The Battered Woman Syndrome And Self-Defense Analysis
Source III: Faigman, David L. “The Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-Defense: A Legal and Empirical Dissent.” Virginia Law Review, vol. 72, no. 3, 1986, pp. 619–647.
Early within this article author, Faigman reveals that he supports the testimony of batter women syndrome as self-defense against an abusive partner. Faigman’s article argues that the courts should allow juries to consider valid social science research regarding the circumstances surrounding the battered woman’s case as well as her own history of abuse in evaluating her self-defense claim. Faigman lays out his argument in three distinct parts, first discussing the topic of self-defense. He then connects this between the theory of battered woman syndrome and the self-defense doctrine.
Early within this article author, Faigman reveals that he supports the testimony of batter women syndrome as self-defense against an abusive partner. Faigman’s article argues that the courts should allow juries to consider valid social science research regarding the circumstances surrounding the battered woman’s case as well as her own history of abuse in evaluating her self-defense claim. Faigman lays out his argument in three distinct parts, first discussing the topic of self-defense. He then connects this between the theory of battered woman syndrome and the self-defense doctrine.