Preview

The Balancing Act Between the Individual Interest and the Common Good

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Balancing Act Between the Individual Interest and the Common Good
The proper relationship between the individual's interests and the common good is a delicate balancing act that political philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Sophocles have tried to define. For philosophers such as Socrates and Plato, the common good trumps the individual interest when those interests interfere with what they believe is right for society as a whole. For others like Aristotle and Locke, a consensus on what the common good is must be defined within the reality that individual interests exists; meaning, they cannot be completely discarded for the good of society. I believe that in a free society, where the common good to doesn't have to be forced upon its citizens, the common good should impose upon the individual's interest only as much as citizens will allow without feeling such impositions are unreasonable restrictions on their lives. The reason that unreasonable restrictions on the individual's interests cannot be entirely ignored is that human nature doesn't allow for such selflessness. Since that is so, citizens will not allow for common good to exist in a society if it as the expense of their interests. However, small restrictions can be readily accepted it they believe that such impositions actually affords them the safety and opportunity to nurture their interests. For example, the property owner will gladly pay taxes to the government for the common good if they believe that the government will protect them those who would steal their land. In Aristotle's critic of Plato, Aristotle points out that humans cannot learn what the common good and what their proper role in society is without having individual interests. For example, Aristotle pokes holes in Plato's position that philosophers should not possess personal property as irrational as it does not take into consideration that property ownership "contributes to the overall rational structure of society and thus to people's happiness," which is a requirement before


Cited: DeLue, Steven. Political Thinking: Political Theory and Civil Society. New York: Longman, 2002 Fagles, Robert. The Three Theban Plays. New York: Penguin Classis, 1982

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Self-Interest or Community Interest . As read in Chapter 2 of the course text, Adam Smith argued that self-interest is a critical element in a society’s economic development. Karl Marx, by contrast, argued that society functions better when each of us is more community oriented.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    – Can be traced to the Greek philosopher, Aristotle (384- 322 BC), who argued that individual diversity and private owners hip are desirable 
> Individual economic and political freedoms are the ground rules on which a society should be based 
> Welfare of society best served by allowing the pursuit of individual economic-interest…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the greatest issues with the idea that most people are motivated to act in their own best interest is that it presents a difficulty when trying to promote economic development. This often has negative effects on prices and on the environment. A thriving economy, certain factors are necessary:…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The notion of the common good, as MacIntyre (1998) understands it, differs fundamentally from the notions in which the good of a community is logically constructed posterior to the goods of its members. To be more specific, MacIntyre (1998: 240) fiercely criticizes the concepts of the common good in which the good of the whole can "be arrived at by summing the goods of the parts" or by attaining public goods. Certainly, says MacIntyre (1998:239-240), it is a mistake to think that the practice of the common good "is no more than the summing of the goods pursued by individuals as members" of a particular community. Community, MacIntyre emphasizes, is not merely an instrument employed by individuals to attain their own goods. Otherwise, members'…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The public interest state has long been considered the cornerstone of democratic government, existing exclusively to identify and defend the public’s safety and welfare through government programs and activities. The public interest is synonymous with the common interest for the purpose of running the state. However, the idea that the common interest can be easily defined in order to be defended is conjecture in itself. For decades, in an effort to serve the implied common interest of the people, governments in all corners of the world continued to grow, taking on responsibilities that could be absorbed by the private sector. In some cases, governments became unproductive behemoths that harmed the public more than they represented it. Since…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The success of a society is reliant on individual sacrifice. Ambitions driven by selfishness are detrimental to a community. Numerous instances of human history and literature have demonstrated the importance of limiting self-interest.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "common good" is a central and unifying principle of social ethics. It is the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups and their individual members relatively thorough and ready access to their own…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is not acceptable is for a person in power (authoritative figure) to force individuals to pay taxes or render some type of helpful service to benefit individuals in a particular society of social class. The problem with creating public objectives, to be sustained by the government, is that these objectives reduce the perspectives in which they are to be attained. They dictate exactly who will benefit from public assistance, for exactly what reason. Furthermore, Rand states that under no condition will every individual benefit from a particular public venture; hence, the tactics of collectivized ethics proclaims that some individual lives are more valued than…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that this was the way to conduct the ideal form of political justice. Everyone must do what best suites their nature and not pry into any business other than that which is naturally suited to them. According to Plato, his society was separated into three roles: Producers, Rulers and Guardians. Producers produce the goods (carpenters build, artists paint, doctors heal, etc), philosophers rule, and Guardians fight and protect. Specialization guarantees that each class remains in fixed relations of power. Warriors abide by the commands of the rulers, producers to not interfere with political affairs, each person worries only about their own business to which they are suited, participating in other aspects only as far as obeying the rules that are created by the rulers,…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to literature, conflicting perspectives are often woven artfully through the fabric of the text. The Shakespearean tragedy ‘Julius Caesar’ and Rob Sitch’s film ‘The Castle’ are two such pieces of literature that examine a range of conflicting perspectives. Humans are innately biased and self-interested, and it is our inability to separate a situation from bias and self-interest that often results in conflicting perspectives. Both composers explore this concept through the use of a variety of poetic, dramatic and cinematic devices.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato vs Locke

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plato's theory hand picks guardians to become Philosopher Kings. These kings are those with "Gold" Souls, and in fact do not wish to become such a hierarchal figure. Plato chooses Guardians who do not wish to earn the title of Philosopher Kings because without desire to rule, the only reasoning left is for the good of others, and not a selfish feat. It's an obligation to put one's high knowledge to good use. Locke puts the people in charge of choosing their government, and feel that government's main task is to protect property. Additionally, Locke feels that in the state of nature one is able to live, act and dispose of possessions however one feels necessary to themselves. With this in mind, is it even conceivable that one would choose a government without their complete personal interests in mind? Trying to construct a perfect society, when everyone has so many personal attachments to obtain to, then ideas would not be set in the focus of a whole society, but on the individual's well being. When following Plato's theory on the Philosopher Kings ruling for the good of others, would not the good of others include their safety in society? And thus protection against possessions? In an ideal regime whereby it is classified as ‘utopia' things such as protection are not questioned, as there would be no wrongdoing for protection to need to come into play for.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare Vs Common Welfare

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our nation protects the common welfare while protecting our natural rights. There is controversy, on some issues, whether the common welfare, the whole country, is more significant than the individual rights of the people. However, one simply cannot be more vital since they correspond with each other.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We must learn, from both today’s world and Plato, what the right amount of privilege the individual can have without it causing too much of a negative impact on society. I do not believe that we will ever have a clear, definite, answer of whether Plato’s concept on freedom would actually work within the society we have today. Nonetheless, we can take his values and try to adapt them to mold to our society’s ways. Freedom can go one of two ways, good or bad, and this all depends on how we use it within our world. The end goal of the Republic was to reach justice within civilizations and Plato did come up with a sensible plan. This plan may not work perfectly with each generation, but there in lies our jobs as individuals. We, as society’s both past and future, are responsible for figuring out justice within our cultures. Every generation is different in their own way, so if we take Plato’s values and attempt to mold it into our own lives, hopefully we will find our own forms of justice and freedom within our…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utopia Quotes

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Wherever there is private property, where everything is measured in terms of money, it is hardly ever possible for the common good to be served with justice and prosperity.” (46)…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lasswell, H. (1958). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How?, New York, McGraw-Hill, p. 3. Leftwich, A. (2004). What is Politics?, Oxford, Polity Press, p. 5.…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays