In addition, the author is granting those participating institutions who tend to get involved in these programs, not only do they get covered in college tuition, but they also should get support for their non-tuition expenses such as housing, and textbooks as well. America is one of the wealthiest countries all over the world, the author mentions that since the country supports other industries such as the gas industry and spend billions of dollars more to wall street, as well as other manufacturers, then the country has the total ability cover the cost of higher education. Education has been free from kindergarten through high school, why can’t the country support tuition-free higher education?
Back to the main point of the argument, the author is concluding the importance of having free higher education. Ellison insists that student loan debts should not a barrier to going to college, also debts should not be a barrier to seeking a college education “College shouldn’t just be debt free—it should be free. Period.” (Ellison, 9). Also, college must be free for everyone richer, and the poor, regardless of race, and …show more content…
The author conveys that the low-income students, get the support needed to pay for college tuition; however, those who are considered “rich” get to be in debt because they have access to economic resources that support their education. This idea raises a racial bias, and economic instability, because it shows the economic different between different social classes. This premise allows the argument to seem more dramatic, and unfair since the main conclusion is to provide equality for everyone. Then this premise supports the author’s conclusion. I found this premise very interesting, because it brings up more issues, and raises awareness to the serious issues in society, which persuades authorities on to be in favor of the