Preview

The Adversary System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Adversary System
The Adversary System
The adversarial system is defined as a legal system where two advocates represent their parties' positions before an impartial person or group of people, usually a jury or judge, who attempt to determine the truth of the case.
The Key features of the adversary trial are the role of the parties, the role of the judge, the need for legal representation, the rules of evidence and procedure and the burden and standard of proof.
The advantage of the role of the parties is that you have control of your own case. You get to decide how to investigate the case, how many witnesses to call in a hearing or trial, what sort of evidence to bring out, whether to have legal representation, the method employed to bring out evidence. Parties are more likely to be satisfied with the outcome of their case if they are in charge of it. Being in control of your own case, you may do everything possible to win the battle.
The role of the judge is an important part of the adversary system. The judge’s role is to ensure a just outcome and conduct the case in accordance to the laws and regulations, and provide equal treatment to both sides. The advantage of having a judge is that it allows there is an impartial party to deliberate a fair outcome based on the cases presented. The use of an impartial decision maker is allows the public to feel more confident in the outcome of the case.
In a trial it is strongly recommended that you have legal representation. Having legal support will help you obtain the best outcome possible and ensure that you are treated equally and fairly during the case.
Another advantage of the adversary system is that it relies on oral evidence. When giving evidence in court, it must be given orally. When this is performed it allows judges, the jury and magistrates to see whether the witness is telling the truth and observe body language.
The burden and standard of proof are an advantage of the adversary system. In criminal proceedings the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Final Exam

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages

    6) Which of the following forms of alternative dispute resolution allows both parties to see the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the case through the presentation of evidence?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Minnoesota V. Ronald Riff

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this case, the prosecuting attorney are to communications orally and also in writing. The prosecutor main goal is to prove to both the judge and jury that the defendant is in guilty. The prosecutor opening the statement of Riff did knowingly commit the crime of breaking, and burglary on September 30, 2011 between 12:10am and 12:20 am orally to the judge and jury. The incident located at the Marquette’s Market on 1234 Main St. Midtown, Minnesota 44333, which the owner of the market is known as Speedy Marquette. It the prosecutor choice to share his/her witnesses including all evidence with the defense attorney before trail begins and to present evidence against the defendant to both jury and the judge. “All witnesses in this case include: Otis Ripple, Soapy Water, Marty Martini, C. Sharp, Betty Bitty, Rusty Fender, Guido Concertino, and the arresting officer are orally examined by the prosecution, and then the defense.” (Curran, P. & Strauch, G.). When prosecutor finish presented their parts, then it’s a choice for the defense to present their part of evidence. The prosecutor has choices of whether to examine all the defense witnesses to set straight all their statements, and to make sure that the defense is being guilty. The defendant witnesses include: Red Chips, Ace Harte, Jacques, Orbedder, Vibes Blare, Sally Slick, Matilda Slick and Gigi Gig have all been questioned by their defense attorney. Now that the defense has finish point out their statement and all of the witness are being examined and crossed, and all evidence has been presented both orally and in…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As for the Judges they decide if there is enough probable evidence to proceed with the case. Finally, the defense attorneys make arguments that certain evidence and certain individuals should be kept out of the criminal trial. I personally believe that the Judge has the most important role during Pre-Trail hearing because they have the final say on what can and will happen…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the role of and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study pal

    • 959 Words
    • 9 Pages

    preserve testimony of witnesses who may not be available for trial, reduce the likelihood of perjury, and define and narrow the facts.…

    • 959 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The courtroom workgroup consists of the participants that work for the court. The workgroup is composed of the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others that work for the court, such as the clerk and the court reporter. The judge has overall control of the courtroom and the workgroup. The judge is responsible for keeping the order and deciding guilt or innocents of the accused. The courtroom workgroup interacts daily in many ways. It is the responsibility of the judge to oversee all that goes on within the courtroom and ensure that rights are not violated as well as rule on each case that is put before them. The defense attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, and the public defenders, help paint a picture if you will for the judge of what happened. The judge then interprets the information he or she is given to determine guilt or innocence without bias ensuring that the accused receives a fair trial. The courtroom workgroup functions well, needing no major changes.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of US V. Nixon

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This also means that the court can be supplied evidence for…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effectiveness of the plea bargain is to spare the state the cost of a trial and reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment. The strengths work in the favor of the…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right, many people do not know how the trial process works, or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel of the courtroom work and the rolls and responsibilities of each person.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal trial process aims to provide justice for all those involved, while it succeeds in the majority of cases, it effectiveness is influenced and reduced by certain factors. These include the legal representation involved in a case and the availability of legal aid, the capacity of the jury assessing the trial, the credibility of scientific evidence and the impact of social media on the trial process. Due to such flaws the criminal trial process is not always an effective means of achieving justice.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mock Trial Closings

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction: Begin with a short introduction that catches the jury’s attention. It should remind the judges of the big picture. If it’s a murder trial, talk about how tragic it is that this person’s life was taken away. If it’s a civil trial you can speak about how the person’s rights were violated. Also be sure to introduce your theme during the introduction.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States court system is composed of numerous sections of bodies of law that function together to ensure justness is served in fulfillment with the United States Constitution, federal, state and local laws. These organizations include law enforcement, the courts and, correction system all of which have a legitimate responsibility to maintain the American Peoples trust. I am a strong advocate for our court system, although it can use some fine-tuning every level of Justice could stand some improvement but that takes time, commitment and the right officials in office.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial Judges are appointed to ensure justice in courtroom proceedings. Judges are also responsible with safeguarding both rights of the accused, and interests of the public. By doing so, this keeps the prosecutor grounded by making sure guilt is established of the accused as required by criminal law. The workgroup interact with each other daily. While the judge oversees the procedure, the prosecutor, defense attorney, and public defenders help to create a visual that is easy for the judge to see what happened. Prosecuting attorneys are the primary representatives of the people, by virtue of belief that the accused violated a criminal law and that the public knows about it. The defense attorney represents the accused by making sure that the defendant’s civil…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During trial there are ten basic roles associated with the courtroom. They are the judge, witness, prosecutor, the jury, clerk of court, court reporter, bailiff, defendant, defense counsel, and spectators or press. These roles make up the courtroom work group. All of these roles together help ensure the procedures of the criminal justice systems are being followed and carried out.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are two essential elements of the U.S. Judicial System. The most basic part of the system is the adversarial system of justice. This is where the litigants present their cases before a neutral party. Litigants pay their own lawyer fees in addition a fee for filing a civil case in federal court. Many rules exist regarding how evidence and testimony are presented, trial procedure, courtroom behavior and etiquette and how evidence and testimony are presented. For federal courts, the rules are determined by committees composed of judges, professors and lawyers appointed by the chief Justice of the United States. The rules are approved by the…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics