It helped the patient to not be careful about what they were telling the doctor. Once the Tarasoft case was opened up to the courts the Confidentiality between patient and psychologist was over depending on the conversation. If a patient like Poddar comes in with psychological issues a psychotherapist should always take action. The Tarasoft decision is a California decision that imposes a duty on a therapist to warn the appropriate people or person when he/she becomes aware their patient may present a risk of harm to a person or persons. The decision made by the psychologist was not a good one at all because the women were in danger. The psychologist alerted campus police because he took what his patient said serious but did not inform her or the family. The Psychologist suggested Poddar should be hospitalized due to his mental state of mind. The psychologist should have breached the patient confidentiality once he knew third party was unaware of the patient conversation with him. Poddar was let go because he seemed to be mentally stable. The patient was released back in the public even though the police knew he made a death threat about Tarasoft. The psychologist was told by the director of…
Chapter 18: Mayella begins her testimony, she is nineteen and relatively clean compared to the rest of the Ewells. She lives with seven younger siblings who do not help with any chores and an alchoholic father. She also does not seem to know what friends even are. She says that she had offered Tom Robinson a nickel the evening of the incident to break up a chifferobe for her. Atticus questions her story. Like why she didnt put up a better fight or why the children didnt hear her screams, and most of all how Tom managed to do this with only his right arm. Atticus pleas her to admit that there was no rape and it was her father who beat her but this only leads to anger and yelling. She then starts to cry and refuses to answer more questions.…
The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…
In 1976, the California Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapists have a duty to warn and protect potential victims if their patients made threats or otherwise behaved as if they presented a serious danger of violence to another. This ruling happened because of the Tarasoff Case of 1969, in which the court determined the need for therapists to protect the public was more important than protecting patient-therapist confidentiality. (Vitelli 1)…
Patients have two expectations when visiting a medical facility, quality care and confidentiality. At no time should a patient health information be disclosed with anyone unless for billing purposes. By doing such, the clinic violated the patient rights under HIPPA which protects the patient privacy. The clinic could also lose funding and patients. A patient may feel deterred from attending mental health programs provided by the clinic thinking their information may be shared as well. The clinic can also face lawsuits due to this illegal…
Child abuse and for the greater good are just two of several exceptions to confidentiality. Healthcare professionals are legally required to report any suspected child abuse and can disclose medical information to Child Protective Services and investigation services. Though confidentiality is one of the uppermost priorities in health care, there are times when the best interest of the public outweighs the protection of a patient’s private medical information (Stanford & Connor, 2014). For an instance, if someone has a highly contagious disease, alerting the public can help ensure their…
This Iranian myth entitled: “Zahak, the Dragon King” taken from Firdawsi Shahnamehtell’s epic “The Book of Kings” tells us a story about the Persian throne. It begins with a summary of the situation; the ruler of Iran, Jamshid is a great leader who has brought numerous technological advancements, social structure, and health to the people of Iran until one rued day; called Na Ruz, when he tells nobles that they should bow to him for he is so great and his thriving kingdom falls to ruin. Next we are taken to a confrontation between Zahak, the son of Mardas, king of Arabs; a righteous just man who tended flock very well and gave help to whoever needed it, and Eblis a spirit of evil. Eblis coaxes Zahak into thinking that he is righteous and after a little push convinces Zahak that he his father does not deserve the throne and his blood must be shed., although when Zahak asks for instructions he is told that they will be received later. One night when Mardas is going to bathe in his vast garden he falls into a pit that Eblis dug and is “destroyed,” with the thought of his back stabbing son. From this point Zahak was leader and completely under the evil spirit’s control leading up to Eblis touching Zahak, vanishing, and reappearing as two snakes attached to Zahak’s shoulders that doctors cannot understand and that regrow after being cut. In the form of a doctor Eblis tells Zahak that to appease the snakes they must be fed two brains a day, and Zahak begins sacrificing men. We are then brought back to Jamshid, whose kingdom is in awry. His people decide that Zahak is their new king and both his armies combined. After giving Zahak his crown and throne Jamshid disappears for 100 years and upon his return is captured by Zahak and cut in half, creating a kingdom of evil under Zahak. Reigning for over a thousand years we are brought to a point where Zahak has a nightmare of three warriors assassinating him and gathers a group of wise men to tell him a…
Levy (1996) looks at the decision as representing a victory for advocates for patient privacy and confidentiality rights. the American Psychiatric Association joined in the suit and argued in an amicus brief that in addition to Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, common law tradition support recognition of the patient-therapist privilege and it didn’t matter whether or not the therapist is a medical doctor. The issue was not the credentials of the therapist, but rather relationship nature between the caregiver and the patient. Mary Lu Redmond , On June 27, 1991, a police officer was called to a fight at an…
Clinical assessments have their place in almost every facet of the psychological and educational realms. I have been tracking down and examining what the most important aspects of assessment are that come into play in regard to drug and substance abuse, custody battles, as well as the importance the role of adhering to the ethical standards of utilizing culturally informed assessments. Clinical assessments within mental health centers are carry great importance in the identifying underlying behavioral problems, diagnosis, and treatment of patients. Behind every assessment is a clinician who carries great responsibility in maintaining professionalism and adhering to a strict code of ethical standards in order to maintain both their personal protection as well as the utmost priority of client protection.…
This quote reminds me so much of Jody. “Growing up, sports is my outlet, my way to portray a personality. I was very shy around people, but through sports, something I was good at, I was able to make friends,” by Curtis Joseph. Jody Lee McKenzie Thacker was born on March 20, 1996, in Alexandria, Louisiana. His parents, Curtis and Cheryl Thacker were very excited to have another child. Their first child Jeremy, who was fourteen years of age, was very happy to have a little brother. Jody and his family have lived in Hicks, Louisiana for a long number of years. He currently goes to Hicks High School, where his mother graduated from. His dad, however, did not go to Hicks, but instead went to a high school in Georgia. Besides his dad, his other family members have went and graduated from Hicks.…
Video presentation “Legal and Ethical Issues for Mental Health Professionals, Vol. 1: Confidentiality, Privilege, Reporting, and Duty to Warn,” (2010) explores true facts of various cases pertaining to abuse, some which are Supreme Court cases that dealt with mandating laws which require the duty to warn and report abuse and/or harm to the client within the counseling relationship. Conversations amongst a Supreme Court Justice leader, a clerk, and a legal assistant discuss and debate duties to report child abuse and terms of reasonable cause. Legal cases such as Tarasoff v. Board of Regents of the University of California are discussed in favor to laws that require the duty to warm when harm is clear and intended by a client. However, everything that is said or communicated by…
In middle school there was a cruel game we played called called ‘Zap.’ In this game a person would write on the top of your hand with marker word ‘zap’, on your palm they would write the name of a person who you were dared to “ask out.” It was a joke to make somebody humiliate themselves by asking the ugliest, nerdiest person out. Having your name written on the palm of somebody’s hand was the ultimate insult. As you might have guessed, I was many times the victim of the cruel joke and I knew why. The boys growing up would look at me like some sort of diseased animal and the girls would giggle and talk about me when I turned away. My self-esteem was always low and I’d always compare myself to other people. Even after I’ve grown into my nose…
In this paper, I will discuss the principles that permit disclosure of protected health information with or without the patient’s consent for each of the four categories, government agencies, legal agencies or representatives and research groups. I will also state whether I feel privacy safeguards are adequate to support those principles.…
In section B.2.a code of ethics, it states that counselor is required to disclose information about a client, who disclose about harming themselves or others (ACA, 2014). In the state of Florida, Florida Statues Section 394.4615 (3)(a) (2016), states that if a patient states they want to harm a person, a counselor is able to release information to warn that individual who is being threatened of harm by the patient. If i determine if the client is a high risk and is a harm to herself, under the Florida Mental Health Act, as a Mental Health Counselor I would be able to Baker Act my client. Under the Florida Statue Section 394.463 (2)(f)(2014), when a client receives involuntary examination, a client is held up to 72 hours, and the only way the Baker Act can be released is by a physician or…
According to the California Supreme Court ruling involving the Tarasoff’s “duty to warn”, is if a patient reports hurting someone or themselves, the therapist has the obligation to inform the police, their (the patient’s) parents, relatives, or friends. Failing to inform the proper authorities might lead to getting seriously hurt or even killed, which, in the end can result in negative consequences. Highly publicized lawsuits can occur, claiming that the therapist did not follow the Tarasoff’s “duty to warn”. A therapist’s obligations under the law to serve and protect individual’s lives overrules the therapist-client confidentiality by the need to protect the…