Preview

The Atomic Bomb: The Consequences Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
573 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Atomic Bomb: The Consequences Of War
In 1946 less than a year after the Atomic Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, John Hersey wrote a book that tells the stories of six different survivors of the bomb. He tells about what was happing right before the bomb was dropped, how they survived and tracked their lives after this tragic event. Reading through this amazing description on Hiroshima has been the only time I am not proud to be an American. Seeing the devastation that was caused by the Country I call home was really hard. Countless lives were destroyed by one act of war.
The first character that caught my eye was Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura, who was a widow that lived in Hiroshima. She barely escaped that disaster of the explosion that destroyed her home. After the bomb, she scrambled to find her three children, who were lucky to be alive.
…show more content…
It shows people what really happened and how the actions and decisions of one country have consequences to another. Even today we can see the consequences of war through the eyes of journalism. Hersey’s book was accurate in the eyes of the people he described. People may not describe the experience the same, but this book was about how it affected their lives.
It is hard to say if the atomic bomb was justified or not. Part of me wants to say no, there is ever a reason to drop an atomic bomb on someone. There is no reason to ever put innocent people in that kind of harm. However, on the other side we were at war and we did wat needed to be done to end the war. No life is worth more than someone else’s. From the American side, I could see it being justified. From the Japan side, there will never be any justification.
War is devastating and things are going to happen that people will never agree with. The bombing of Hiroshima is defiantly one of these circumstances. No matter what you think about the war or the justification of the atomic bomb, killing thousands of people will take its toll on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Taking account of both the extraordinary event chronicled and the very interesting role the author chooses to play as narrator of this story, I have chosen to use John Hersey 's Hiroshima as my primary example of documentation in the Cold War era. Hersey chose to take personal stories as his subject matter, using a very balanced but essentially human narration. As the definitive account of the horrors suffered by victims of the atomic bomb, Hiroshima maintains its journalistic essence throughout, despite dealing with a highly politicised and emotive subject. The only sense you have of John Hersey as anything more than a scribe are the occasional glimpses provided by his vocabulary and a slight variance in tone, just short of what you might expect from a completely objective standpoint. Hersey 's narration is also important in the context of 1946 (the year of its publication), and on this basis the fifth and final chapter, written and added in 1985, must also be seen in its specific lateral context.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At 8:15, Japanese time, August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. About a hundred thousand people were killed by the inhumane act of those Americans. John Hersey tells the story of six lucky survivors: Miss Toshinki Sasaki, Dr. Masakazu Fuji, Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, Dr. Terfumi Sasaki, and the Reverend Tanimoto. This book tells about how the lives of these six people changed forever.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Dbq Analysis

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were so many lost lives that had no reasoning to enter the war, but they were still killed in the process. It told one point of view from a teenager who had to pull through to survive and the statistics that prove how significant the bombs were to Japan.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Hersey's journalist narrative, Hiroshima focuses on the detonation of the atomic bomb, Little Boy, that dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Although over one hundred thousand people died in the dropping of the bomb, there were also several survivors. John Hersey travelled to Hiroshima to listen to the experiences of six survivors. Hersey uses his book to tell the story of six of these survivors (spanning from the morning the bomb fell to forty years later) through a compilation of interviews. Hiroshima demonstrates the vast damage and suffering inflicted on the Japanese that resulted from US deployment of the atomic bomb. And although depressing, humbling, and terrifying, this book was very good, interesting, and vivid; I would suggest it to anyone.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innocent families were forced to leave all their belongings because they were all subjected to contamination from the gases from the atomic bombs. Although they were lucky enough to escape the initial attack their lives were changed…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most significant theme in John Hersey's book "Hiroshima" are the long- term effects of war, confusion about what happened, long term mental and physical scars, short term mental and physical scars, and people being killed.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though many innocent lives were lost, the atomic bomb was justifiable to use in this case. More lives could have been lost if the U.S. would have invaded Japan. More specifically, the bomb saved Japanese lives. From the battle of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, we saw how extreme they were. If we were to take the mainland, we could have wiped out the entire nation, which is surplus compared to the lives lost from the bomb.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have investigated whether the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary and what effect the bombs had on ending the war in the pacific. The government of the United States of America were divided in opinions on how to use this weapon of mass destruction, and its impact on history. However now, the decision for dropping the atom bomb was an extremely complex and connected to a wide array of problems, and many of them simply went beyond the goal of the surrender of japan. Through analysing the many intertwined issues, I personally believe that the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified, as it had saved more lives, not just for the allied forces, but also…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I feel that they were not morally justified because the atomic bombs were extremely horrific. The bombings killed so many lives of innocent people and the horrible effects on the people for years after the bombing. The after effects of the bombing have caused health problems such as cancer and birth defects for decades later to people that weren’t even born yet.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone around the world will have their own opinion about the bombing on Hiroshima especially between the American’s and Japanese. I believe someone’s opinion makes an importance based off the generation he or she is from because American’s might’ve agreed to the bombing when it occurred because it was their generation when Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese so it was a form of deadlier retaliation because their people such as loved ones were victims. Therefore, they didn’t want their deaths to be in vein. Moreover, parents wouldn’t have to send their children off to war because the US made it end with the deadly weapon to cause a surrender. Just as much as our present generation would bomb ISIS they don’t because we would know the aftermath a lot of innocent people will die, get injured and lose their homes.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays