Preview

The Benefits Of Same Sex Simulation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Benefits Of Same Sex Simulation
The same-sax marriage was a disputed topic that everyone would like to speak, but no any political will or popular sentiment for it until recently. In the case United States v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples are recognized by federal law and can receive federal benefits which the estate would have qualified for a marital exemption, and no taxes would have been imposed. Edith Windsor, who married to Thea Clara Spyer in Canada in 2007, after she lost her spouse in 2009, she could not be entitled to the estate tax benefits because they were same-sex couple. Even though their marriage was recognized by New York state law, she still had to pay $363,000 estate tax if she wanted to inherit her spouse’s house
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Edith Windsor: Case Study
    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Edith Windsor: Case Study

    Edith Windsor the woman who made history on June 26th, 2013 fought the Supreme Court claiming that Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. Edith and her partner Thea Spyer were together for 40 years and married in 2007. After her partner died in 2009, she could not receive the same benefits that a opposite sex couple could and was told to pay $363,000 in estate taxes. With DOMA, Edith was not considered a spouse by the federal government and this made her ineligible to receive the tax benefits of a married couple. The federal tax code recognizes that it is unfair to tax spouses when property is received upon death. Also some states have a benefit that exempts Property Tax upon a spouse 's death. Which in a heterosexual marriage if a spouse passes the property is just passed along as without paying estate taxes. Edith spent an estimated $600,000 to pay the state and federal taxes to receive her partners’ home. This injustice made her fight for her rights which brought the case of the United States v. Windsor. Her courage has opened new doors for same sex partners.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    US Vs. Windsor: Case Study
    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    US Vs. Windsor: Case Study

    U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario, Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple, Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married, Spyer died, and left all of her estate to her wife, Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, she was denied because of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which excluded same-sex partners in definition of marriage and spouse. Windsor went on with the issue, paid estate taxes over $300,000, but Window was denied the refund. She then challenged DOMA saying Section 3 was unconstitutional. After a few years with the case working its way through the courts, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Edith Windsor And Thea Spyer
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Case Of Edith Windsor And Thea Spyer

    If the U.S government recognized their marriage, the estate would have qualified for the spousal exemption and Windsor would not have had to pay any taxes. Windsor started this lawsuit seeking a full refund of the federal estate tax. Also, Windsor proclaimed that DOMA’s Section 3 is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment. The issue here is whether the Defense of Marriage Act violates the right to equal protection of same-sex couples who are legally married under…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Garden State Equality Vs Dow Case Study
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garden State Equality Vs Dow Case Study

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Edith Windsor
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Case Of Edith Windsor

    In 2009, after the death of her wife Thea Spyer, Edith Windsor, a white female residing in New York, submitted a petition to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses. She was denied from doing so by the section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which only recognized the term “spouse” in marriages between man and woman. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) denied Windsor’s petition to claim the federal estate tax for surviving spouses due to the exemption not being applicable to same-sex marriages. In 2010, Windsor sued the federal government in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, pursuing a refund because DOMA singled out legally married same-sex couples. The third section of DOMA is unconstitutional…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Homosexuals
    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Homosexuals

    On the other hand, it is also a homosexuals human and moral rights. Every homosexual has the right to be jubilant in the same way that heterosexuals are. Each individual has their own morals, although some may not agree. A USC Aiken senior, Micah Hurtt, says, "Some people cannot separate the religious aspect. It is not a matter of religious right or wrong morals; it is inequality." Even though heterosexuals have different morals, homosexuals still have the right to be…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

    In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    History Brief Windsor V. Us
    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History Brief Windsor V. Us

    The Supreme Court of the United States has before them a great decision to make in the case of United States v. Windsor. This will set precedent in United States federal law that allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages granted under the laws of other states. The court will deliberate on the section of Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. This historic ruling will mark a monumental step, whether backwards or forwards, in the marriage equality movement.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edith Windsor Argumentative Essay
    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edith Windsor Argumentative Essay

    Born in 1929, Edith Windsor became a widow following the death of her wife, Clara Spyer in 2009. Edith Windsor was entitled to receive the entire estate left behind by Spyer in her will. Windsor attempted to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, however, due to section 3 of DOMA, the state of Internal Revenue Service failed to recognize the same-sex marriage as legitimate and ordered Windsor to pay estate taxes of $363,053 in order to receive the estate even though the state of New York had recognized the marriage as of 2008. If their marriage had been recognized by the IRS, Windsor would have qualified for the marital exemption and not had to pay any taxes to receive the property. Windsor filed a lawsuit against the federal government in 2012 claiming the lack of tax exemption due to the same-sex status of the marriage to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled a 5 to 4 ruling in favor of Windsor declaring section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Windsor vs. US
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Windsor vs. US

    Because of federal government not recognizing same-sex couples, edie had to pay heavy inheritance taxes not required to harried heterosexuals…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Same Sex Marriage: Societal Suicide By Charles Colson
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same Sex Marriage: Societal Suicide By Charles Colson

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional
    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Doma Unconstitutional

    Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling
    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Racial Profiling

    One common problem that plagues gay and lesbian couples that are denied the right to marry is their inability to claim their partner’s social security after he or she is dead. The Human Rights Campaign, which work to achieve equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, is supporting the effort to attain survivor benefits for domesticate partners. They believe, “Any alteration to the Social Security system must include partners of gays and lesbians in its definition of survivor” Currently, there are no programs that give homosexuals survivor benefits like the ones that are provided for heterosexuals who are married or divorced. Gay and lesbian partners are not able to claim benefits of their decease, regardless of the fact that all working citizens’ heterosexuals or homosexual pay into the Social Security system for survivor benefits. Sadly, this leaves many gay and lesbian couples with an unstable retirement. The most disturbing fact is that even though homosexuals and heterosexuals pay the government for survivor benefits, even people who divorced can even claim survivor benefits whereas a lifelong gay/lesbian partner cannot. This is blatant discrimination against people of different…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Unions in Arizona for Same Sex Couples
    • 3842 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Civil Unions in Arizona for Same Sex Couples

    Same-sex couples have long asked for the right to enjoy the same benefits as couples of different genders. Currently, same-sex couples are denied 1,138 rights given by federal law to traditional couples. Among these rights is the ability to make decisions for the spouse in case of a medical emergency; for same-sex couples, this authority goes to the next of kin. In relation to medical emergencies, same-sex couples are also denied visitation rights, meaning that if a spouse is hospitalized, the significant other can be denied entrance to the room. Another benefit that is denied to same-sex couples is the right to Social Security benefits upon the death of a spouse. Traditionally, the Social Security benefits go to the surviving spouse, but in same-sex unions, the benefits simply stop. Similar to Social Security benefits are employee benefits, which are provided to the partners of traditional unions, but denied to same-sex couples. In 2009, the federal government presented an act to the floor of Congress that would provide employee benefits to the spouses of same-sex unions employed by the government. Another point of contention is the right to adoption, a right that is denied to same-sex couples. The stability of same-sex relationships has also been called into question by opponents. One benefit that is often overlooked due to the fact that it does not pertain to same-sex couples is the benefit to the economy of same-sex unions through the accumulation of disposable income.…

    • 3842 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights In America Essay
    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Rights In America Essay

    The United States of America, through its core democratic values, is greatly divided on civil rights issues because of the weight of consideration given to all who can voice their opinions. This gives rise to many topics of strong debate, delaying progressive action due to liberties granted by the Bill of Rights, and implications of impeding civil rights discrepancies. Currently there is a major debate in the white house, concerning the legal rights of gay people, mainly their right to have a marital status recognized by all levels of government. In 1996, there was an act, Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA), that was approved that made clear what the definition was of the words “marriage” and “spouse”. This definition was: “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics