A handful of political leaders are influential enough to have an ism after their name. But no political philosophy has shaped a nation in quite the same way as Thatcherism.
At its most crude, Thatcherism represents a belief in free markets and a small state. Rather than planning and regulating business and people's lives, government's job is to get out of the way.
It should be restricted to the bare essentials: defence of the realm and the currency. Everything else should be left to individuals, to exercise their own choices and take responsibility for their own lives.
This was a revolutionary, even dangerous, notion to most postwar politicians.
Central planning of industry and society had helped win the war. The only way to "win the peace", it was believed by the leaders of both the Labour and Conservative parties, was to plan and control industry, vast swathes of which were owned by the state.
Margaret Thatcher was not alone in rejecting state ownership of businesses and socialist central planning.
Like other right-wingers of her generation, she had been influenced by The Road to Serfdom, by Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek, which warned of "the danger of tyranny that inevitably results from government control of economic decision-making through central planning".
But Hayek's brand of free-market economics was deeply out of favour in the 1950s and 1960s.
It was only when the country had been crippled by industrial strife and decline that it began to look like a credible alternative.
Thatcher belonged to a Conservative Party faction, headed by Keith Joseph, who were followers of Hayek's Austrian school of economics and were also heavily influenced by the theories of American economist Milton Friedman.
Had Joseph become Conservative leader instead of Thatcher. which seemed the more likely outcome at the time, then something resembling Thatcherism might have emerged as the prevailing economic philosophy of the age.
But it would not have been the same.
It took Thatcher's own background and personality, her belief in traditional family values and strong defence, her suspicion of an overmighty Europe and instinctive affinity with the US, to give shape and meaning to what we now know as Thatcherism.
Taking her cue from Friedman, she advocated monetarism, controlling the money supply with high interest rates, to tame inflation without resorting to union-negotiated pay policies.
Her battle against inflation led to mass unemployment, but despite that she managed to win a second general election.
Low taxation was a key area where Thatcherism was applied. Under the previous Labour government, there had been high levels of income tax for high-earners, but Thatcher progressively cut income tax - the basic rate of tax fell to 25%, while the higher rate was slashed from 83% to 40%.
There was a shift away from direct taxation to indirect, for example by increasing VAT from 8% to 15%.
Thatcherism also focused on rolling back the frontiers of the state.
To that end, Thatcher introduced privatisation of state-owned industries, including British Telecom, British Gas, British Airways and electricity companies, putting them back into private hands.
Such a retreat of the public sector from large areas of the industrial landscape would have seemed unthinkable a few years before, but were pushed through.
Since Thatcher's day, such privatisation has gone further, says Thatcher expert Professor Richard Toye, of the University of Exeter, citing the privatisation of British Rail under her successor John Major.
There was also a huge sale to tenants of council housing. The government also abandoned its commitment to full employment, stating this was the responsibility of employers and employees.
Thatcherism is also associated with the Iron Lady's own personal style, says Prof Toye.
"She saw herself as a conviction politician. She prided herself on her - what she would call - steadfastness, and what others would call her inflexibility."
She inherited a party that contained supporters of her predecessor Ted Heath, labelled by her as "wets", who opposed her monetarist policies and cuts to public spending.
In the early stages she had to continue to include them in the cabinet, says Prof Toye, but then gradually she rid herself of them.
"It was not clear in 1975 what a Thatcher government would mean for Britain. And it was clear when she came to power that she couldn't move too far too fast. That was reflected by her moving with caution and carefully at first in her first term."
Although Thatcherism was based on the austere-sounding philosophy of monetarism, Thatcher wanted to put a human face on it, so she talked about running the country's finances like a thrifty housewife.
She also made much of her personal story. "It was a fundamental part of her image - emphasising the value of hard work, her background as a grocer's daughter," says Prof Toye.
She contrasted that with the union leaders who she believed were trying to block economic progress.
She believed that Victorian family values were the way to improve society, through people bettering themselves. This was not just through economic means, "but there was an element of it being linked to respectability and societal values", Prof Toye says.
Conventional marriage and a nuclear family were the building blocks, he says.
One example of her impact on society was the inclusion of Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988. The controversial clause stated that a local authority shall not "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship".
Because it did not create a criminal offence, no prosecution was ever brought under this provision. While the legacy of many Thatcher policies remain to this day, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron wants to legalise gay marriage - a stance inconceivable to Baroness Thatcher, and a "huge change", says Prof Toye.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…
- 1128 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
There are four key principles in which currently influence modern politics and the direction of the current coalition. Firstly, Paternalism; One nation conservatism is about the stronger (richer) looking after the weaker (poorer) There is the idea behind this principle of a father looking after a son. An example of this principle having influence within the coalition is Cameron handing out and protecting free TV licenses and bus passes for the elderly. This principle clearly contrast with Thatcherites view on helping the poor, whom argue that people should help themselves and not to rely on others to help them. Overall on the principle of Paternalism I believe that the modern conservative party can be considered ‘One nation’ as although the coalition have had to make cuts due to the size and state of the deficit, cuts have included removing educational maintenance from a large number of students to help with the costs of sixth form study.…
- 980 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
John Maynard Keynes helped the allied government defend freedom by planning their wartime economies. Friedrich Von Hayek thought government interference in the economy was a threat to freedom. Keynes thought the market economy would go to excesses and when things got difficult the market wouldn’t work and the government would have to fix it. Hayek disagreed because he believed the market would take care of itself.…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Parallels can be drawn between Cameron and his predecessor, Margaret Thatcher: Cameron is a supporter of the free market economy; has voiced his support of foreign investment; supports a competitive market which brings benefits like jobs and cheaper prices. Cameron has spoken publicly about the need for the free market economy and said that they were the “best imaginable force for improving human wealth and happiness”.…
- 598 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Ideologies are a set of values and beliefs that can incorporate a range of factors including social, economic and political principles. Ideologies can become political when they are articulated in a concrete form as a programme of action e.g. a political manifesto. In the UK politics there have been numerous leading ideologies but there are five major ones; these include Conservatism, Anarchism, Socialism and Liberalism. These five ideologies have played a significant role in history by determining governments and political movements. However the political ideology of the current government is dominated by New Right ideology. This ideology consists of two elements. These are economic liberal attitude and individual choice and responsibility (Conor Newman, Jan 2008). The way that this political ideology affects health and social care policy includes the significance of individuals taking control over their own health and well-being through decentralisation of services and also the initiation of a superior role third sector (e.g. charities) and private…
- 3550 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
Thatcherism- philosophy that anything that technologically advances is good anything that prohibits otherwise is bad.…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One nation conservatism (traditional) Vs. Thatcherism One nation conservatism (traditional) Thatcherism Pragmatic – flexible Conservatives willinbg to change policies depending on public mood Accepts positive role of the State Postwar concensus – Accepted nationalisation: Welfare, NHS. Mixing economy.…
- 81 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Another one of Labour’s reforms to the UK was the devolution act. In Labour’s manifesto they said that they would address the issues of devolution and making the country more democratic. When Labour got into office they did…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A short story of Margaret Thatcher’s life is she was a controversial figurehead of conservative ideology during her time as the first female prime minister of Britain. She was born in Grantham, England on October 13, 1925 and became Britain’s Conservative Party leader. She was selected the prime minister of Britain in 1979 and became the first woman to hold that position. She cut social welfare programs, reduced trade union power, and denationalized certain industries during her three terms as Britain’s prime minister. Due to unpopular policy and power conflicts in her party, Thatcher resigned as Britain’s prime minister in 1991. Thatcher later died at the age of 87 on April 8th, 2013 (Biography.com…
- 2043 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
It is true that in many regards, modern liberalism has indeed rejected certain aspects of the classical liberalist approach, within such topics as individualism, freedom and justice. However, it would foolish to argue that they had abandoned it completely, as some elements have survived.…
- 1082 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Many different kinds of Conservatives Core Conservative beliefs Opposition to “Big Government” – Ex., Milton Friedman, Ayn Ran Conservatives believed that the government had no obligation to protect rights except property rights. Believed governments makes people Smooches off the government Does not believe that poverty limits potential If your poor it is because your “stupid” and “lazy” Believed people with ambition and smarts will ALWAYS be wealthy. Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand- key economists Support for “Big Military”…
- 351 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This article will be important to my paper as it will provide a look into how monopolies and industry was viewed getting ready to head into WWII where we know industry was crucial for the allies to win the war.…
- 1547 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
"Discuss what major policy changes have occurred to improve education provision for Early Years in England during 1997-2013"…
- 1626 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Demonstrate an understanding of the historical and ideological developments of UK social policy, identifying the underpinning principles and values.…
- 641 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Traditional conservatives place a higher emphasis on pragmatic ideas- as these ideas have been tested over time (a conservative would argue that they work; they are product of years of continuity) thus humans are incapable and essentially limited in radically making theories themselves. Their ideas may be based upon the idea of tradition; which aligns itself with the Darwinian belief that only the fittest policies have survived over the years- and have created what Chesterton called the ‘democracy of the dead’ which is much more reputable than todays ‘arrogant oligarchy’. Pragmatic ideas are preferred because they have continuously growing over centuries whereas principle would ensure instability- for example: the sudden abolition of the monarchy would heavily affect the public; because it’s nationally loved- therefore extreme principles of ideologies like communism would definitely cause imbalance. This agrees with the Burkean view that a human principle can’t be superior to the pragmatic principle that has developed on its own- as the political world is ‘boundless and bottomless’ (as Oakshott said), essentially too complicated for the human mind to articulate principles efficiently.…
- 1084 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays