Preview

Ten Commandments In Public Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
207 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ten Commandments In Public Schools
A court in Connersville, Pennsylvania recently ruled in favor of an atheist group who wants to have the Ten Commandments removed from a junior high school. The atheist group claims that having the Ten Commandments displayed at the school violates the separation of church and state.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation had filed a complaint against the school. The school has been displaying the statue of Ten Commandments ever since the 1950s. The judge stated that the Freedom From Religion Foundation was right, and the administrators have to keep church out of the public school. Additionally, the judge stated that since Connersville Junior High School receives public funding, it has to abide by state laws.

The Ten Commandments statue will


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The “Establishment Clause” is a limitation within the United States Constitution preventing the Government from passing legislation respecting, promoting, or otherwise supporting an establishment of religion. The clause has been at the heart of many court cases that have gone through the United States Judiciary. From the first case of Bradfield v. Roberts in 1899 to the most recent case of Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe in 2000. Although some cases dealt with appropriations, many cases brought before the courts dealt with the introduction of religion and religious activities within government institutions, especially in public schools. Should local, state, or the federal government support, establish, participate in, or otherwise…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pennsylvania and Rhode Island had statutes that allowed the state to pay for parts of non-secular, non-public education such as teachers instructional materials, salaries, and textbooks for religious subjects. The appellants in Pennsylvania believed that this was violating the separation of church and state described in the First Amendment. In the Rhode Island case, the appellees sued to have the statute in question declared unconstitutional by arguing that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The district court found in favor of the appellees and held that the statute violated the First Amendment.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the student is giving the prayer there is no open forum as would be the case during public speeches. Without this in place, prayers before sporting events are not considered to be public speeches but are considered to be sponsored by the school. The new policy the school had to elect students to be the spokespersons to deliver the prayers was also criticized, leading the justices to believe the school was still controlling the process. The Court found the voting process that was used by the district of voting for if the prayer would be given at an event and who would give the prayer also caused rival political factions between different religion groups at the school. The voting process would create a majority win over the different religions within the district and that would be the religious voice that all would hear. The policy the district has fails to protect the rights of the minority of students. All the factors resulted in the policy of the district to be…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1954, Congress amended Title 36 of the United States Code by adding “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance. California Education Code section 52720 requires appropriate patriotic exercises to be practiced in every public elementary school every day. Elk Grove Unified School District’s policy required the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance every day pursuant to section 52720 of the California Education Code. Michael A. Newdow’s daughter attended a public school in the Elk Grove Unified School District in California. Each day, teachers at the school led the students in a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance, which included the words “under God.” Newdow, being an atheist and divorced with “shared physical custody” of his daughter, challenged the constitutionality of Elk Grove Unified School District’s requirement that teachers lead their classes in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Newdow filed suit in federal district court in California claiming that Elk Grove’s recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance violated the 1st Amendment Establishment Clause to the Constitution due to the words “under God” being included and thus, his daughter was being subjected to religious indoctrination. The district court dismissed Newdow’s claim on the ground that he lacked legal standing because he was divorced from Sandra Banning, the mother of his daughter, and that he did not have legal custody of his daughter. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court’s ruling, deciding that Newdow did have holding as a parent to sue and that the school district’s policy violated the establishment clause. The school district appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, which granted review.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eight of the nine Justices voted against Abington School District and one Justice, Stewart, voted for Abington School District. The Court voted against the defendant because they believed that the readings that took place were basically religious ceremonies and therefore had violated the Free Exercise Clause, Establishment Clause, and the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Clark then went on to say that although it is obvious the Founding Fathers were predominately religious and that many of the ideals America was found upon are based on Christianity, America was intended to be a place of equality and freedom of all things, including religion. He also said that even though children could be excused it was "irrelevant" because it did not stop the schools from violating the Establishment…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 6–3 decision of the majority was delivered by Justice Steven. For his majority opinion, the Alabama law "silence meditation or voluntary prayer" was unconstitutional. He found that was just to promote religion. He also found the implication of the words "voluntary prayer" as an issue of the Alabama law. The Justice Steven just focused on the purpose behind the law. The word "voluntary prayer" is not a protecting the student 's right but it encourage them to voluntary to prayer. One of the Judge also agree with his decision, Judge W.Brevard Hand, ruled prayer decisions in public school were wrong because this law is not apply to the states. As many states, they want to have the same decision and to make the world more successful. They both agree with Wallace v. Jaffree that use instructional times for silent school prayer and in public school are wrong. But with that decision, Justice William Rehnquist disagreed with them. He declared and endorses prayer in public school, even the religious in this situation. In addition, The District Court permitted the prayers to continue, because they ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a state from establishing a religion. ("Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)"). But the Court of Appeals ruled that they were unconstitutional, because the court had considered and had rejected the historical arguments. Because of that, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the law appealed to the Supreme Court, the Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted that they did it as the establishment of a religion of secularism. Also, after many decision, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren has angered southern conservatives that as many reason they made even more resentment that lead to many problem. Some people of Christian thought it would be good if the prayers at school. But the Supreme Court still…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The education of the nation’s youth has always been a contentious issue. One of the largest issues facing the education system is the integration of sectarian religions such as prayers into the classroom and other extensions of the education system. In the mid to late 1900s, several court cases went before the Supreme Court involving various aspects of state sponsored prayers. The two major cases involving prayers in schools were Engel v. Vitale and Abington v. Schempp. Within these two cases, the Court successfully and diligently balanced the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause and paved the way for the Lemon Test and Endorsement Test.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The second question of the case is whether or not the reading of the prayer violates the Establishment Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits laws that respect an establishment of religion by congress. Some parents argued that by having the students and teachers recite the prayer, the public was showing that the government was “respecting an establishment of religion”.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three years later, the controversy appeared in court again as West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. The case was brought forward on behalf of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. At this point in time, three of the justices that had ruled on the prior case had been replaced. In a 6-3 decision, the court overruled the prior Gobitis resolution and determined that the former resolution violated the students’ freedom of speech and freedom of religion which are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the U.S. Although it is up to schools and the government to teach students about patriotism and the importance of our American flag, it is not the role of our public school system to punish students that choose to not participate in the pledge.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gobitis case. Lillian and William Gobitis came home from school and told their parents that they had been expelled from their school in Minersville Pennsylvania because they did not salute to the American flag during the morning announcements. The Gobitis family belonged to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which bans any act that is like worshipping an image or idol, which is an offense against God. Walter Gobitis, Lillian and William’s father, asked the Minersville School Board to excuse his children from the flag-salute requirement. When the Board refused, Gobitis removed his children from the public school and enrolled them into a private school, which did not require the patriotic requirements. He then sued in the federal district in Philadelphia to stop the school board from requiring children to salute to the flag. Gobitis argued that his children’s rights to religious liberty under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution were violated. The lawyers of the Minersville School Board disagreed that the flag-salute requirement was a way to teach good citizenship and that it was a “secular regulation” that had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with patriotic education. They also argued that if they let students opt out of the patriotic ceremonies, it would conflict with the school’s responsibility to promote national loyalty and unity. However, the Court voted…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stephen and Darleen Fournier were residents of the Milford Central School District; sought to use the school after hours for meetings of the Good News Club, a private Christian organization for children. Their request was denied because the meetings were considered the same as a religious worship, which was prohibited by the school’s community use policy. The Good News Club filed a lawsuit claiming they were denied their right of free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a very high priced and respected legal advisor I would advise Ms. Charmander of her legal rights. I would also advise her of her duties as a teacher. In this scenario Ms. Charmander has an academic freedom to decide what she wants to teach in her classroom. She also feels as if the Pledge of Allegiance is promoting the endorsement of religion. Which is not allowed in a public school setting. Her students also have a 1st amendment right to hear and say the Pledge of Allegiance. The state cannot prevent people from practicing or expressing themselves as long as they are not disruptive. Ms. Charmander also has the responsibility to teach what the school has set in their curriculum. Teachers are generally allowed some of their own freedoms in how they deliver their curriculum. In this case it seems if the school is set on this particular subject. In fact…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Vs Agnostico

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The State should keep everything separated in order to not offend anyone, such as individuals like Mr. Agnostic. Our Constitution ensures that we will protect the people rights and liberties by not promoting or funding just one religion. The constitution establish that the government funds should be prohibited from funding religious exercise. Individuals have the freedom to exercise their religion but not with governmental funds unless the purpose is secular. In Mr. Agnostic case, The Ten Commandments in a public facility can be seen as the U.S has adopted an official national religion, in which it’s promoting. Not only is the religious monument in a public park but the State has to paid for the upkeep, which is not supported in the constitution. Using the case in 1941, the Everson v. Board of Education, Justice Black gave the opinion to the court in which he mentions how the “amendment requires states to be a neutral in its relations with groups of religious believers and non-believers; it does not require the state to be their adversary. State power is no more to be used so as to handicap religions. Than it is to favor them.” (135) The State is the reason why the conflict exists because they did not maintain a neutral ground and maintain separation. The religious monument should not be on State property. The religious monument fails the secular…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On First Amendment

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case in question is Barnette v. West Virginia Board of Educations. This case focuses on the Freedom of Religion. Can schools force children to say the pledge of allegiance? Can a school expel a student if they refuse to salute the flag? Evidence provided by the defendant, a scripture, “You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like anything that is in the heavens above or on the earth below or in the waters under the earth You must not bow down to them nor be enticed to serve them, for I, Jehovah your God, am a God who requires exclusive devotion, bringing punishment for the error of fathers upon sons, upon the third generation and upon the fourth generation of those who hate me”(New World Translation Exodus 20:4, 5), This was used as part of the Beliefs of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who believe that pledging allegiance to a flag is a form of idol worship. The prosecution brought up a past case of Gobitas v. Minersville, reasoning that this case had already decided it was constitutional to force the pledge of allegiance be done or face expulsion. The result of thisBarnette v. West Virginia Board of Education ruled it was unconstitutional to force a student to salute the flag and forcing a student to say the pledge of allegiance was a violation of the First Amendment. The impact of this ruling was a major gain for religious freedom. It opened the…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ten Commandments

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thou shalt not make wrongful use of the name of your god, I can only think of one criminal law that could be associated with this commandment, disorderly conduct. Although disorderly conduct does not mention cursing or cussing as part of the statute, it certainly is considered tumultuous behavior in certain contexts when an officer encounters an individual engaging in that type of behavior.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays