Preview

The Armenian Genocide

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Armenian Genocide
“The Armenian Genocide”
In 1948, the United Nations adopted the Genocide Convention, and in doing so defined the term “genocide” as “acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole, or in part, a national, ethical, racial, or religious group” (Totten and Parsons 4). Indeed by many scholars, this is thought to be the case as to what happened to the Armenian population within the Ottoman Empire in 1915. Rouben Paul Adalian, author of the critical essay “The Armenian Genocide” published within the book Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eyewitness Accounts edited by Samuel Totten and William S. Parsons, claims this belief to be true. In his essay, Adalian describes what life was like before 1915, reasons why the genocide happened, how the genocide was committed, and the impact the genocide left on society.
Before 1915 the Armenian people had lived freely in the region of Asia Minor for around 3000 years. However, around the 11th century Turkish tribes invaded the Armenians and took over the area while settling down permanently there. Because the Ottoman Empire eventually expanded their territory to Eastern Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa, they needed an improved political system in order to govern everyone effectively (Adalian 55). As a result, Adalian notes that the Ottomans “imposed a strictly hierarchical social system that subordinated non-Muslims as second-class subjects deprived of basic rights” (55). In spite of the Armenians being deemed second-class citizens socially, they were actually a middle-class group economically, leaving jealousy amongst the Muslims. Even though life for Armenians was serviceable, it would soon take a turn for the worst.
There are a few reasons as to why the Armenian genocide became certain by 1915. The first reason was because of the decline of power in the Ottoman government. Because the Armenians could see that the government could not guarantee the protection of their property and life, the Armenians looked for



Cited: Adailian, Rouben Paul. “The Armenian Genocide”. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 55-92. Print. Totten, Samuel, and William S. Parsons. “Introductions”. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 1-14. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When talking about genocide the topic may be difficult to explain or reason yet every person has there own opinion about it. Ward Churchill has a strong belief and how America still faces genocide even today. The thesis of this article is that genocide is practiced world wide and it needs to stop being denied by the people that it is happening all over.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From Graffam’s letter, it can be deduced that the people who attacked the Armenians had all bad motives, based on hate and discrimination. They wanted to send them away to be executed and taken to prisons or other locations. The attackers also wanted to steal the belongings of the Armenians and convinced the people that since they were going to die anyway, it was best if they just gave away all their belongings. The attackers stole everything from cattle to blankets and permitted local bandits to steal from the Armenians too. The main motive of the attackers was to execute the Armenians and hurt them physically. Clearly, all the attackers motives were negative.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lucas,Avila Ms.Muscat ENG2D 30 May, 2017 Armenian Genocide Changes Boy's Life Forever The Armenian genocide changed one boy's life forever, Vahan Kenderian, a 12 year old boy who was the black sheep of his family soon realises the good times have run out.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although ruled by the Ottoman Empire, the Armenians were able to practice their religion and keep their culture by paying special taxes. They were not allowed to own weapons or become government officials.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term genocide was not coined until 1943 when Raphael Lamkin used it to describe the Nazi reign in Europe (ROD notes). Genocide refers to the systematic destruction of a racial or cultural group. Two examples of this are the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking. The Holocaust deals with the Nazi’s takeover of Europe during World War II, and the Rape of Nanking is the Japanese invasion of China in the late 1930’s. These events in history serve a painful reminder of the cruelest depths of human nature, but also of the possibilities that lie within every catastrophe.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ottoman rulers, like most of their subjects, were Muslim. Christians had to pay higher taxes than Muslims, for example, and they had very few political and legal rights. In spite of these obstacles, the Armenian community thrived under Ottoman rule. They tended to be better educated and wealthier than their Turkish neighbors. In 1908, a new government came to power in Turkey. A group of reformers who called themselves the “Young Turks” overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid and established a more modern constitutional government. At first, the Armenians were hopeful that they would have an equal place in this new state, but they soon learned that what the nationalistic Young Turks wanted most of all was to “Turkify” the empire. According to this way of thinking, non-Turks–and especially Christian non-Turks–were a grave threat to the new…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass Killing Summary

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shaw argues that studies on genocide have concentrated too heavily on the specific perpetrators and victims with regard to intentions and identities respectively. Instead, he wants to propose that the crime of genocide should be understood within the structure of conflict situations. The most important aspect of genocide studies from the point of view of politics is that the concept of genocide must be clarified, Shaw believes that scholarship should provide this elucidation. By returning to the original definition proposed by Lemkin, the focus is more generally on attacks by the armed against the unarmed. Shaw states that “Lemkin invented ‘genocide’ because he wanted to describe – and highlight for countervailing action – a general class of violent actions.” Taking lessons from one of the most influential studies on war by Carl von Clausewitz, Shaw sees genocide as a form of war directed against civilians. Debates about genocide have certainly advanced since the introduction of the term, yet, Shaw feels these debates from the 1940s onwards have lost two very key aspects of the original concept. In agreement with Lemkin the omission of cultural genocide or social destruction meaning not just physically but a way of life and how genocide relates to war are vital in understanding the nature of the crime. He argues that “Genocide always involves physical violence but it involves many other things as well. Defining genocide by killing misses the social aims that lie behind it. Genocide involves mass killing but it is much more than mass killing.” Similar to some of the arguments made by Claudia Card in relation to the inclusion of cultural genocide, Shaw’s assertion that genocide must be viewed in the context of war provides a valuable framework for understanding the particular violence against civilians. The use of word civilians here is important for Shaw, rather than the UN Genocide…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thet Sambath

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    History has been no stranger to the multitude of genocides and mass killings in countries all over the world and for various reasons. There are infinite ways to narrate the occurrence of these atrocities; however, they are most frequently characterized as either purposive or illness narratives determined by the culture that is creating the retelling of these experiences. Genocide can be defined as "the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation;" therefore to neglect the impact of culture in the created narrative depicting these atrocities would be deemed ignorant, primarily due to the fact that genocide and mass killings…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian Genocide is a genocide that happened amid and soon after the First World War, from 1914 to 1918, which brought on the passing of 1,5 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as an immediate result from the Young Turks' administration's arrangements to free the Turkish grounds of Christian populace to accomplish their container Turkic dreams.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Armenian Genocide The Armenian genocide was a horrible genocide that lasted between 1915 to 1923. During World War I, killing Armenians was the official policy of Ottoman rulers, who suspected Armenians of supporting Imperial Russia, one of their longest standing rivalries. The Armenian genocide was initiated by the Young Turks government of World War I. In 1915, over two hundred prominent, educated, and influential Armenian leaders of Constantinople were arrested and soon after were cruelly executed and their bodies were left hanging in public squares.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genocide Dbq

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Genocide is a human choice. It is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. Genocide is the result of hate, prejudices, hate language and the individuals or society’s choice to do nothing. After the devastating horrors of the Holocaust were exposed, the slogan of the time by the United Nations became “never again” (document B).The knowledge of the atrocities done to the Jewish people outraged members and produced this well intended ideal. The UN General Assembly of the time define genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group.” But the history of the twentieth…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armenian genocide was one of the most deadly genocides in history. In 1915, The Turkish government started a several year massacre that claimed the lives of nearly 1.5 million Armenians. The Armenians were viewed as infidels in the eyes of the Ottoman rulers. Different Armenian leaders were gathered and executed, which was the beginning of the massacre. Although some countries and people do not view this as a genocide, it should not have happened because the Armenians were only scapegoats to the problems occurring in the Ottoman Empire, in result 1.5 million lives were taken, and it was a crime against mankind.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On April 24, 1915, the Ottoman government started its systematic decimation of its Armenian population. With the decline of power in the Ottoman Empire and military losses experience at the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman government used the Armenians as a way to blame their problems on someone else, thus began the Armenian Genocide. The Ottoman government confiscated Armenian possessions, deported them to different countries, and massacred large numbers of Armenian people. Many of the deported people died of starvation, and for the Armenians who did live, they witnessed brutalities that we could not imagine. By the time these horrible events did stop in 1918, around 1.5 million Armenians had died. The Turkish government, which was part…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Armenian Genocide

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From 1915 to 1918, the Turkish leaders of the Ottoman Empire carried out the killings of 1.5 million Armenians living there at the time. Over the course of those terrible 3 years, innocent people were murdered with death marches, execution, drowning, burning and other inhumane ways. Turkey has refused to take blame, and even denied the genocide’s existence and occurrence. There has been much dispute about whether or not countries outside of Armenia and Turkey should recognize these mass killings of Armenians in 1915-16 as a genocide or something else. The Ottoman Empire was multinational, but had always favored Muslims to Jews and Christians, so when World War I started and a substantial group of Christian Armenians were still in Turkey and…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Armenian Genocide is also known as the Armenian Holocaust, The Armenian Massacres, and traditionally by Armenians, as Medz Yeghern. Total number of people killed has been estimated between 800,000 and 1.5 million. The genocide was carried out during and after World War 1 and implemented in two different phases. The Armenian Genocide is acknowledged to have been one of the first modern genocides. The Armenian Genocide was one of the most compelling human rights crises of World War I, helping to inspire Adolf Hitler three decades later to carry out the atrocities of World War II. The Armenian Genocide was a rough time back then. Hitler was killing many people during this time . Hitler was mainly killing jews and most families back then…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays