental studies have shown that negative ads shrink the body of voters by angering voters and increasing their doubt about the process. According to MGH President Andy Malis. "During election years, television advertising space is limited and more expensive, so advertisers need to get creative and integrated with their media campaigns to ensure their message is getting through the clutter." MGH…
Political candidates, at every level of the political system (both national and local), have a tendency to dedicate significant resources to attempts to imprint their names on the public. Social media, signs, bumper stickers, commercial advertisements, and interviews are only a few of the lengths to which candidates will go to, all in an effort to spread their name. For instance, Although the U.S. presidential elections are still 14 months away, the early phases of the race have drawn unbelievable amounts of attention and even more media coverage. In fact, last week, the Republican party held their second televised debate, drawing the attention of millions of Americans. Not only does this serve as a forum to express political views, but also…