Tennessee Valley Auth V Hill Case Study

In Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978) (“Tennessee Valley Auth v Hill”), it was discussed whether a small endangered fish called the “snail darter” could stop the “intended transformation of the river into a 30 mile long reservoir by building the Tellico Dam. Congress had authorised funding for the project in 1967 to generate hydroelectricity, create recreational opportunities and flood control, and promote shoreline developments.” The question remains, what was the case about? Put simply, it was sustaining an environment and protection of endangered species of a little fish. Wm. Robert Irvin of the President of American River in his article in the Huffington Post stated “It was a fight to save a river, one that was itself endangered and crucial to the lives, livelihoods, and heritage of the people who loved
Thus, the true lesson of the snail darter is that when we fight to save a river, we fight to save part of ourselves.” It should be noted that Maclester University states that the snail darter has been delisted from the endangered species list and this is confirmed by the Act itself.
Up until World War 2, the Tennessee Valley Authority, did not have to answer to the federal government, or any office in particular, they were left to make changes and do construction wherever they believed it was needed. In slightly more than 80 kilometres you may find over 24 damns constructed by the Tennessee Valley Authority