The prevalence of criminal activity in certain communities has caused criminologist to focus their attention on race and subcultures, creating, what Crutchfield perceives as the tenuous theory, known as the subculture of violence. In his essay, Crutchfiled discusses Wolfgang and Ferracuti in order to demonstrate the link between their thesis and the subculture of violence. As a result, the philosophical viewpoint that certain scholars posses when analyzing the relationship between assault, criminal activity, and ethnicity, become evident. Wolfgang and Ferracuti composed the argument that subcultures of violence manifest in lower-class, urban, non-white communities and are preserved by a specific social structure, family characteristics, an…
Using the material from item A and elsewhere asses the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining subcultural crime and deviance in society.…
In this trimester, I have studied Paradigm II at Mahidol University International College, which is a core course for the social science division. This course learns about the major paradigms in social sciences during the twentieth century. In the past few months, a lecturer, Eugene Jones, opened a documentary film named Bowling for Columbine. In this film, a filmmaker, Michael Moore, try to find the reason of butchery in the United States. After I watched this film, I had learned that there are numerous reasons why Americans are so violent.…
In assessing the usefulness of subcultural theories it is first important to understand what subcultural theories are. They are an explanation of deviance in terms of the subculture of a social group arguing that certain groups develop norms and values which are to some extent different from those held by other members of society. There are a number of sociological theories, which strive to understand a cause for crime and deviance. Subcultural theorists posit the idea that there is nothing “wrong” with criminals and those who commit deviant acts. Instead, they advocate an alternative set of values or a “subculture”.…
Most sociological theories presume that once a deviant or criminal act has been committed then the response will be uniform, however this is not the case as people respond differently to deviance or rule breaking. In the early 1960’s gay men were more likely to be stigmatised than now. John Kitsuse interviewed 75 heterosexual students to obtain their responses to (presumed) sexual advances from gay men. The point of this was to show that there was no agreed definition of what constituted a homosexual advance it was open to negotiation.…
The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 was a huge explosion that destroyed a federal office building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. One-hundred and sixty-eight people lost their lives in the terrible act of domestic terror. The bombing is believed to be an act of retribution from a fundamentalist sect known as the Branch Davidians. The Branch Daviadians had run-ins with the government before. Their compound was destroyed and any of their members were killed in the show down with federal agents. The Branch Davidians were a secretive underground private militia that harbored foul feelings towards the government in Washington. They were alienated citizens armed to the teeth, and were hyper-suspicious of all government activity. It wasn't only these radical…
The second topic is Terrorism, Hostages, and Child Warriors. These people target certain classes, cultures, and ethnic identities like genocide. “Terrorism, as a tactic, finds its military use in sapping the will to resist. Its intensity comes from its flagrancy. The more…
“I reached the decision to go on the offensive-to put a check on government abuse where others had failed in stopping the federal juggernaut running amok” (qtd. in BBC News), were the words of Timothy McVeigh who took it upon himself out of the act of rage to bomb the Alfred P. Murrah Building on April 19,1995. His actions were due to his anger with the government for what happened at Waco. This tragic event known as the Oklahoma City Bombing, was the most devastating incident of domestic terrorism in our nation’s history that left Americans shaken with their own sense of vulnerability. Since April 19, 1995 at 9:02 a.m this tragedy has left an effect on its victims, the Oklahoma City community and the nation entirely emotionally, physically, and economically.…
The chief conspirators in this attack have been Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols which met in 1988 at Fort Benning during basic training for the U.S. Army. Michael Fortier which also had some degree in involvement had been McVeigh’s army roommate. The three were sharing a common interest in survivalism and vehemently opposed gun control. They have all expresses anger with the way the Federal Government handled the 1992 FBI standoff with Randy Weaver at Ruby Bridge and the 1993 FBI standoff at Waco, Texas against the Davidians which ended with the burning and shooting deaths of David Koresh and 75 others. In March 1993, McVeigh visited the Waco site during the standoff, and then again after its conclusion. McVeigh later decided to bomb a federal building as a response to the raids.…
National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11. But now domestic terrorism is becoming increasingly common among hate groups across the nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as visible crime, or "street crime." These acts would consist of violent crimes, (acts against people in which injury or death results) property crimes (acts that threaten property held by individuals or the state) and public order crimes. (acts that threaten the general well-being of society and challenger accepted moral principles) It can also however be described as political crime, (criminal acts by or against the government for ideological purposes) which would include the 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.…
De La Corte, L (2007) 'Explaining Terrorism: A Psychosocial Approach ' Perspectives on Terrorism, North America, Vol. No. 2 [Online] Available at: <http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/8>. (Accessed: 5 Dec. 2012).…
Since the turn of the century, the postmodern world has seen increasing levels of political, cultural, military and socio-economic tumult, much of this due to a series of terrorist attacks on American soil and the resultant waging of Washington ’s “War on Terror”. Consequently, the nature of terrorism has come under intense media focus and is subject to immense debate, especially on its justification. Before engaging in such a debate one must first identify terrorism as an act of widespread violence, whether on the part of a state or individual, against another state or society, with the ultimate goal of forcing the latter party to cede to the formers demands – be they political or socio-economic. With such a definition in place we find that terrorism is indeed unacceptable in a vast majority of occurrences. But we cannot be entirely certain that that is the case for a few but highly controversial situations. In its entirety, though I would tend to agree with the statement I must also state that it is too complex to be offered a clear-cut response.…
Along with the increasing rise of technological advances, commodities, reforms these frontiers have also serve to facilitate the rise of new contemporary issues that elude criminologist and pre-existing theories. Theories which originated from a “great crowd of very diverse people meeting up and passing through, sometimes establishing fruitful exchange, sometimes merely rubbing shoulders in the crowded passage of textbooks and conferences” (Freilich & Lafree, 2014). To honor those encounters in this essay I’ll be describing how the contemporary issues of terrorism and cybercrime are impacting standing theories.…
Borgeson, Kevin , and Robin Valeri. Terrorism In America. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009. Print.…
Terrorism has become a world wide phenomenon these days. What precisely do the terrorists prefer to call themselves when they gain nothing by attacking common, innocent people whose death or maiming does not better the strategic or tactical position of terrorists. Common man begins to hate them and is ready to denounce them as soon as he thinks it safe. Thus terrorism becomes a social evil.…