Preview

Terrorism and Freedom of Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terrorism and Freedom of Speech
Terrorism and Freedom of Speech

How has terrorism affected our right to free speech? Most of people know that civil rights are privileges that citizens have when they participate in the civil and political life of the state. In America, the ideal is that all citizens should be able to They can live with no discrimination or repression of freedom. Citizens have civil rights and the government and other citizens cannot interfere with those rights. Terrorism, in particular the attacks on 9/11, caused the government to take aggressive action to locate and imprison terrorists among the civilian population; the Patriot’s Act limited or denied citizens and terrorists basic freedoms in exchange for public safety. Many citizens and civil rights groups have decided that they are unwilling to live with the limitation on their right to free speech that the Patriot’s Act has imposed in order to curtail terrorism.
After the act of terrorism of September 11, 2001, our right to free speech has been affected. “Political spying, monitoring, and harassment of Americans based on their constitutionally-protected activities by federal, state and local officials in at least 33 states and the District of Columbia.” (ACLU of Michigan, 2011)”
The attacks of 9/11/2001 have affected and changed American citizens and the country forever. That day has had one of the most horrible impacts on the United States of America that it has ever received. Since that day, security and freedom of speech have taken a 180 degree turn. Liptak (2010, February 10) says reports that in February 2010, Ralph D. Fertig, a lawyer, said that he would like to help a militant Kurdish group in Turkey find peaceful ways to achieve its goal. But he fears prosecution under a law banning even benign assistance to groups said to engage in terrorism. The Supreme Court will soon hear Fertig's challenge to the law. “The First Amendment in section 215 of the USA Patriot deals with ‘material support’ which it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act detriments our political freedoms on behalf of national security and hurts the values that distinguish our nation. The act consolidates numerous fresh powers in the executive branch of government. The most vital feature of the Patriot Act is a new, in-depth meaning of terrorism. “Section 802 states that a person engages in domestic terrorism if they do any act dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if that action appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.””(The Patriot Act Helps Keep America Safe. 9 June 2005.)” The acts must take place above all within the national jurisdiction of the United…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Act, aimed at updating both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the Electronics Communications Privacy Act of 1986 is composed of 10 titles all of which were hurried through Congress on October 24th, 2001 and passed the senate the following day, “…with little deliberation. Unlike a typical statute, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate issued a report on the PATRIOT act.” (Standler, 2007-2008, p. 4) To this day, the Patriot Act remains controversial; its supporters uphold it as a requirement for The War on Terrorism and for the enforcement of modern electronic communications law. The Act’s critics cite its numerous infringements on civil and individual rights. Title II, considered the most controversial, deals directly with surveillance, wiretapping, and computer fraud. Title II also details sanctions placed on trade with the Taliban, Syria and North Korea. The Patriot Act’s Title II, Enhanced Surveillance Procedures is a breach of privacy and infringes upon the tenants of our Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps, many thought, September 11 would mark the beginning of a time when all Americans would stand together in unity and equality…. politicians passed new laws like the “USA Patriot Act” that greatly expanded police powers to spy, arrest and interrogate suspects (League for Revolutionary Party, 2011).…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 11, 2001 changed America forever. The 9/11 cases challenged the government power and its relation to individual rights during times of war. Al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization funded by Osama bin Laden targeted the American government in a series of deadly attacks on 9/11 that killed over 3000 people and injured scores of others. The United States declared an act of war against Terrorism and soon was heavily involved in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Similar to the Korematsu v. U.S. (1944) Supreme Court cases where Congress authorization forces the government to comply with an order. The 9/11 cases were no ordinary in nature but it was different from similar cases. One must understand the complexity of the cases and the course of action…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All remember the horrific happenings from September 2001. As everyone recalls the incident, they remember where they were sitting when the news came across the television and radio that the world trade center had been hit. The terrorist attacks sparked America to enter a war with Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and their colleges in the Middle East. Along with the United States’ effort to put an end to terrorism over seas, there were non-violent efforts taking place to monitor possible terrorist attacks all over the world. President George W. Bush put the Patriot Act into effect on October 26, 2001.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Etzioni, A. (2004). How patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom versus security in the age of…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros/Cons Patriot Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). The events of September 11, 2001 led to the near unanimous support for the Patriot Act. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, many Americans were fearful of what the future held. Enacted as a response to those attacks, and as a way to re-instill a sense of security to the nation, American legislators worked to pass the USA Patriot Act of 2001. The Patriot Act appropriately made changes to other U.S. laws to combat terrorism, however it also established measures that may potentially hinder the rights of those it was designed to protect, sparking controversy regarding privacy and governmental power over the lives of private citizens.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the aftermath of September 11, Congress was eager to put laws on the books to prevent another attack. In an unprecedented spirit of bipartisan patriotism, a law was passed in the House by 357 to 66 (Clerk of the House) and in the Senate by 98 to 1 (Secretary of the Senate). The title of the act, USA PATRIOT Act, is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Since its historic passage there has been much debate on the constitutionality of the act. Some would claim the Legislative and Executive branches acted opportunistically and enacted a law that infringes on the rights of Americans. This paper, for sake of brevity, focuses on Section 213 of the Patriot Act, the “sneak and peak” section. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the arguments on both sides of the issues and determine whether or not Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT Act is indeed unconstitutional. This paper examines the history of the Patriot Act, evaluates recent litigation concerning this act, and considers precedents that would give or withhold from Congress the authority to enact such a law.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research laws and Acts

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the biggest violations to American Civil Rights is the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of the U.S. Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The act greatly reduced restrictions that were placed on law enforcement agencies and gave them the ability to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial, and other records. It eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States and expanded the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions. The Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the powers can be applied. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional. Opponents have criticized the sections that authorize the indefinite detentions of immigrants, searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge, and the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order. The Patriot Act gave law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to business records, including library and financial records. Not all aspects of the Act have been challenged and many Americans have approved the passage. People have promoted the provisions made to the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering. Title II of the Patriot Act established three very controversial provisions, “sneak and peek” warrants, roving wiretaps and the ability of the FBI to gain access to documents that reveal the patterns of U.S. citizens. The so-called “sneak and peek” law allowed for delayed notification of the execution of search…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Courts generally have held the law to be constitutional on its face as an appropriate exercise of authority to protect national security, though historically it has been subject to abuse if applied broadly to otherwise protected activities, such as the right to free speech, rendering it a particularly dangerous tool by which government authorities may silence speech that they consider to be contrary to government interests. Parts of the Patriot Act explicitly allow determinations to be made based on an individual's beliefs or speech. The Patriot Act threatens exclusion not only to those who provide direct support to such organizations as Antifa, but also to those who provide encouragement. This activity could have a devastating effect on the…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 Dec. 2008 http://0- find.galegroup.com.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. Bader, Eleanor J. "The Patriot Act Discourages the Free Exchange of Ideas." Current Controversies: Free Speech. John Boaz. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 8 December 2008 http://0-find.galegroup.co m.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. " How Patriot Act 2 Would Further Erode the Basic Checks on Government Power That Keep America Safe and Free." American Civil Liberties Union. 30 Oct. 2002. ACLU Foundation. 2 Dec. 2008 http://w ww.aclu.org/safefree/general/17346leg20030320.html Levendosky, Charles. "Unconstitutional Sections of the Patriot Act Should Be Repealed." Opposing Viewpoints: The Patriot Act. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 December 2008 . Miller, Amy, and Ryan Lozar. "The Patriot Act Threatens Students ' Privacy…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays