The Actor Network Theory

Actor Network Theory views things differently. () suggest ANT to be a radical approach. Power for example, is viewed from a diverse perspective through the ANT lens. Power is all about `interaction between different actors be they human or non-human actors. According to ANT reasoning power is not the physical strength people are used to, it is about how well connected actors are. In the Muzarabani case, therefore, power is not about the local government structure and the scientific or indigenous knowledge systems that explains Ziziphus mauritiana value chain inequities, social injustices and ecological decay. The study argues the analysis of power is about the structure and systems of the Ziziphus mauritiana value chain.
In retrospect, power
Hence, acknowledging the Ziziphus mauritiana value chain as complex in Muzarabani. The study strived to bring together the social and the ecological to explain another way natural hazard mitigation can be viewed. The ecological perspective to natural hazard mitigation in semi-arid remains unearthed. The aim of the article was to provide academic literature that could inform and broaden natural hazard mitigation views on environment and human linkages. Ziziphus mauritiana value chain and ANT explored and underpinned the study. The study presented, how Ziziphus mauritiana value chain and actors involved explain the complex ntural hazard mitigation discourse in Muzarabani.
Drawing on Ziziphus mauritiana value chain and use of ANT in Muzarabani, the study argues an eco-resource comprehension in natural hazard mitigation discourse can provide an optional strategy. The eco-resource based natural hazard mitigation landscape will be composed of different actors that include farmers, indigenous knowledge scholarly work, interactive histories that portrays visibility of social capital. Interlink ages by both non-human and human actors to enhance profitability, innovation and in the end natural hazard mitigation directed to the poor communities in