Preview

Term Sheet Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Term Sheet Analysis
Key Assumptions
• Expect Trendsetter to grow quickly
• Revenue performance hurdles will be met (Alpha)
• No dividends are declared
• This is the first round of negotiations and both parties are open to at least one more round

Number of Shares
The number of shares held by the founders is a very important point they can try to renegotiate. In the Alpha term sheet the founders have a percentage ownership of 34% if the revenues hurdle of $500,000 is met. The founders hold 32.6% if the revenue hurdle is not met. Mega has no such revenue hurdle thus, with the number of shares outlined in the term sheet, the founders own 37.5%.
Negotiation: In the Alpha term sheet a higher number of shares for the founders would be preferable. We assume the company will meet the revenue hurdle of $500,000 thus the minimum number of shares issued to the founders we will accept is 4,657,143 shares. This assumes the pool of 3 million for the employees is the same as well as the shares to the investors at 4,761,905.

Performance Hurdle
Alpha mandates a performance hurdle of $500,000 in revenue must be met by the end of fiscal year 2000 in order to avoid the issuance of the shares in escrow and Alpha getting to appoint the 5th board member. This performance hurdle does push the company to achieve tangible results but it would be preferable to have it removed from the term sheet primarily because Trendsetter does not want to lose control of the company in the composition of the board.
Negotiation: I would negotiate to have this term removed from the term sheet. As mentioned above, the issuance of the shares in escrow decreases the ownership of the founders in the company from 34% to 32.6%. With a percentage ownership already lower than that outlined in Mega, this is not a term Trendsetter should be willing to accept. I would settle for a lower hurdle rate coupled with a longer timeline to hit the hurdle. The board composition is discussed below.

Liquidation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bear Stearns Case Summary

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1990’s the firm was a major player in initial public offerings for a variety of foreign and…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct1501 Exam

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages

    HJK Financial Solutions Ltd. issued a prospectus on Friday, 5th March 2004. The prospectus outlined the details of its Initial Public Offer. The purpose of the issue is to provide HJK with the working capital to complete its research and development work to commercialise its new financial software and expand its existing products. A summary of key information is provided below: Summary: The prospectus is for the issue of 6,000,000 ordinary shares at $1.00 each to raise $6,000,000. Oversubscriptions of a further 1,000,000 ordinary shares at $1.00 each to raise a further $1,000,000 may be accepted. The minimum subscription to be raised pursuant to the prospectus is $5,000,000. No shares will be allotted or issued until the minimum subscription has been received. The sponsoring broker will be paid a fee of 4% of the amount subscribed (and accepted by the company). The following are the accounts under the heading Owners’ Equity and are taken from the consolidated Statement of Financial Position in the prospectus issued by HJK Financial Solutions Ltd. Owners’ Equity Consolidated 28th Feb 2004 $ 2,875,000 (18,557) 2,084,119 4,940,562…

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Telsys Case Study

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We know that the available amount of equity left is roughly 76% after the British institutions and ITC are given their shares. Therefore, the remaining 76% will be split according to the amount of investment VCG makes, which will be ranging from $7-10.4 million.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accounting Study Sheet

    • 478 Words
    • 1 Page

    stock of fish. This bucket of fish was all that they had to dine on for the next week, so…

    • 478 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Myti-Pet Case Report

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    telsys international

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We know that the available amount of equity left is roughly 76% after the British institutions and ITC are given their shares. Therefore, the remaining 76% will be split according to the amount of investment VCG makes, which will be ranging from $7-10.4 million.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Spaceship

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The best recommendation would be to find a holding company that fits Big Spaceship's vision well. Although it's not ideal to be under a holding company's control, it provides the best stability for down turns in the market. If the holding company is a good fit, there is great potential for Big Spaceship to…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    UpDown

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the onset of the venture you and Georg Ludviksson each agreed to invest $5,000 in seed capital to launch the venture, but you had trouble defining your roles because of the overlap in experience. However, the perception was that you would secure the investment, and Georg would manage the product. Eventually you realized that you would require the assistance of a chief technology officer, which lead to partnering with Phuc Truong. According to the original formalized one-page agreement Georg Ludviksson, Phuc Truong, and you (Michael Reich) would be equal partners, except that you would get approximately five percent more equity for starting the idea. After securing a $270,000 investment from angel investor Joachim Schoss, there was increased enthusiasm amongst the team. However, at the beginning of February the team’s progress was not meeting your expectations and you felt that your cofounders were not providing an equal contribution. With the angel round of investment becoming probable you have decided to engage a lawyer to incorporate UpDown and legally document the equity split. Additionally you have considered proposing a revised equity split that would give you an additional nine percentage points. You should not attempt to renegotiate the Equity split contract for UpDown because Georg and Phuc have significant alternatives and potential psychological and interpersonal barriers.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trendsetters Inc

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Trendsetter Inc. was formed by Wendy Borg and Jason Kushdog, the CEO and the COO respectively, in March 2000, to deliver innovative warehouse and distribution management software program for clothing retailers. The “founders” started the firm after quitting their respective jobs and decided to pool in their savings in the firm. The software produced by the firm would contain a demand forecasting module that would be capable of performing tasks for the fashion industry with the same impact that the spreadsheet had done for accounting. Initially the firm started out its operations with the savings of both the owners, but each of them knew that they would not last very long with limited capital at their disposal. The software would require a lot of money to develop and they also knew that they would need a partner in the development stage. At this point, they knew that they had to approach Venture Capitalists that would be willing to believe in the potential of their product and invest in their firm. They had approached a few firms through high level contacts established in their previous jobs. After making as many as 7 presentations, they received 2 offers from the firms that they most wanted, Alpha Ventures and mega Funds. There was just one small hindrance though, neither of them had any experience in dealing and evaluating offers from venture Capitalist firms. Alpha, although interested, were skeptical of the firm’s ability to get a five star client like Waldo, on board at an early stage. As a result, they valued them lesser than other Venture Capitalists as they were not convinced of their ability to generate $500,000 in revenues in the first year of operations. One thing that both the owners of the firm knew was that even though the initial valuation of both the VCs was not very different, they would need to be careful in analyzing the term…

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sluggers Come Home

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both parties want to make the deal. They both know it could benefit both sides to make the negotiation flow, but there’s some differences between that makes a little hard to involve in.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nanogene Case

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In November 2001, the team of Tompkins Mark Masterson, Ravi Rhoota, and Gary Gary Garfield met to formally incorporate NanoGene. They discussed a number of important issues including equity splits, salaries, funding strategies, and naming Tompkins CEO. The founders decided a salary of $120,000 and split the equity equally. NanoGene closed a deal with an angel for $600,000, and their own stock would be 20% immediately, 20% at the end of the first year and the remaining 60% at the rate of 2% per month. In September 2002, Tompkins met with VCs seeking $10 million in series A financing. After doing several due diligences on the company, the VCs had serious issues with the decisions the founders had made. First, it was the large founding team, the fact that split the equity equally, the salary, and none of them had experience as a Chief Scientific Officer of an established firm. According to the VCs CEOs usually have 7 to10% equity and makes about $250,000 salary, and senior scientist $95,000. Another issue that the founders had was that they wanted to hire Miller as VP but they were not agree with the salary she was asking. Mean while she agreed to do some consulting projects for NanoGene. Miller did help the team do some hiring process and with the compensation policy.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M&A Outline

    • 15996 Words
    • 64 Pages

    4) Proxy Fight: take control by controlling BOD. Get the company without putting the equity and without investing: has not been successful in the past. Bay have a brighter future in combination with TO…

    • 15996 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Certo, S. Trevis (2003) ‘Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signalling with board structures’ Academy of Management Review 28(3): 432-446…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    over the preceding 12 months. It had attracted big-name venture capital partners and listed shares…

    • 13273 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wang Yong Term Sheet

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This Term Sheet is not a legally binding agreement between the Series A Investor, the Group and the Founders and Senior Management with respect to the subject matter hereof, except for the paragraphs below under the headings of “Confidentiality”, “Legal Jurisdiction” and “Exclusivity.” A legally binding agreement between the parties will not occur unless and until all necessary corporate approvals have been obtained by the parties hereof (as applicable) and the parties have negotiated, approved, executed and delivered the appropriate definitive agreements. Until execution and delivery of such definitive agreements, the parties shall have the absolute right to terminate all negotiations for any reason without liability therefor.…

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays