Despite the pro-Israel messages from the vast majority of American politicians and media figures, the conflict is so much more than Americans really know—no thanks to the seemingly one-sided media spin (Omeish 2007) and the Israel Lobby. Because of this lack of information, many Americans are on a pro-Israel rant as “Israel is often portrayed as David confronted by Goliath, but the converse is closer to the truth” (Mearsheimer and Walt 2007).
Common views on American-Israeli policy would probably be different if opinions were better informed, and this paper seeks to do just that. It will first explain the lesser-known truths regarding the conflict, give an alternative view of so-called terrorist groups, and offer different and perhaps more sound ideas regarding the U.S.-Israeli relationship. The central message is this: while Palestinians and certain so-called terrorist groups are criminalized for their actions, a deeper knowledge of the subject is likely to bring a greater understanding and sympathy for the true victims; that known, the United States should alter its current relationship with Israel so as to bring about a more stable Middle East—something that is truly in our best interest.
Before getting to the meat of the thesis, it is important to discuss the beginnings, development, and status quo of the conflict in a more balanced way. In other words, it is important to understand the conflict in a non-American-media-spun
Cited: Mearsheimer, John, and Walt, Stephen. 2007. The Israel lobby. London Review. At < http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html>. 03 June 2008. Omeish, Sufyan and Abdallah. 2007. Occupation 101: voice of the silenced majority. 90 min. Triple Eye Films. DVD. Pape, Robert A. 2003. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review 97 (August): 343-361. Rand, Matt. 2007. US support for Israel spurred 9/11. The Jerusalem Post. At <http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle %2FShowFull&cid=1191257274889>. 03 June 2008.