Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Augustan Revolution

Powerful Essays
1533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Augustan Revolution
The Augustan Revolution

After the fall of the Roman Republic, Rome was in need of a leader who would employ major social change. During Augustus' reign in Ancient Rome, he created an Empire that would last several centuries. Augustus implemented many changes that transformed Rome in terms of the religion, the economy and social life. After the fall of the Republic, the political structure was a mess and was in dire need of change. It became apparent that the system of government that had been in effect for the last four centuries was no longer efficient and had become corrupt. In Book I of The Annals written by Tacitus, he begins by discussing the end of the Republic and that state that the government was in. “...the protection of the laws was unavailing, as they were continually deranged by violence, intrigue, and finally by corruption.”1 The failure of the Republic cannot be blamed solely on one person or on one event but rather on a series of events that had dire consequences. One of the main contributing factors to the Republic's demise was the complexity of the system. This is confirmed by Scott Gordon who wrote, "the Republic...was a system operating with a complex set of political and social institutions and established tradition".2 Before Augustus, the organization of the political structure was intricately and delicately designed to fit together; if one part was disturbed, the entire system suffered After Augustus, the structure of the government was uncomplicated, as it is a system based on a hierarchy with one central seat of sovereignty3. After continuous changes in the governmental structure, the foundations of the Republic began to crumble. The position of power in Rome was constantly shifting; first it was run by a Republican government, followed by a dictatorship, and then, with Augustus' reforms, was taken over by the Principate. Augustus chose to introduce the Principate in order to achieve the political stability that the failing Republic needed so desperately after the devastating civil wars. In ancient Rome, religion was a fundamental institution. Like Greece, ancient Roman society was polytheistic, meaning they worshiped several deities rather than one. The earliest form of Roman religion is recognized today as “animism”.4 Essentially, animism is the attribution of a spirit to a inanimate object.5 Each of these deities had a very specific sphere of influence. Augustine of Hippo was a critic of state religion, and in City of God, mockingly (yet accurately) provides a detailed account of the different deities. “They were not willing to entrust the care of all their land to just one deity...nor could they find just one goddess...to whom they could entrust their grain crops once and for all.”6 Augustine continues to explain that the Romans worshiped three gods who guarded the entrance to their homes, as well as four different gods were assigned to differing shapes of land. The earliest gods that are thought to have emerged in Rome are the gods of war, law, and production, also known as Jupiter, Juno and Minerva; together these three made up the Capitoline triad.7 Highly influenced, and with a growing association with the Greek Gods, Roman gods assumed similar mythological characteristics.8 These gods were not merely absorbed into their culture, but instead were identified with attributes of their own Roman gods.9
The reign of Augustus was a period of restoration. Along with other institutions, the religious system went under radical reconstruction. Augustus reinstated forgotten rituals, as well as restored traditional cults and ruined temples.10 Augustus himself provides a detailed account of all of his achievements entitled The Deeds of the Divine Augustus. Augustus proudly writes “in my sixth consulship, on the authority of the Senate, I rebuilt eighty-two temples of the gods in the city omitting none which should have been rebuilt at that time.”11 A crucial religious change that took place in the early Principate, was the development of rituals that concentrated specifically on Augustus. These rituals are generally seen as the foundations of the ‘Imperial Cult.’12 The most important factor within the Imperial Cult was the divinity of the emperor. While Augustus did not claim himself to be directly divine, he did claim the divinity of Rome with the worship of himself13. Augustus forbade any sort of formal worship in Rome, but did allow the worship cults of his genius or numen.14 The divine powers of Augustus, or numen, were honored on a regular basis.15 The establishment of this official cult signaled that Augustus was not receiving worship due to the gods, but at the same time signaled that there was very little difference between him and the gods.16 During the Augustan period, many changes were made within the religious structure. The entire institution of religion was transformed into an Imperial Cult that was focused on dedications to Augustus himself, and upon his death, was he promoted to divine status. During the Roman Republic and well through the Roman Empire, the Roman market was principally based on slave importation, trade and commerce. Foreign conquests and wars made slaves increasingly abundant and inexpensive17, therefore causing the economy to develop a reliance on slavery. However, at the end of the wars, the supply of slaves from abroad was lessened considerably.18 Another problem in regards to slavery, was that of informal manumission. Augustus fixed this problem with a series of laws that places restrictions on the freeing of slaves. First, in 17 B.C., Augustus placed legal restrictions on the children of informally manumitted slaves by allowing them to be free-born, but restricting their ability to attain land.19 Then in 2 B.C., He limited the number of slaves a master could free, and finally four years later, made it illegal for a master to free a slave during his lifetime (but could do so in his will, if he wished).20Augustus was not the only one to object to manumission. Dionysius, a Greek rhetorician, opposed to manumission not because of the high demand of slaves, but because of their moral character. Dionysius believed that the manumission of slaves would increase the crime rate in Rome. “...Others who are witnesses or even accomplices to their masters in...murders, in crimes...receive from their masters freedom as a favor or reward.”21 Augustus’ legislation was designed to keep the slave trade in check, as well as create a greater demand for free labour. The Roman Empire was started and continued on as a free trade society.22 Like Caesar, Augustus understood the potential in world-wide free trade with Rome at the centre.23 The economic prosperity that was seen by Rome was caused by several contributing factors. First of all, there was a rise in the middle classes, the bankers, merchants, and industrialists, who began to influence the state. 24 Another contribution was the new roads which made trade much easier. Augustus took special care of the roads by setting up a special commission for the main highways.25 Augustus’ main objective was clear and defined from the beginning as one of restoration and reconstruction. The new state that he worked so hard to build, was a redevelopment of the traditional Republican model, but in many ways, was an improved and better functioning version. In the Roman Empire, Augustus made several important reforms in society. Augustus’ sole purpose in his reforms was the restoration of tradition.26 Life in the Republic had become corrupt, and Augustus wanted to see a major social change. In his attempt to do so, he established several laws. First of all, because of the greed and corruption in the Senate, Augustus instituted requirements in order to gain entry into the Senatorial class. In order to reform the Senatorial order, one must have had served a term of military service, property requirements worth 200,000 denarii (eventually raised to 250,00) as well as personal integrity.27 Another way in which Augustus attempted to reestablish tradition into Roman society, was through laws regarding marriage, fertility, and fidelity. Augustus, concerned about the declining birth rate, promoted a piece of legislation that encourage people to have large families, called the Julian Laws, passed in 18 B.C.28 This legislation was largely unpopular and therefore unsuccessful, especially among the middle classes.29 These laws were established to correct the failing institution of marriage, making it more difficult to divorce, provided harsh punishments for adultery and seduction, and provided privileges to large families.30 Dio Cassius discusses these laws in Roman History. “Augustus placed heavier penalties on unmarried men and on woman without husbands. On the other hand, he offered rewards for marriages and for having children.”31 Furthermore, in A.D. 9, Augustus passed the Papia-Poppaean Laws which, according to Tacitus in Annals, supplemented the Julian Laws to encourage the penalties on celibacy.32 While Augustus’ reforms were not very successful, his efforts respected. These laws were respected so much, that they were kept intact for three hundred years, eventually becoming more relaxed.33 However indirect, Augustus’ impact on Roman society during the first century A.D. is quite clear. During the transition of the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire, Augustus made major social changes that transform Roman society. These changes were necessary due to the lack of congruity that was a result of the complex system that ruled the Republic.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Western Civ Essay Exam

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) Augustus was a key factor in bringing stability to Rome. Augustus was the first emperor and ruled from 31BC-14AD. Augustus intends to restore the Republic form of Government. He forms the New Order, which gives him full power and he rules as consul until 23BC. He is popular among the people because he brings peace after 60 years of war. He does this by reorganizing the army, which causes social stability, and he makes it so non-Romans can earn citizenship if they are a good fighter. He also creates the Praetorian, which are 9,000 of the best soldiers who act as the emperors body guards. Also, he reduces the number of members in the senate. He allows equestrians to become patricians, which causes social mobility. He throws parades and celebrations where the plebs can get free food. Augustus believes social moral has declined mainly in the rich and limits their extreme parties. He believes religion can cure so he builds many temples. He pioneers domes and arches. One famous temple is called the Pantheon, which is a temple for all Gods. The Cult of the State is formed and temples are built to worship Rome and Augustus’s spirit. Augustus makes adultery and crime and banishes his daughter after she cheats. He encourages marriage by heavily taxing single people. He leaves the Julio-Claudian legacy and his family rules for almost 100years. Augustus was the first good emperor in the Pax Romana. After Augustus dies, Rome’s stability ends and Tiberius takes over.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary reasons that Rome fell was they had poor government. First of all, Rome may have good rules, but they did not enforce them. For example, too many people were exempt from conscription. (Document B) This was a problem because they didn’t have enough people in the army because everybody turned down going to the army. Also, Rome failed to enforce their laws. According to Priscus, wealthy lawbreakers in Rome were able to get away with crimes. (Document E) This was…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    government was once a republic, but turned into a dictatorship under the rule of Julius…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Buddhism spread throughout China during the first century CE, people had a variety of responses, both positive and negative. Many Chinese accepted Buddhism and its beliefs, yet some criticized the religion and how foreign it was, having been originated in India. Documents 1, 2, 3, and 5 are supportive of Buddhism and documents 4 and 6 discourage it.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When he found out, he didn’t go to Rome straight away (danger) wen to Italy…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    revision notes

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -as romans took over more places and people they adjusted their institutions to the task of ruling an imperial capital city and distant places. Rather than having kings they installed 2 consuls or chief magistrates who would hold office for 1 year. This radical move from kingship to republic was accompanied by measures designed to prevent a return to one-man rule. Personal authority in the republic was constrained by a strict term limit on magistracies.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there were many contributing factors to the Roman Republic's decline over the course of several decades, most historians concur that the most important ones were the disintegration of political institutions and the emergence of strong military leaders who threatened the Senate's authority and the established power structure. Two interrelated factors primarily contributed to the Republican system's downfall: the widening social and economic divide between the affluent elites and the general populace, and Rome's military conquests, which made it more difficult for the government to control its soldiers and territories. The rise of wealthy and influential politicians who could influence elections and earn public support was one of the…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An ancient Greek politician, Polybius, argues in “Why Romans and not the Greeks Governs the World” that the Romans were so well off during their time because of the perfect government they created by combining a kingship, an aristocracy, and a democracy. He argues that, separately, the three governments all had certain strengths, but all sooner or later fell. Polybius states that separately “regular” governments sooner or later fall either to disorder or tyranny. In an effort the avoid a cycle the Greeks faced of greatness followed by a rapid decline, the Romans sought to create a perfect constitution with the best aspects of the three other governments and at the same time created an effective form of checks and balances.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A colossal factor that contributed to the fall of Rome is political instability and political corruption. Holding a political office in ancient Rome was said to pay very well. Politicians were not only running for government positions for power reasons, but also for money purposes. This skewed the validity of government leaders, often leading to officials focusing on themselves and their wealth and title, instead of what is best for the people of Rome. The validity of government leaders can be related back to present day America. Government officials now are not always qualified for their job. Instead, one might say they are running for their own gain, or to achieve a certain title, not really caring about the good of America.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays