Preview

The Benefits of Cohabitation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Benefits of Cohabitation
Cohabitation also called consensual union or de facto marriage; refer to unmarried heterosexual couples living together in an intimate relationship. Until recently, cohabitation as such is not a new phenomenon, there have experienced rapid growth in their cohabitation rates, particularly those in Europe. However, it is often seen as entailing fewer responsibilities at the legal, economic, and even emotional levels, so the author of the article thinks that the disadvantages of cohabitation are more than benefits.
Actually, what are the reasons made the author think that? And what are the disadvantages? In the article, it shows the characteristics define the essential boundaries between cohabitation and married, such as age, fertility, stability, social acceptance, and state recognition. In the addition, there are 3 main consequences of cohabitation; there are marital stability, gender equality, and children.
In marital equality, the author would intuitively expect marriages preceded by cohabitation to be more stable than those not preceded by cohabitation. However, cohabitation negatively influences the quality and longevity of marriages. People who living together generally have individualistic attitudes that make them less committed to marital union and more likely to seek divorce in response to marital problems. It is because it emphasizes individual needs and demonstrates that there are alternatives to marriage. In gender quality, cohabitation is often perceived as a trial marriage, women may select men who are willing to share domestic work. Although cohabitors profess more liberal gender attitudes, the reality is a different matter. Those children live in a cohabitation household are stresses the importance of understanding the effects. Cohabitating household have fewer economic resources than married household. Moreover, children in cohabitating households are likely to experience family instability because many cohabitation relationships terminate.
In my

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Your life can set up a disaster or can make it worth so much. In David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of Our Union,” the topic of marriage and divorce are discussed. This paper shows and discusses the chances of divorce, the statistics on cohabitation, and economic benefits of being married. This paper is a summary of the article. This topic is important because it affects our everyday lives (Popenoe and Whitehead 390-402).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in our text, various factors can bind married couples together, such as economic interdependencies, legal, social and moral constraints, relationship, and amongst other things. In the recent years some of these factors have diminished their strengths. The modern generation sees marriage in a different perspective altogether. Individuals today feel they are stable independently, they do not need to rely on their spouse for emotional or financial support. Many are career driven and soar to conquer their dreams over settling down with a family. Such untraditional views have increased divorce rates.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past forty years marriage, divorce and cohabitation rates have fluctuated significantly. For example, the number of divorces has increased from 27,000 in 1961 to 153,000 by 2006, whilst the Telegraph newspaper reported that ‘one in six people are cohabiting as marriage rates decline’. Why is this? There are multiple reasons for these varying statistics.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to assess reasons for the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation; it is necessary to first establish the term marriage and cohabitation. Marriage is traditionally conceived to be a legally recognized relationship, between two consenting adults, that carries certain rights and obligations. Cohabitation is an arrangement whereby couples who are not legally married live together in partnership within the common law. Cohabitation has become so widespread that the term itself is now rarely used. I will now critically examine the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr Josh Gallagher

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many reason for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation due to many significant social attitude changes such as secularisation, there are also many more that affect marriage and cohabitation but one that has affected the pattern mostly is feminism, this is shown in a survey that shows in the last 40 years the number of marriages has dropped enormously by up to one hundred thousand marriages and is still declining whereas the cohabitation rate has increased dramatically by 50%. These outline one of the many reasons for changing patterns in marriage and cohabitation.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last 40 years marriage rates have declined significantly while the number of couple’s cohabitating has risen rapidly. This is due to our changing society where equality, laws, social acceptance and religions have all contributed into the way we view marriage and relationships. In the 1970’s there were around 400,000 first marriages whereas, in 2011, there were 248,000. The average ages of people getting married have also increased from 25 for men and 23 for women in 1961 to 36 for men and 33 for women in 2011. Cohabitation is a big factor in the decreasing number of marriages with people using it as either an alternative to marriage entirely, or a ‘trial marriage’ which just delays the time of a couple’s marriage.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation is an arrangement where two people who are not married live together in an intimate relationship, usually an emotionally and/or sexually intimate one, on a long term or permanent one. Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal in certain countries, like America. But due to a change in the law, Cohbitation is now a common way of living, all over the world. As well as sex/birth outside of marriage, leaving at least 50% to 60% of couples cohabitating, this started in the late 1990s. This lead to the decline of traditional nuclear families as people want to live in companionship because nearly half the amount of marriages now end in divorce, as well as cohabitating being cheaper, easier and less hassle. The new right see the decline in the traditional nuclear family and increase on family diversity as negative trends on modern society. From the new right perspective, these changes are the cause of many social problems in Britain today.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In analyzing the recent growth of cohabitation he finds that its practice began as a short term method of reducing the possibility of divorce as cohabitation was viewed as a sort of "trial marriage". However, as time has progressed this trial period has been severely lengthened and has less frequently yielded marriages as its outcome. Through cited statistics he shows that while in the 1970's sixty percent of cohabitations resulted in a marriage within three years, that number has been drastically reduced to thirty three percent in the 1990's. Cherlin shows that cohabitation has become so prevalent in the United States that the laws of the country have had to be changed to adapt to this recently developed living situation.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Racism In The Great Gatsby

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    But generally fruitful person is able to receive rewards and these come in the form of subsidies for married couples who have dependants. For those with families that deviate from the norm, penalties include the legal requirement to support one’s family, and legal and monetary requirements that make divorce expensive. In addition to that, the supposition that married people live more inexpensively as compared to singles may act as a guide to two single people getting bigger support: cohabitation principles, giving people who live together preferential treatment, making them feel married is a technique used to ensure fair play with married…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cohabitation has increased as well, as there has been a decline in stigma attached to it. Couples may decide to live together before considering marriage and children. The younger generation is more likely to accept cohabitation than older generations, this is linked to one of the Rapoport’s family diversities, generational diversity.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goodwin, P., & Mosher, C. A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. Washington: National Center for Health Statistics.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jessica

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Conflicting studies on the effect of cohabitation on subsequent marriage have been published. In countries where the majority of people disapprove of unmarried individuals living together, or a minority of the population cohabits before marriage then marriages resulting from cohabitation are more prone to divorce. But in a study on European countries, those where around half of the population cohabits before marriage, cohabitation is not selective of divorce-prone individuals, and no difference in couples that have cohabited before and after marriage is observed.[30][31] In countries such as Italy, the increased risk of marital disruption for people who experienced premarital cohabitation can be entirely attributed to the selection of the most divorce-prone into cohabitation.[32]…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has also been a dramatic increase in cohabitation over the last 25 years, but it might be equally overplayed. The new right commentators have claimed cohabitation as less stable than marriage, cohabiting couples are claimed to be less happy and fulfilled, and more stressed and depressed. However, for people see it as an alternative to marriage. About 60% subsequently marry. But some of the people in these cohabiting relationships are may be waiting for divorce.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Six Thinking Hats

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    White hat: a recent research in Hanoi shows that 6.5% of 691 students surveyed cohabit. Students who are less interactive have the highest percentage of cohabitation. 47.1% cohabiting students think they have permission of parents, 45.1% of those live together over one year. 100% have sexual relations and only 48% have safe sex. 43% abort when getting pregnant and just 36% get married. The relationship ending is over 90%. The reason for cohabitation is to spend more time together, to share the expense, to have sex, to be up to date etc. The indirect reason is because of the sex revolution of 1970s in Western world.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays