Preview

Texas vs Johnson: the Flag Burning Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas vs Johnson: the Flag Burning Case
Texas vs. Johnson
The Flag-Burning Case
Jennifer Watson
HIS 303: The American Constitution
Prof. Jill Walsh
October 10, 2009

The American flag is held near and dear in many people’s hearts. Most Americans see whether it is being saluted at a sporting event or pledged to at the beginning of a school day, the flag as an icon worth fighting and dying for. Since the American flag was created over 200 years ago, it has been a symbol of hope, freedom and pride. Even though the American flag has a long and glorious history, there are some moments when the flag has been under attack even by its own people. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Texas vs. Johnson that the First Amendment would protect burning the flag.
During the 1984 Republican National Convention, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson participated in a political demonstration. The protesters were demonstrating against President Reagan’s administration and certain Dallas-based corporations, where the Convention was being held. “They marched through the streets, shouted chants, and held signs outside the offices of several companies. At one point, another demonstrator handed Johnson am American flag taken from a flagpole outside one of the targeted buildings.” (Wikipedia, 2009) When the demonstrators got to the City Hall, Johnson unfurled the flag and set it on fire. While no one was hurt, many witnesses were extremely insulted and upset at seeing their country’s flag burn to ashes. “Of the approximately 100 demonstrators, Johnson alone was charged with a crime. The only criminal offence with which he was charged was the desecration of a venerated object in violation of Tex. Penal Code Ann. 42.09(a)(3)(1989).” (Apel) Johnson fought his conviction by turning to the highest court in the state of Texas, which is the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The state of Texas once again argued its’ case against Johnson. “The State had said that its interest were more important than Johnson’s



Bibliography: (2009, October 4). Retrieved October 6, 2009, from Wikipedia: www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson Apel, W. S. (n.d.). The Flag-Burning Page. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from Esquilax: www.esquilax.com/flag/texasvjohnson.hmtl

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So it's common that they surmise that desecrating the flag by setting it ablaze isn't right. Basically, they imagine that they are wearing the flag on their garments and slapping it on guard stickers all over the place is correct. Be that as it may, the legislature acts as though they have better things to do than to toss us behind bars for wearing Old Navy T-shirts or tossing out our patriotic paper plates and mugs after a fourth of July party or utilizing our flag stamped bathroom tissue. Should the legislature care more about what has been done to our national symbol? I think so. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin of The American President movie and each one of those individuals who trust that setting the flag on fire is secured by the right to speak freely are correct. Our U.S. Flag Code ought to stick to how and when the flag is shown, not to promote a desecration. Others are stating that the image of our opportunity is more imperative than the flexibility it symbolizes—and that is not the American way. As Lee Greenwood sings in his song “God Bless the U.S.A.,” “I thank my lucky stars to be living here today, ‘cause the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away”…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. This Supreme Court cases argues whether Brown (appellant) was validly convicted of refusing to comply with Police demands to stop and identify himself as it is a crime in the Texas Penal Code to deny identification on request when suspicion of crime has occurred. A violation of Texas Penal Code 38.02(a).…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Statute 42.09(a) (3) of the Texas Penal Code prohibits the “desecration of a venerable object.” This in lemans terms prohibits the burning of flags.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave o’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?” To people like Francis Scott Key, the writer of “The Star-Spangled Banner”, the American flag is a symbol of men and women standing up for what they believed in, and even giving up their life for it. These people care greatly about the American flag being honored and respected, and I am too.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregory Lee Johnson’s act of burning the American flag was not verbal communication.The United States Supreme Court ruled it as expressive conduct allowing it as the 1st amendment. In the case of Texas vs. Johnson, the United States Supreme Court leaned on Gregory Lee Johnson’s side, stating that this was an act of the first amendment under the United States Constitution. Gregory Lee Johnson’s charges and fines were dropped. The court case, Texas vs. Johnson closed on June 21, 1989. Shortly after the case of Texas vs. Johnson the United States Congress passed the, Flag Protection Act of 1989. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 rules that the government's interest in preserving the flag as a United States symbol is not more significant than the individual's First Amendment right to disrespect the American flag through expressive…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas v. Johnson (1989) supreme court case is very important. It was a landmark supreme court case, and decided for all future court cases how the first amendment would be interpreted. They had to look at and determine the extent of the phrase, "freedom of speech". Johnson's action of burning an American flag was to be reviewed and they would have to decide whether his action counted as "freedom of speech," and if it was protected by the first amendment. It turned out to be that his action was protected by the first amendment. Protection of the American flag does not come before the freedom to express political ideas.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some citizens write stern letters to their congressmen, some post signs in their front yard, others gather signatures on a petition to voice their opinions. However, Gregory Lee Johnson decided to set the American flag ablaze to allow his opinion to be heard. In 1984, a political protest march was occurring through the streets of Dallas, Texas consisting of a diverse group of civilians who were against the policies of the current Reagan Administration. Johnson, in the middle of the crowd, was handed an American Flag and some kerosene by an unknown protestor outside the Dallas City Hall; Johnson decided to throw the American flag onto the ground, pour the kerosene on it and set it on fire. Many protesters around Johnson began to chant, “America,…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia V Black

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All three men were convicted and they all appealed. Eventually all three cases were combined and brought in front of the US Supreme Court.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument that could be made is that this was not right, because the flag symbolizes something important to many people. This is a valid point, because it a lot of controversy and made multiple people angry throughout the whole case hearing. “The way to preserve the flag’s special role is not to punish those who feel differently about {nationhood and national unity}. It is to persuade them that they are wrong.” This basically says that we shouldn’t be angered and punishing those that disrespect the flag, but be more focused on persuading them they’re…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You’ve got to want it bad, cause It’s gonna put up a fight. It’s gonna say, “You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, whose standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime apposing at the top of yours. You want to claim this land as the land of the free then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag! ” The symbol also has to be one of it’s citizens’ exercising his right to burn that flag in protests. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burning American Flag

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is it right to burn a flag? If so why would someone do it? Maybe its because they feel that the united states isn’t really united as one. After reading the texts “American flag stands for tolerance” “My so called enemy” and “Texas vs. Johnson” the reader can understand the each of these texts supported information as to how different people from different religions and cultures should be accepted in our country. Also these texts tell the reader how the first amendment protects our rights to have freedom of speech freedom of religion. etc. and that we as human beings must be willing to accept people or opinions that are different from ourselves.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays