TOPIC: The belief that humans are determined is essential to the study of behavioral science.
Introduction
We usually believe that what we do or choose to do is our own free will. We decide what to choose. But the question is that are we really free to do what we wish? Is it our own choice or are we determined to do things due to natural laws of the universe? Different philosophers have a different point of view while answering these questions. Some, such as Baron d’Holbach (1723-89) believed that people do not have a free will or any choice; there is always a reason behind what they do. Whereas, on the other hand, another philosopher known as John Stuart Mill believed that determinism and freedom are compatible. Furthermore, there are also philosophers who are against determinism and believe in free will; we make choices from our own free will.
The motive of this essay is to emphasis that “THERE ARE LIMITATIONS TO HOW MUCH WE HAVE FREEDOM, BUT, WE DO HAVE SOME FREEDOM OF CHOICES TO CHOOSE FROM”. This essay will focus on three different theories that relates to free will and determinism. These theories consist of hard determinism, soft determinism and indeterminism.
Hard Determinism
In hard determinism, the people’s behavior and actions are fully determined by external factors; people do not have a free will or ethical accountability to make their own choices. Everything that takes place in the universe is fully determined to be that way. There is no such thing as choices, free will or just randomness in hard determinism and everything that happens is due to the physical laws which govern the universe. Baron d’Holbach (1723-89) was a French philosopher believed in determinism and had written a book known as The System of Nature which related to determinism. He believed that humans are born without their own consent, their organization does not depend upon them, their ideas comes to them involuntarily and their habits are in the power of