Preview

The Best Overall Picture of Reality

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Best Overall Picture of Reality
Intro to Philosophy
The Best Overall Picture of Reality
Questions in life may not have a definite final answer. This is exactly what the study of Philosophy poses. Thinkers have existed since the days of Socrates trying to answer the most difficult questions in life. Some of these questions do not follow a certain criteria for there to be one correct answer. These types of questions may be opinion based until the end of time. One of these questions is what is the best overall picture of reality? It is the metaphysical question that has been asked by many philosophers throughout history, but there still is no final answer that can be written in stone. For this reason I disagree with Aristotle’s view on reality because most of his theories have already been disproven. Reality can be different to each unique human mind.
Aristotle is one of the greatest philosophers that have ever lived. He offered answers to questions in life from his learning from another great philosopher, Plato. His beliefs of the ultimate nature of reality focused on a teleological universe. This meant that everything was moving towards its telos or goal in life. He said that materials are fully real and are what senseperception reveals. “Tode ti” was his famous quote meaning this thing here. These real materials in life were all trying to move to their telos. They were very mechanical, and were just moving because it was their goal to reach during their life time.
Examples that Aristotle offered dealt with the five ultimate material elements of reality that he established. These elements of reality are earth, water, air, fire, and either. Each of these elements were moving to get to their telos, or final goal in life. He clearly defined the movement of each of these elements. Earth, such as rocks, fall to the ground to get to the center of the earth. Water also falls to the center of the earth and also lies on top of earth. Air is trying to rise above water. Finally

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summing up from these four points Aristotle came to a conclusion that something must exist which causes the motion and change to occur without being moved itself and the 'uncaused change' must be eternal. Aristotle reached this conclusion by observing that if something can change, it exists in one 'actual' state and has the 'potential' to become another state, for example, an actual child is potentially an adult and a cow in a field is potentially a piece of roast beef. He realised that if things come to existence they must be caused to exist by something else and if something is capable of change that means it is potentially…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s beliefs on living a good life start with careful deliberation of the ends and the means. Suppose I want a laptop--the laptop is my goal, purpose, or end. I can do various things to get the laptop--such as earn, steal, borrow, or save. These things are known as my means. The means I decide to use depends on which is more convenient and which leads to the most benefits. Contemplating about the end goal that we are pursuing, and the means we use to reach that goal is practical thinking. However, this type of thinking does not come to fruition, until purposeful action occurs; which is acting with some purpose, goal, or end in mind. This purposeful action is compared differently with thoughtless action, which is an action with no purpose…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please respond to the questions in bold. All your responses to this assignment should be based on the information given on “Was Aristotle Right or Wrong?”…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle, by contrast, theorized that objects were defined by their purpose. A pizza was round because it’s designer had given it that roundness, or function. The form of the object exists within itself so all is within this world. That which the pizza was made of could have been given a different form if it had been made differently. It could have…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garber on Descartes

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The central ideas of the scholastic metaphysics stemmed from Aristotle’s Hylomorphic doctrine, a dualistic body of principles. It was believed that all things were made up of Primary Matter and Substantial Form, together resulting in a complete substance. Primary matter was thought of as a necessary component of all things, something that everything held, but not without the accompaniment of a secondary constituent, Substantial Form. When added to Primary matter, Substantial form gave each object its characteristics, essence, and intrinsic behavior. Each object in the world was thought to have it’s own substantial form, and with that it’s own intention. Descartes also describes what he calls “real quality”, that which is a necessity “by virtue of having Substantial form” (96). This concept of “real qualities” is considered to be “mentalistic” in nature; take heaviness for example, scholastics believed it had “the intention to bear the body toward a particular place” (99), rather then just being “matter in motion” as Descartes believed it to be. Thus, the “real qualities” of substantial forms “explain the characteristic behavior of bodies of various sorts” (99).…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle also undertook a more empirical analysis, emphasising that observation comes first and abstract reasoning second. Plato would argue that instances of for example beauty only exist because they partake in the universal Form of Beauty. However, Aristotle would argue that universal concepts of beauty procure from instances of beauty if this world, the physical world. He believed that we only arrive at the conclusion of beauty by observing particular instances of it, for example a sunset, or a beautiful woman. Deriving from this theory he deduced that beauty has no existence beyond the concept we build from these instances, from the sunset or the woman, and that without these exemplars beauty has no existence. This accentuates the concept of particulars coming before universals and forms, with particular insistence on observation. Due to this, Aristotle has long been…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thoughts tended to believe in two levels of reality. Plato held that metaphysics is dualistic: he proposed that there are two different kinds of things - physical and mental. There is what appears real and what is real. Plato believed that everything real takes on a form but doesn't embody that form. on the other hand, Aristotle’s beliefs lead to him seeing only one level of reality. He felt there was only one imminent world and that forms existed within particular things. Aristotle held that form had no separate existence and existed in matter. in nature, we never find matter without form or form without matter. substance is always a composition of form and matter.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democritus Research Paper

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He believed that this was not the order of the universe. He believed that this concept put too much of a limitation on the "gods" and that they possessed unlimited power. He claimed that the earth was not made of atoms and that there was no smallest part of matter. Aristotle affirmed that all of the material on Earth were composed of four elements: Earth, Water, Fire, and Air and that Democritus's views were worthless. He believed that these elements moved either up or down, fire being the lightest, and earth being the heaviest. In Addition, Aristotle added a fifth element that all heavenly bodies were contrived from. He stated that this particular element could turn economical metals into pure gold and cure disease and old age. This instituted alchemy, which was the pursuit of the fifth the element.Majority of people supported Aristotle's idea causing Democritus's idea to be overlooked for about 2,000 years Later, Aristotle's view was proven to be incorrect and his teaches are no longer present in the view of atoms today.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (4) Can you explain Aristotle’s claim that “perception produces the universal in us”? How does this explain how something indemonstrable can be known?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chemistry Gr.11

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Negatively charged electrons are distributed inside the atoms which is a positively charged sphere consisting of mostly empty space (Plum Pudding model)…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “All I know is that I know nothing” argued the deep ancient philosopher Socrates. His argument is based on the fact that one cannot know anything with absolute certainty; they could only know something with a fractional amount of confidence. Socrates had written this quote nearly two thousand year ago. With our vast advances in modern technology, science, mathematics, and equipment to record data, over the last two millenniums, one would assume that we would long grow this view of not knowing anything. However, the vaster amount of knowledge we obtain we somehow gain the unveiling of new unknown knowledge. The famous phrase answers breed more questions, suggests that we are in a never ending loop of certainty about reality. Could Socrates be right after all? Do we actually know anything about reality?…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays