Preview

Test Bank

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
21854 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Test Bank
Module C
Legal Liability

True / False Questions 1.
Auditors are potentially liable for monetary damages and subject to criminal penalties for failure to perform professional services properly. True False 2.
Auditors cannot be held liable to their clients for failure to detect material management fraud. True False 3.
Joint and several liability is a doctrine that allows a successful plaintiff to recover the full amount of a damage award from any defendant regardless of the defendant's level of culpability. True False 4.
Strict privity is the relationship of parties who enter into a contract together. True False 5.
The restatement of torts extends liability for ordinary negligence to "foreseen" third parties who may not be explicitly known to auditors. True False 6.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act deals with lawsuits in both federal and state courts. True False 7.
Legal liabilities of auditors may arise from lawsuits brought on the basis of the law of contracts or as tort actions. True False 8.
Tort actions cover civil complaints other than breach of contract (such as failure to exercise the appropriate level of professional care). True False 9.
Actions brought under common law place most of the burden of proof on the defendant, usually auditors. True False 10.
Auditors' primary defense against a claim for ordinary negligence is to offer evidence that the audit had been conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. True False 11.
The Ultramares case holds auditors to a higher level of responsibility than the Rosenblum v. Adler case in terms of common law liability to third parties. True False 12.
Gross negligence represents a more significant departure from appropriate professional care than ordinary negligence. True False 13.
The Securities Act of 1933 regulates

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 404 Quiz

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The assessment against a defendant of that portion of the damage caused by the defendant's negligence is called:…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beechy6eVol2 SM Ch12

    • 6352 Words
    • 54 Pages

    The definition of a liability embodies a future sacrifice of assets or services, a present obligation, as a result of a past transaction or event.…

    • 6352 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Auditing Chapter 4

    • 3567 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Ultramares v. Touche case held that auditors could be held liable to any foreseen third party for ordinary negligence.…

    • 3567 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the runershop

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To illustrate the linkage of management assertions to audit evidence in the context of auditing Notes Payable.…

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Possible Exam 3

    • 10029 Words
    • 41 Pages

    5. Although The Board of Directors is responsible for approving the hiring of auditors, they are not responsible for the financial statements. It is strictly the auditor’s responsibility to make sure the financial statements are fairly presented. FALSE…

    • 10029 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Tort law has a compensatory function which means damages may be awarded where a person had been injured by the negligence of another.…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under the traditional choice-of-law rule of lex loci delicti (The law of the place where a wrong was committed.), what conduct constitutes contributory negligence is a question of substantive law which is governed by the law of the state where the injury occurred. Thus, whether contributory negligence of the plaintiff precludes recovery in whole or in part in a negligence action is to be settled by the law of the place of the wrong. A comparative negligence statute likewise is part of the substantive law of the state, and therefore, the effect of the plaintiff's comparative negligence also will be determined by the law of the jurisdiction in which the wrong occurred.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The burden of proving a tort defence, such as voluntary assumption of risk, is on the…

    • 3682 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    – In tort/negligence law the plaintiff must prove three key factors on a Balance of Probabilities.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hammurabi Research Paper

    • 3478 Words
    • 14 Pages

    strict liability)”. When a tort is committed, the harmed party sues to receive compensation for his…

    • 3478 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the chief legislative counsel for an accounting industry, we believe that the privity approach is the best way to regulate the accounting profession in terms of liability in the state of Texas. It is necessary that a contractual relationship or in the least a direct connection be evident between an auditor and a non-client in order for that auditing firm to be liable for any damages done unto the third party. In the Ultramares v. Touche case, the judges found that a liability arose out of a duty that Touche, the accounting firm, owed to the non-client, Ultramares. Touche certified that their client, for whom they were performing the audit, was solvent when in fact it was not. In the case, it is pointed out that Touche knew their client was borrowing at large sums and required “certified balance sheets for continuing existing loans and securing new loans” (Ultramares). However, the auditors did not explicitly know all of the parties who would be relying on these statements. It would be prudent for non-clients relying on a company’s financial statements to contact the auditing firm so that the auditors know the non-client will be relying on them. This would help the auditors not only make a more adequate measurement of risk, but also allow them to give a more qualified opinion by allowing them to focus on those areas the non-clients will be relying on. In Landell v. Lybrand, it was found that accountants falsely reported financial information for their client and, consequently, were being sued by a party who had purchased stock in that company. The court decided, however, that since the auditors had no knowledge of the stock purchaser, a duty was not owed (Landell). Many frivolous lawsuits would arise if accountants were liable to anyone who relied on a client’s financial statements. This would clog the system with unnecessary costs and time demanding proceedings. Judge Finch’s dissent on the Ultramares case states, “If the accountant is to be held to an…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. SAS No.106, "Audit Evidence," identifies the principal "management assertions" that underlie a set of financial statements. The occurrence assertion was particularly critical for ZZZZ Best's insurance restoration contracts. ZZZZ Best's auditors obtained third-party confirmations to support the contracts, reviewed available documentation, performed analytical…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 1 Study Guide

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Plan on additional study efforts for the specific topics noted on the study guide.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz 2

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (TCO 4) To succeed in an action against the auditor, the client must be able to show that:…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The implications for independent auditors are: 1) Companies pose a higher risk 2) More testing would be required 3) Auditors may be allowed to charge a premium fee 4) Auditors' reputation could be at stake 5) Adjustments required reflecting real earnings may become more complex and subjecting to further discussion with management.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays