Tenets Of Francoism

Francoism as a philosophy has two main tenets. One for the individual, and one for the Order as a whole. Those are adaptability and sovereignty, respectively. That we are involved in an eternal revolution striving to further better ourselves while also combining our sovereignty under one Emperor in order to focus our power and remain free. However, this in and of its self is not the entirety of Francoism, as you delve deeper into the works and essays of many scholars, you find that adaptably and sovereignty are just the tip of the iceberg.

Francoism through the years has itself changed. This is made apparent in the fact that the essays interpretations of the time echo the political situation and the goals of the Order. It is from these essays
In fact, when looking through her Imperial Addresses, one will notice that there is little to no reference to Francoist thought at all. Brehon, sixth Emperor, brought The Order back to the idea of Peace, Strength, and Prosperity. It was under Farrin Xies, seventh Emperor, that The Order appeared to adopt the idea of Eternal Revolution. However it was Letum, eighth Emperor that the idea of Eternal Revolution, or always changing to be better, has been seen the most.

It only takes a simple look into the past to see that the ideas and tenets of Francoism have changed through history. Perhaps one can argue that it we merely discover more and more of Francoism through time, and that we are expounding on the simpler idea of days past. And truly, this is a valid argument. But one must look at the fact that throughout history, Francoism has directly reflected the state of The Order at that time. The focus, however, should be on the fluidity of Francoism. For not only does it teach adaptability to its members, but it itself is also
Having two entities constantly changing in reference to each other breeds unpredictability. Entropy is defined as unpredictability, but also as lack of order, or disorder (Oxford). Disorder as confusion (Oxford), and Chaos as complete confusion and disorder (Oxford). While I am in no way saying that The Order is Chaos, I am saying our state of chaos is preventing us from achieving a state of Order. We are suspended in the middle. Caught in a tug-of-war between our ideals and the necessity of survival. For if it were not for this touch of Chaos, we would have ceased to be after Armageddon, and if it were not for the touch of Order, we would not have risen to the heights we always