Preview

The Atomic Bomb's Effect On The Cold War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Atomic Bomb's Effect On The Cold War
The atomic bomb, a powerful weapon, launched an already weary world into a state of paranoia and political tension. This discovery, while spectacular in its own right, caused a need for new international laws. For safety reasons, a weapon of mass destruction cannot exist without regulations. Constant danger of instant death and nuclear explosions provoked more hostility than World War II itself. Without any defense against this cataclysmic force, the world was in desperate need for reassurance. The policy M.A.D.,which stands for mutually assured destruction, provided some consolation. M.A.D. had an even bigger effect on this time period than expectations allowed. Life and death hung in the balance of this piece of psychology merged into foreign …show more content…
had many effects on the Cold War, it also leads to the Free World’s victory over communism. The Cold War officially ended on December 25th, 1991, when an agreement was signed by Mikhail Gorbachev, the leader of the Soviet Union, and Ronald Reagan, president of the United States. Each country took part in the START, or the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks, and SALT II, or the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II, talks which approved of the regression of nuclear weapons. Both countries were instructed to stop mass producing nuclear weapons, which had been making the effects more dangerous and effective. The Soviet Union then fell apart due to communism’s inept ability in the advancement of the economy and infrastructure. This once vast country split apart into 15 smaller and different countries, including: Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Russia. Spending 27% of its money, the USSR used billions of dollars on their nuclear arsenal, crippling the Soviet economy and creating a depression in northern Europe.. The “credibility gap” in the Soviet Union increased substantially as the war went on. Fewer people than before believed in the power of a fascist government and plausibility on how and why events are occurring. As Mutually Assured Destruction was not a huge foreign policy, the people of the USSR worried that massive retaliation, the ability to respond by a military attack with nuclear weapons to devastate the enemy, could be a considered U.S. policy. Unlike the Soviet Union, who is still in a depression, the America’s economy was fine. Capitalism allowed corporations to grow and expand and while revolutionizing their products, while in communism, no one had the drive or access to resources to improve what it was they were selling. M.A.D. created a stable environment, allowing the nature of two different societies to run its course. The American economy allowed expansion and change while the communism’s stoic nature could not adapt to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as superpowers and subsequently a period of tension and hostility arose, known as the Cold War. During this time, a new possibility of complete nuclear destruction that would claim the lives of many emerged, therefore “the easing or relaxing of tensions” on both sides was needed, this period would be known as detente. Both countries had been guaranteed mutually assured destruction as they had both managed to stay ahead in the development of nuclear arsenals. By the late 1960s the Soviets had surpassed the United States in intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) by 1,300 to 1,054. Although the U.S was still ahead in various categories, it no longer enjoyed the immense nuclear advantage as before. However, neither side was prepared for the risk of a full scale war. Apart from the possibility of a disastrous nuclear war, factors in both the U.S and the Soviet Union also motivated the need for a relaxation of tensions.Both countries were in severe economic crisis due to the arms race and needed to diverge the funds to rebuild the economy. In the United States public opinion in America indicated that the Cold War was 'unjustifiable both economically and morally' due to the ongoing war in Vietnam. All these factors would eventually lead to the establishment of detente.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ronald Reagan is one of the most respected and well-liked presidents in the history of the United States and one of the most important accomplishments that he is accredited with is ending the Cold War. During this 50-year period in time, two of the world’s greatest superpowers were at odds, both having the power and ability to annihilate the other at any given moment. People at this time were forced to live in fear and terror, not knowing what the next day would bring or if they would even live to see tomorrow. The Cold War began, arguably, with several stands taken by the United States to aid the global community post World-War II, such as the Marshal Plan and the creation of NATO[1]. It can be argued that the Cold War also ended with several platforms originated from the United States. The man at the helm of the operation was Ronald Reagan. History shows that the strides this president took towards seemingly ending the war actually prolonged it. Strategies like brinkmanship and positive nuclear proliferation did not portray the message of a man whose goal was to end a war, but rather a man who had no problem continuing a war until his country won. Thus, Ronald Reagan did not end the Cold War. Reagan escalated the arms race, took a hostile approach to the Soviet Union, and was not as crucial as Gorbachev in ending the war.…

    • 9960 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scene in 1991 brought slowly-approaching breakdown of the Communist government. Before the complete failure of communism, the Berlin Wall in Germany fell down causing the Soviet Union to sign many agreements with the United States to signify the end of the Cold War. The same year, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) was signed in order to reduce the Soviets supplies of long-range nuclear…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ronald Reagan, Mikhail Gorbachev, And The End Of The Cold War. After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union became the two most powerful nations in the world. The U.S promoted democracy while the Soviet Union spread communism. After many years of tension between the super powers, two men, Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, came together to end the Cold War.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the next 3 years these leaders enforced the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force Treaty (INF) which “called for the destruction of the entire class of intermediate-range nuclear missiles...and put in place an unprecedented verification regime in which U.S. and Soviet officials would have the authority to inspect each other 's nuclear facilities. The INF Treaty was the greatest foreign policy accomplishment of the Reagan administration and was a major first step in disarming the Cold War.” (2008) These talks between Reagan and Gorbachev lead to the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which was argued and compromised over those years. Reagan left office in 1989 with the treaty in place. With the fall of the Soviet Union evident, n July 31, 1991 Bush and Gorbachev signed the treaty officially ending the Cold War.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, President Truman addressed the American people, informing them that one of the most influential events in history had occurred, “Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima,...That bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT...which is the largest bomb ever yet used in the history of warfare”. By the summer of 1945, millions of soldiers and citizens of the world had died after years of fighting in the Second World War. Although Europe’s involvement in the war had come to an end, the War in the Pacific between the United States and Japan had not found its conclusion. The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have come to be among the most debatable events in history. While some argue that because the bombings ended World War II, more lives of both American and Japanese soldiers were saved then there were victims of the bombs; others argue that more measures could have been attempted in order to possibly preventing the need for the bombs. The argument that the dropping of the bombs have prevented possible future wars from occurring has been made. However, the lasting environmental and social effects of the bomb have left…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wars have occurred for various different reasons all around the world, each nation involved using their best means of defensive and offensive attacks. Weaponry has been updated as time went on, leading us from arrows and bows to powerful guns. In the 1940s during World War II, however, one weapon in particular left a huge impact. The United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II was not justified due to the fact that it was ethically wrong, an excessive use of force, and unnecessary.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the end of World War two there have been debates about whether or not the U.S. should have dropped the atomic bomb or not. Many people argue that America had already won the war and that the bombs were uncalled for, but is this true (Doc K)? The U.S. made the right decision in dropping the atomic bomb because it led America to a victory, it ended the war quickly, and it saved more lives then it took.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The end of the Cold War came during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. While the Reagan administration increased military spending, the Soviet Union attempted to keep up with this arms race, but eventually ran out of funds and went broke trying to do so. As a result, the USSR could no longer afford the most basic of consumer products, so their economy and their country…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the final year of World War Two, the Allies prepared for what was anticipated to be a very costly and devastating invasion of the Japanese mainland. This was preceded by a U.S. firebombing campaign that destroyed 67 Japanese cities and the Battle of Okinawa, wherein almost 100,000 civilians died. Having developed the world’s first nuclear weapons in the Manhattan Project, the US Government made the decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first atomic bomb ever used in combat on the town of Hiroshima. Three days later, the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Combined, the bombs killed almost 150,000 people immediately, and they are attributed to more than 170,000 more…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays