In the present day there are some products that Nike would not have to do and at the same time do very well. One of their brands is Air Jordan, and in my opinion Nike is able to go without this brand. Having a sub brand under their big Nike one is economically right, as both Nike and Air Jordan are producing the same products for the same sport. Therefore since they make very similar products Air Jordan should merge together with Nike and that way it will be better for their economy. Nike is also a producer of baseball equipment. One of the products that they could eliminate is the production of baseball gloves because it has barley part in this market as Rawlings dominates most of the baseball glove market. And Nike is not a huge competitor against them since there are bigger companies that could challenge them but Nike is not one. That was they will save money on the production of these baseball gloves that do not sell well. Similarly, Nike also produces tennis clothing and shoes. But these products are extremely similar to the ones under their running products, similarly to the Air Jordan situation. Once again it would be better economically to merge these two brands together to increase the profit of Nike as a whole.…
Freire describes the “banking” concept of education by saying that “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiqués and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat” (Freire 244). He uses the metaphor of depositor and depositories to relate to a bank. The organized mindlessness of business between a bank and its contents is portrayed as the style of teaching which is seen as ineffective. It is seen in his eyes as unfavorable because the student does not have an opportunity to form his/her own ideas and think critically. On the other hand, Freire proposes the problem-posing style of education. He explains how power and authority are both mutual between the student and the teacher when he says, “The teacher is no longer merely the-one-who-teaches, but one who is himself taught in dialogue with the students, who in turn while being taught also teach” (249). Freire stresses the importance of problems for the mind in order for critical thinking to take place. Because of the mind is at work, people are able to form their own opinions and ideas instead of just storing information and accepting it. Even though Freire recommends problem-posing education, the fact of the matter is that most people are faced with the banking style of teaching, like Rodriguez in his essay, “The Achievement of Desire”.…
In Paulo Friere’s article “The Banking Concept”, Paulo argues that the banking method is an efficient way of learning in the education system. The students are to sit down, stay quiet, received information, memorize it, and then remember it. Since this method requires them to simply memorize the information, the students don’t completely understand fully the information that they are taking in. The underlying message here about the banking concept is that the teachers feed students the information, acting as if they are completely informed about the whole subject, and then suggesting that the student knows nothing. There is no relationship established between the student and the teacher. The student…
“Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat” (Freire 318). The comparison of the teacher-student relationship to the operation of a bank sums up the “banking” concept of education, in this form of education, the teacher is superior to the students and feels as if he is all knowing and the students are merely ignorant. Teachers who use this concept do not realize that it takes away from the student’s imagination and creativity, and it only allows the students to accept the world as it was taught to them.…
Last week, I read an article called the banking concept of education which is written by Paulo Freire, a Brazilian author who contributed to the world greatly as an educator and influenced the field of education. What is banking concept? The banking concept is an example to describe a method that students are regarded as a container and to be filled with different kinds of information and knowledge by teachers. What the students can do is just accept the things that they learned and memorize it. Freire demonstrates that the students are regarded as a bank and teachers “deposit” the knowledge into them. The biggest problem of the banking concept of education is that the students will never think carefully and they will lose their creativity and imagination without their critical thinking. Students just acknowledged the world should be like and inhibited by too many restrictions of their study. Freire demonstrates that the banking concept of education supposes that all the students are innocent. However, learning form the teacher is the only method for the students. The problem between the educator and the students won’t disappear although there’s a new curriculum introduced. Freire thinks the most effective way to solve the problem is Problem-posing concept of education.…
My experience in the education system was not anything like ‘The “Banking” Concept of Education’ critiques it. It specifies on critiquing the teacher-student relationship and I would like to argue a few points made in this reading. Such as, how the teacher presents himself or herself, the relationship involving the teacher and student, and how students never discover that they also educate the teacher. I could argue these points through experiences I’ve had over my years as a student throughout the education system, I will focus on high school.…
His idea that the students are an "empty vessel" is at the core of the banking concept where the curriculum does not take into consideration the needs of the students as libertarians, the means by which men and women deal with reality in either a critical or creative way. He makes this point because in education today the information is chosen by the educator as the "depositor" and "deposited" into the student; "the scope of action allowed the student extends only as far as receiving, filing and storing; which the students patiently receive, memorize and repeat" (319). The more a teacher does this to his students the more reality is taken away from them to learn the true meanings of life. This can be related back to Freire 's argument against the education system, because one can only memorize things for so long, after that one will lose his true purpose in the world. To go against the system of education Freire has established new methods to turn the idea of education aroundThe method of education that Freire asserts as an alternative to the banking concept is to encourage students to question and pursue the world. He calls this his "problem-posing" method on education (325). This change in focus is facilitated by a shift in the student-teacher relationship; the student learns from the teacher, and the teacher learns from the students. This is a relationship where all…
To start with, I will focus on discussing the pedagogical level. In the banking concept of education, the teacher is like the depositor and students act as empty banks. The teacher deposits knowledge of students without considering whether students accept it or understand it. In this mode of education, the teacher uses personal existential experience to educate students that the world is static and unchangeable; students are alienated from knowledge. Because they haven’t independent study ability. Students consider teachers as the authority; they mechanically receive knowledge and try only to remember everything taught by the teacher. On a deeper level, I want to explain the relationship between individuals and society under the "banking" concept of education in contrast with…
Have you ever thought about that time when you were empty? I mean knowledge wise. It can be referred back to the infant stage or even that time in history class when you had no idea what imperialism was or what it is about. Well according to Freire this is where “ The Banking Concept” takes place. As he mentions on page 477, the banking concept is basically saying that students are empty containters that will be filled with education by their teachers.…
Today’s education system has been reduced to teachers assume the position of holders of knowledge and who are supposed to then transfers said knowledge to students. Paul Friere (1993) in his article “the banking concept of education” has demonstrated this aspect…
“Banking Concept of Education” by Paulo Freire underlines the theme of miscommunication between students and the teacher. A lot of the passage is biased by the author, pointing fingers at both the student and teacher. The passage repetitively emphasizes that though teachers spout out important information, rather than learning the material, students purely memorize and then forget it instead. This fault is called the banking concept, which is contradictory to the point of education due to the give and take factor of students borrowing information but not utilizing it. Paulo Freire suggests the solution of problem-posing, meaning rather than seeing teachers as an authority who knows everything, the community should work together in striving for intellectualism.…
In The “Banking “Concept of Education Freire discusses the conventional way of teaching as a trap that creates an oppressive environment in education and cripples students in their knowledge and their ability to take action later in life. Freire discusses that the teacher and student relationship contributes heavily to this oppressive atmosphere in the classroom and encourages ignorance on behalf of the student. I challenge Friere’s thoughts of escaping from education as we know it today; and instead combine the traditional styles of the past and the new problem posing solution of the future together. Reflecting on my experiences in education and analyzing the text of Friere I have developed my own theory of education. Students need to believe they are the future and need to be prepared to act and fill the roles they are given in times of success and times of failure. A balanced education will prepare them for all the situations that they will be faced with in their future outside the classroom.…
Both Paolo Freire and Richard Rodriguez have spent most of their lives dedicated to education. While for different reason, Rodriguez for his own education and Freire for the education of others, they both have put in many long hours. Through Freire’s life he has spent a lot of time coming up with an education system that he feels is best for the learners. That system is what he calls problem posing. He talks about what an effective problem posing classroom looks like in his essay, “The Banking Concept of Education”. In this essay, he also talks about the version of education that opposes problem posing education, banking education. Banking education is portrayed as a lecture intensive classroom focused around memorization. In turn,…
A key element that Rodriguez and Freire both speak of is banking education. Freire feels that this type of education is almost useless. Banking is no more than just listening to someone speak at you and then regurgitating the information. Both speak about education in the context of the student-teacher relationship. The banking theory of education only allows for the teacher to rule over the classroom and allows for little interaction with students. Banking turns students into "receptacle" (pg 260) bins that are crammed with information that the teacher chooses to fill…
Throughout the duration of his essay on the banking method of education, Paulo Freire makes his opinion clear on not necessarily favoring it. The banking method simply states that while students are in school, they become submissive to the teacher. In doing this, Freire says that, the teacher will make the student believe that they are ignorant and that the teacher is always right. To have a lucrative system, teachers and student both need to be open to learning off of each other. Freire writes “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor (216).” This is true in numeral areas not only in the county, but around the world. In my seventh grade year, we were to write…