Creation was a super natural event. It took place outside of the physical laws of our universe. Many discoveries in astronomy have shown beyond reasonable doubt that the universe did, in face have a beginning. No one knows how far it goes back too but there was a single moment of creation. But the still question remains how it all happened. Scientists today are deeply troubled by the questions posed by the discovery of irreducible complexity – the vast amounts of information that is encoded in every single living cell and organism. They have also come to discover thousands upon thousands of exquisitely designed machines at the molecular level. They are so much incredibly complex and alike. Many prominent modern scientists such as Paul Davies, George Greenstein and Arno Penzias are stepping forward and claiming this information requires intelligence and the design must require a designer. “It is hard to resist the impression that the present structure of the universe, apparently so sensitive to minor alterations in numbers, has been rather carefully thought out…The seemingly miraculous concurrences of these numerical values must remain the most compelling evidence for cosmic design.” (Davies, 189) Does God exist? It’s a question many have asked throughout human existence here on earth. The universe and the biological word provide overwhelming proof He exists and created it all. Many biochemists and mathematicians have calculated the odds against life coming into being from non-life naturally (or by chance). It’s impossible, the odds are astronomical. “Earths location, its size, it’s composition, its structure, its atmosphere, its temperature, its internal dynamics, and its many intricate cycles that are essential to life—the carbon cycle, the oxygen cycle, the nitrogen cycle, the phosphorus cycle, the sulfur cycle, the calcium cycle, the sodium cycle, and so on—testify to the degree to which our planet is exquisitely and precariously balanced.” (Strobel, The case for the Creator, 194) Assigning creation to random chance is like saying a tornado could travel through a trailer park and assemble a rocket ship out of the rubble efficient enough for NASA to use to travel to Mars. Astronomer Carl Sagan wrote about the human brain. He claimed the amount of information the human brain expressed by the total number of neuron connections can be compared to the equivalent of 20 million books. He also stated that the neurochemistry of the brain is astonishingly busy, the circuitry of a machine more advanced and wonderful than any devised by humans. If computers require a human designer, then it objectively makes sense the human brain would require an even more intelligent designer.“ ‘The Cambrian Explosion represents an incredible quantum leap in biological complexity,’ Meyer said. ‘Before then, life on earth was pretty simple—one-celled bacteria, blue-green algae, and later some sponges and primitive worms or mollusks. Then without any ancestors in the fossil record, we have a stunning variety of complex creatures appearing in a blink of an eye, geologically speaking.” (Strobel, The case for a Creator, 297) The beginning of the universe leads us to ask the question “Did existence come about by chance, from nothing or did someone, with a purpose in mind, create it all?” Which seems more likely, which makes more logical sense? For me the answer is obvious, and I have no question in my mind that there isn’t an intelligent creator out there. Our world and everything it consists of is way to complex and extraordinary to come about by just chance. “ In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was formless and empty, and the darkness covered the deep waters. And the spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters. Then God said, ‘Let there be light’, and there was light.” (Genesis 1-3, Holly Bible)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…
- 1677 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Stephen Hawking, one of the World’s leading scientists, released a new book in 2010 called, ‘The Grand Design.’ He and his co-author, Leonard Mlodinow, stated that, ‘you don’t need God to create the universe because the laws of gravity and a certain version of quantum physics suffice to make it inevitable that the universe will create itself, out of nothing, in an infinite variety of forms; and given an infinite variety of forms, a segment or sub-universe friendly to mankind is bound to develop, no design needed, grand or not.’ He also later on in the book writes that, ‘spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.’ Both of these quotes are strong evidence that the universe is an accidental one, and there is no such thing as a creator or a created universe.…
- 677 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Very religious people say that nobody should believe in the Big Bang. It is theory and a theory is an idea. There is no proof of the explosion that began the world. There were no eye-witnesses to the big bang, whereas the seven days of creation where received by God and written down.…
- 418 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Cosmology is the branch of study in relation to the origin and nature of the universe (Farlex, 2012). The thoughts and opinions on how the universe began over the years was one of spiritual and scientific. Through beliefs of the Bible and followers of the faith it is believed that God created the universe and everything in it. From a scientific view it is believed that the universe was created by The Big Bang. Throughout time many astronomers and scientists pushed the envelope to prove that the universe was not created by God but instead created by one force in space that over time has further developed what is on Earth and out in the universe. Most of the scientists and astronomers back in time were followers of the religion and almost had their own beliefs lead them into the wrong direction. It was not until such people as Galileo, Copernicus, and Sir Isaac Newtown that further proved The Big Bang Theory caused the creation of the universe.…
- 946 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Consistently from the dawn of human existence, the idea of “God”, or simply the questions of the place from whence the human body has come from forced any individual to consider the religious value or idea of God regarding God’s responsibility for every piece of matter in which makes up life. One of the most critical arguments that claim that there must be a God is the Kalem Cosmological argument, which uses the universe’s mere existence or the beginning of the universe’s existence to claim that whatever has a beginning, must have a cause, insinuating that the cause of the universe’s beginning is in theory, God. Though with creative intellect in further questioning it’s impossible for one not to question that the Cosmological argument may be correct in theory, but does the cause of the universe have to be God? Throughout this paper, I’ll be focusing on the argument that God’s existence does not have to be the direct cause of the begging of the universe, nor does the cosmological argument actually prove the existence of God for that matter.…
- 644 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The anthropic principle proposes that the reason and purpose for the universe is the support of human life: ‘As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents…the Universe must in some case have know we were coming’ (Freeman Dyson, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle). It also demonstrates that the design argument need not reject the principles of evolution in order to assume a designing God. However, theistic supporters of evolution argue that scientific principles alone are not enough to explain a perfectly balanced natural order that…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Moreover, when comparing different theories as the Big Bang with the creation of the earth stories from the different Native American tribes, many similarities and differences come to surface. Most of the Native American stories are based upon the believe of a higher power or a spiritual creator which originally created the world people live in. “Long, long ago, the Creator, the Great Chief Above, made the world. Then he made the animals and the birds and gave them their names.” Even though the Natives are spread out into different tribes, they all have different forms of some sort of a spiritual or magical creator, which developed the earth. The Big Bang Theory, unlike all the native American spiritual stories, is based on a proved hypothesis with concrete information and many explanations, which makes this story or theory an exact fact. “Scientists have discovered what Albert Einstein predicted…
- 654 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Comment on the view that the design argument provides a coherent explanation of the universe (9)…
- 666 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is one of the most famous of all philosophical arguments that address the existence of a supernatural being who created the material universe. The supernatural being whom created the material universe is the logical core of what is commonly meant by the word God within the classic theistic religious traditions of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity with reasoning that constitutes a philosophical argument for the existence of God. Many cosmological questions on religion have intrigued human beings across all cultures since the beginning of recorded history and continue to interest us today. The Cosmological Argument is also known as the First Cause Proof that addresses that something must require a first cause to be brought into existence. Although many philosophers and people are skeptics of this theory based on the unbelief of God existence and logically thinking that God would need a cause to existence. The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is not the strongest argument for religious groups to prove reason for the existence of God.…
- 2130 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The big bang theory cannot be reconciled with the notion of an intelligent designer. T or F…
- 505 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There is also an alternative scientific theory – The Steady State Theory. This says that the Universe is not changing, and had no beginning which makes the Big Bang nonsense – but few scientists accept this theory, and it doesn’t have any solid evidence.…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the 1920s, Einstein propelled the new science of cosmology. His equations predicted that the universe is dynamic. It is ever changing. This contradicted the popular view that the universe was static. That was the view that Einstein held earlier and was a guiding factor in his development of the general theory of relativity. In 1929, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was indeed expanding, thus confirming Einstein's work.…
- 1255 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Cosmological Argument is born out of premise that the world must have a cause and a reason for existing. The word ‘cosmos’ comes the Greek word meaning concerned with cause. The argument is posteriori in its nature, meaning it is based on thing we experience in the universe, and takes a probabilistic approach to try and decipher how said evidence came to being. In this essay I will focus on arguments from Aquinas, Leibniz and Frederick Copleston, whilst also touching upon some weaker, not so significant arguments from Kalam. These arguments attempt to prove how the Cosmological Arguments provides evidence of God.…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it. The existence of the universe, the argument claims, stands in need of explanation, and the only adequate explanation of its existence is that it was created by God.…
- 498 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Redshift is when the observed wavelength of a galaxy moving away from us, is moving towards red on a wavelength spectrum and the farther the galaxy, the greater the redshift. In short, red shift shows that a galaxy moves faster as it gets farther from us, and “Since we cannot assume that we have a special place in the Universe, this is evidence for a generally expanding Universe.” (The Big Bang 1). This suggests that everything is moving away from everything else, and expanding. Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation (CMBR) is electromagnetic radiation that was present after the Big Bang. According to the Big Bang theory, Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation is in all “observable space”, (or technically everywhere), and most radiation energy in the universe is in the background of the cosmic microwave. The Big Bang theory suggests that the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation is left over from The Big Bang, and Jerry Coffey claims that: “Once you consider it, it only makes sense that there would be a background radiation that is directly related to the expansion of the Universe”, and “is a landmark proof of the Big Bang Theory” (Coffey 1). Soon after Lemaitre created the Big Bang theory, he published a paper introducing it. Mark Egdall claims that “Two years later, Edwin Hubble— who, like most scientists, had not read Lemaître’s paper — came up with the same redshift/distance relationship using nearly the same data” (Egdall 1). This proves as evidence because it demonstrates that two people were able to find the same solution as to how the universe was created, without communicating to each…
- 804 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays