Preview

The Adversary System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Adversary System
The Adversary System
Role of the Parties * Each party is responsible for the preparation and presentation of their own case and will present the best arguments to support their case. * In most cases legal representation will be used

Role of the Adjudicator * Either a judge or magistrates sitting alone or a judge and a jury * The judge is responsible for ensuring that both parties obey the rules of the court, application of the rules of evidence and procedure, ensuring that the burden of proof is satisfied. * In criminal cases where there is no jury the judge decides guilt or innocence. In criminal cases where there is a jury the judge will sum up the facts and relevant law and determine the sanction if the defendant is found guilty. * In a civil case in which there is no jury the judge will determine liability and the remedy. In a civil case in which there is a jury the jury may be asked to determine liability and the level of damages.

Roles of Evidence and Procedure * Reliant on the presentation of oral evidence that can be cross examined and tested for truth in the court by both parties * Evidence is presented on oath. * The vest evidence rule means that evidence should be presented only by an eye-witness in court. * Special rules apply for taking expert evidence.

Standard of Proof * Burden lies with the party bringing the case * Criminal – prosecution – beyond reasonable doubt. * Civil – plaintiff – balance of probabilities.

Need for Legal Representation * Due to strict pre-trial procedures representations is often necessary to achieve a just outcome. * Dietrich Principle – Judge can Order Legal Aid in a criminal trial if he feels the accused person would not get a fair trial without legal representation and can’t afford their own.

Inquisitorial Trial * Used in civil law countries. Such as France and Germany. * It varies from country to country but general features include:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    course of the trial. A team that deals with creation of material facts in this fashion will…

    • 4821 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a court decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent case involving identical or similar facts.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of US V. Nixon

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This also means that the court can be supplied evidence for…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | In a jury trial, the judge would decide questions of _______and the jury would decide questions of ________.Answer…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explain why the adversary system of trial is the best system for achieving justice in criminal trials?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can sue each other for money but can’t put each other in jail, only the state has the right too.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper explores what I think is the constitutional flaw of our criminal justice system, attorney-client privilege. Under certain circumstances, information possessed by an attorney cannot be disclosed to others without the client 's consent because of the attorney-client privilege or certain other legal concepts. The attorney-client privilege, which dates back to the reign of Elizabeth I, was originally based on the concept that an attorney should not be required to testify against the client and, thereby, violate a duty of loyalty owed to the client. At that…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moot Court Case Analysis

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I require you to object often and effectively during hearings and trials. I require you to raise appealable issues at every opportunity, regardless of whether you think the judge will rule against you or not. In the event I am convicted/adjudicated, if you have raised sufficient appealable issues, I will not have to appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel or sue you for malpractice or file a professional complaint against you. Such issues include the use of hearsay evidence, speculation, manufactured diagnoses by unqualified witnesses, violations of due process based on constitutional issues, violations of constitutional rights, improper jury instructions, introduction of evidence that you have not had the opportunity to examine, et.al.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the judge at trial must be allowed to have the power to engage in the decision making process of…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state Trial Courts are responsible for the arraignment of the defendants at the beginning of a case, selecting a jury among potential jurors, hearing the case from the accused side and the defendants side to effectively evaluate the evidence as according to the legal guidelines. After the hearing and evaluating the presented evidence, the state Trial Court is responsible for determining the facts of the case. When facts are determined the State Court is responsible for pronouncing the judgment, basing it on the facts and the legal guidelines. After making the ruling, the state court is responsible for imposing a sentence to the person found guilty.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evidence Hair Evidence

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    University, Cornell. "Expert witness | LII / Legal Information Institute." LII | LII / Legal Information Institute. N.p., 10 Aug. 2010. Web. 22 Aug. 2013. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witn…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays