The Bill Clinton Scandal
March 12, 2013
The Bill Clinton Scandal The Constitution of the United States outlines the fundamental government and laws of the country. Its main purpose is to establish separation of powers in order to protect the people from unfair rule. A means of protecting the United States from a corrupt executive leader is outlined in the sections detailing with grounds for and actions to be taken in the case of impeachment of a civil officer of government for crimes committed while they are serving in office. Thus far, there have only been two instances of impeachment by the House of Representatives of a President (Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton). In both of these cases the Senate deemed them not guilty. Taking a closer look at the alleged wrongdoings of former president Bill Clinton, is it fair to say that he should have been removed from office? A glimpse into U.S history and the fundamental laws of on impeachment may shed a light on the answer to this question. The United State's Constitution provides a means for protecting the people. After being under British rule for so many years, the people of the U.S didn't want to be under political rule that mirrored a monarchy in any way. The basis goal of the constitution is to protect the liberty and equality of the people. The first branch of government mentioned in the document is the legislative branch (Article I). Because the legislative branch represents the people and is mentioned first, it reaffirms the importance of the service to the citizens of the U.S as number one priority. The House of Representatives is established as the body that has "the sole power of impeachment" (US Const. art. I, sec. 2, cl. 5. Print). Later, the Senate is given the power to "try all impeachments" (US Const. art. I, sec. 2, cl. 6. Print). Two thirds of the members of the Senate must be in agreement that the President is guilty in order to remove him from office. Also, according to the document, the Senate's power in
The Bill Clinton Scandal The Constitution of the United States outlines the fundamental government and laws of the country. Its main purpose is to establish separation of powers in order to protect the people from unfair rule. A means of protecting the United States from a corrupt executive leader is outlined in the sections detailing with grounds for and actions to be taken in the case of impeachment of a civil officer of government for crimes committed while they are serving in office. Thus far, there have only been two instances of impeachment by the House of Representatives of a President (Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton). In both of these cases the Senate deemed them not guilty. Taking a closer look at the alleged wrongdoings of former president Bill Clinton, is it fair to say that he should have been removed from office? A glimpse into U.S history and the fundamental laws of on impeachment may shed a light on the answer to this question. The United State's Constitution provides a means for protecting the people. After being under British rule for so many years, the people of the U.S didn't want to be under political rule that mirrored a monarchy in any way. The basis goal of the constitution is to protect the liberty and equality of the people. The first branch of government mentioned in the document is the legislative branch (Article I). Because the legislative branch represents the people and is mentioned first, it reaffirms the importance of the service to the citizens of the U.S as number one priority. The House of Representatives is established as the body that has "the sole power of impeachment" (US Const. art. I, sec. 2, cl. 5. Print). Later, the Senate is given the power to "try all impeachments" (US Const. art. I, sec. 2, cl. 6. Print). Two thirds of the members of the Senate must be in agreement that the President is guilty in order to remove him from office. Also, according to the document, the Senate's power in