Preview

Term Limits Of Athenian Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Term Limits Of Athenian Government
Who doesn’t love some fresh air? Who doesn’t love new ways of thinking and less corruption? The answer is: no one. Yet in our current republican democracy in the United States there are term limits for the president, but not for congressmen. Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms and are considered for reelection every even year. Senators, however, serve six-year terms and elections to the Senate are staggered over even years so that 1/3 of the Senate is up for reelection during any election. This system of nonexistent term limits for Congress is vulnerable to corruption, is close-minded, and deviates from the idea that Congress exists to help society, not to make office-holder careers. But fortunately, the U.S. can learn from the council of Athenian Democracy and change its system for the benefit of all. The council of 500 represented the full-time government of Athens. It consisted of 500 citizens, 50 from each of the ten tribes, who served for one year. In Athenian democracy members were limited to serve two one-year terms in their lifetime, thus every person had a chance to serve. One benefit of this system was that since most citizens had an opportunity to be part of the administration, the citizens who formed the assembly were now politically …show more content…
today? First is the argument of corruption. Members of Congress gain power and influence if they serve for a long period of time, which make it tempting to base their policies, votes, and actions on their own self-interest. Take for example Congressmen William J. Jefferson, whom after 18 years of serving in the House of Representatives (9 terms) was caught with hundreds of millions of dollars from bribes of companies who he helped do business in Africa. Either there are no term limits, which means more time to gain power and be corrupt, or there is a one-term limit, which limits time for corruption and encourages ethical policies for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Are term limits for Congress going to fix the corruption or end-less spending on big business agendas? There are multiple avenues that can be explored with this question and can go into much detail and side streets as possibly can be imagined, but the research that was done came back to three reasons why this would not work with each being worth mentioning. The main idea that was brought up was that term limits on Congress would be “unconstitutional”. As it stands now there is no amendment that states any restriction on the number or the time that a Congress person can be in office excluding the President. Second most noted reason is that it would remove the good along with the bad politicians and make for an inexperienced Congress. With the possibility of powerful staff members, lobbyists and bureaucracies if there are young or less experienced Politian’s in office. Third most voiced issue would be that of reducing the voter’s choice. This argument will be demonstrated not to be true.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Expertise and experience in government has become proportionately more valuable and can be better that a fresh perspective. In addition, term limits may prevent the best person for the job from being elected. Voters who believe extended incumbency undermines our democratic system free to vote against their particular incumbents. Denying other voters the right to choose a particular candidate whom they have chosen many times before is inherently unjust. Our system of representative democracy rests on citizens choosing the legislatures that they believe are the best choose despite how many years that they have served in…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morris Fiorina's essay entitled "The Rise of the Washington Establishment" provides some insight into the advantages that incumbents have over their opponents. He stated that out of all things a congressman can do to win re-election, pork barreling and casework are the most powerful tools he can use. He went on to state that a congressman's lawmaking activities are programmatic and much more controversial than pork barreling or casework because people are divided on many major issues. Thus, when a congressman engages in lawmaking activities, he will make friends as well as enemies, and no matter how hard he tries to keep everyone satisfied, there will always be at least a few people who oppose his actions. Fiorina wrote that word of mouth is still the most effective form of communication. When a constituent calls in to ask a favor of the congressman because the Bureaucracy is too slow or not giving them what they want, the congressman (or his staff) get right on it no matter what party the voter is loyal to because when the favor is done, that person will spread the word of the congressman's good deed. Fiorina stated that Pork barreling and casework are also more obvious and visible to constituents. They can see more jobs and new facilities and projects and favors being done for people. They can't always see how a law is affecting them. Also, he went on to make the point that a single congressman can take the credit for a project he got for his district, and certainly take credit for a favor that was done for a constituent in his district, but he can not claim that he was responsible for the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act. Opponents running against an incumbent…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A congress basher would see this as beneficial so they can get more opportunities to gain control in congress, but the reality is this only further weakens the powers of congress because with such short terms constantly up for reelection it is difficult, and almost impossible to achieve anything. Polsby notes the importance and the difficutly of the jobns members of congress have. He specifies with hey manage small group offices and attempt to please ther constituents. They serve on committees that oversee executive branch activity. They participate in general legislative work. They keep track of their own political business and they educate the people they come in contact with. These are just a few of the many duties of congress members, and there is reason things take so long in congress. Each member has to deal with all of the fore mentioned and more. One would be crazy to expect a member of congress to be successful in all of this in less than the current 6 year term. Polsby points out the reason so many members get reelected and it’s because they pay attention to the wants of their constituents. Bashers complain about the high reelection rates but the reason is clear, and this idea of a shortened term will only harm congress. Like Polsby, I think this attempt at congressional reform is a poor idea and can do nothing but harm the governmental system.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our Founding Fathers never expected Congressmen to serve life-long terms. They had intended on a system of citizens serving for a few years and then returning to their respective communities. Nowadays, our representatives are making permanent careers out of Congressional positions. They are able to maintain their place in government and make a living off of pay raises and benefits. Polling of voters has shown that there is a general distaste for political careerism.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Term Limits Pros And Cons

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Term limits are a limit to the number of years a person can serve in the government. Public approval of Congress is under 13% but around 95% of Congress gets re-elected every year. even though there are some pros there are cons. Once you are at a job for a long time you become better at that and when you start it’s harder and with a job of this importance it's better to have a skilled congressman than a new one. If the term was limited they would have to “break in the newbies” and that would take a lot of time to train them because it's a new position for them and all new people have to be trained to do the job correctly. And with this giant influx of new congressmen there would be few to actually legislate.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The longer a congressman/senator stays, the more power he has. This is an -advantage- to the people of his district/state.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know it is technically possible for someone to hold a position in Congress for a long as they wanted? For years, term limits have been a very sensitive topic in discussion as it is a debatable issue that contains two different sides; there should be term limits and there shouldn't be any term limits. Perspective one, which is in favor of term limits, explains how corruption and bad power influence would be limited. Perspective two, which is not in favor of term limits, states that experience matters more and that it needs to be preserved in Congress. There should be term limits in Congress to ensure less corruption, less personal gain, and more fresh ideas.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If this is an important enough issue that we apply it to our president, then it is important enough that we apply it to our state senators and representatives as well. Over the past thirty years, the issue of term-limits for state legislators has become increasingly important. In the early 1900s senators served an average of six and half years while representatives served an average of three and a half years (Johnson and…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a matter of fact, congressional term limit legislation was actually proposed in 1994 in the “Citizen Legislature Act” proposal which was introduced by then Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and other Republican leaders (Mullikin). Other than the aforementioned instance, term limitation related legislation has been proposed several other times, but was never actually voted for in either house of Congress. The simple problem with any type of restrictive legislation is that the people who are voting on the legislation are the ones who will end up being affected by it when all is said and done. The recurring issue when proposing anything that may limit Congress members is the fact that relinquishing power is something that they are not very good at. As a matter of fact, as of 2016, there are 13 members of Congress that have served over 36 years in Congress and are still serving currently. To put it in perspective, these select people have had some role in the leadership of our country since at least the days of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Former President Harry Truman once said that it is impossible to become rich in politics unless you are a crook. By allowing career politicians the ability to stay in office for as long as they desire, we are essentially allowing our country to be guided by crooks who, for the most part, only seek personal…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, there should be term limits for our US senators and representatives. One reason is congress needs new ideas and procedures and having someone new would help that issue because, there fresh and have new ideas to start while someone who's been in office for a long time has no ideas to help. Another reason that there should be term limits is that it will help with corruption. The people we have now in office are very corrupt and is not working. bring in new people constantly will either help or stop corruption in the government because of this it would overall help the US altogether. One thing there side might argue is that if people don't want them in office then they would get voted out. However there marketing is totally unfair, Wealthy…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The more experience one has, the better he will be at doing what is best for the country. With such a large and complicated federal bureaucracy, members are most effective - and most resistant to special interests - when they are most knowledgeable. They feel that setting limits is undemocratic. They don't understand why the officials cannot be rewarded or reprimanded for their work. They think setting term limits is a horrible idea, no matter what way you look at it.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Structure Of Congress

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States Congress is the bicameral council of the national administration of the United States comprising of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Congress meets in the Capitol in Washington, D.c. Both agents and congresspersons are picked through immediate decision, however opening in the Senate may be filled by a gubernatorial arrangement. Parts are partnered to the Republican Party or to the Democratic Party, and just once in a while to an outsider or as independents. Congress has 535 voting parts: 435 Representatives and 100 Senators.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One problem I believe that Congress has is that its members are more worried about making policy that helps the citizens of there own district because this benefits them and are not as concerned about making policy that helps improve the country as a whole. This is also known a collective dilemma. In our system of government as long as there is no exact definition of the public good, there will always be conflict between collective lawmaking and local representation. This is a problem that is not just exclusive to Congress, but has been going on throughout history. To help you understand this problem I will explain two examples, according to Mayer and Canon, which you may have heard of before.…

    • 2087 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is a country of democracy, hope, freedom, and opportunity. The Land of the free and the home of the brave is a common expression when speaking about America. However, the country is not without issues. Politics are becoming more and more complex and in the eyes of the American public, it is seen as ineffective and unproductive as Congress seems to make no progress in the betterment of America. In our political system, Congress is supposed to work for the people to improve the lives of the people. Yet, in multiple instances, Congress has proven time and time again how unproductive they can be when dealing with problems that plague our country. This unproductiveness from Congress leads questions such as why what the real issue with American Politics? However, with all things considered, the real issue in American politics could actually be the two political parties and how they operate Congress. The way in which they operate leads to little to no changes that could help benefit the lives of the American people…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays