Preview

The Bolshevik Initial Decrees Of The October Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Bolshevik Initial Decrees Of The October Revolution
The Bolshevik Initial Decrees were made known as soon as the Bolsheviks declared their success in the October Revolution. The Decrees appeared to conform to the popular Bolshevik slogan "Peace, Bread, and Land", taken up by the masses during the July Days (July 1917), an uprising of workers and military forces. The Decree on Peace, written by Lenin, defined measures for Russia's departure from the First World War without "payment of indemnities or annexations". This decree was directed to obtain support from many soldiers on the Russian front, which was falling apart. The sincerity of this Bolshevik assurance came under close examination when Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk which divested Russia of its Baltic territory. The Decree on Land, written by Lenin, outlined …show more content…
It supported the idea of forceful separation of many wealthy estates by peasant forces. These measures without a doubt contributed to an increase in Bolshevik support amongst the peasantry. However they were useless in the Russian war front which crumbled as soldiers (who were formerly peasants) returned to secure land for themselves. Finally, the Workers’ Decrees outlined measures for minimum wage, limitations on workers' hours, and the running of factories by elected workers' committees. This guaranteed Bolshevik support among the working classes in the cities, where they had taken power.

Lenin was successful in achieving his communist principles here, which is why his decision to write the decree on Land is positive. The Decrees on Land and Peace were distributed in little booklets across Russia and signalled that not only had a new government been proclaimed, but also that it was using power on the basis of entirely new principles. The Bolsheviks put their faith in collective farms worked on by the peasants on behalf of the people, this collectivization is a fundamentality of communism. Lenin effectively lead his party when he was able

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many consequences from the Bolshevik revolution. Farmland was distributed among farmers, and factories are given to workers. The banks were nationalized and a national council was assembled to run the economy. Russia pulled out of World War I, signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, conceding lots of land to Germany. Civil war, between Bolshevik (“red”) and anti-Bolshevik (“white”) forces, sweeps Russia from 1918 to 1920. Around 15 million die in conflict and the famine. The Russian economy is in shambles. Industrial production drops, trade all but ceases, and skilled workers flee the country. Despite the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He fuelled a period of massive industrialisation which ultimately lead to the emergence of a new social group; the urban proletariat. This group, who had little status in Russian society in the period 1854-1894, now played a major role in Russia, meaning a change in an average workers status. By 1914, there were 2.9 million workers employed in Russia working in 24,900 factories. However, this period comes with a degree of continuity in the level of status of workers; in 1910 only half of Russia’s national productivity was industrial. This points in the general direction that, as with the reigns of Alexander the II and III, the peasants were the social class with more power. The provisional government of February 1917 marked a change for the status of workers in Russia. It was formed with the Petrograd soviet, a council of workers and soldiers. They controlled the railway, postal and telegraph services; a level of status in which workers had previously never held. During Lenin’s rule, there were varying degrees of workers status: ‘While the peasantry suffered between 1918 and 1921, the urban workers became better off…The NEP clearly benefited the peasantry at the expense of urban workers’1. This quote from Lee can be challenged, as during war communism 1918 the populations of Moscow dropped by half. This shows that workers…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, with the release of the “April Theses” by Lenin, the Bolsheviks support grew. The “April Theses” pushed what Lenin thought Russia needed most at that time: ‘Peace, Bread and Land.’ This vastly appealed to masses of the lower working class of Russia; they had been exhausting this for years; the mass famine across Russia, the land controversy’s that exploited the peasant populace, which approximately made up 80% of the Russian population, and the continuation of the war, which…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin and the communist party only had a vague idea how the communist philosophy should be put into practise. This included especially the economic proposals of the communist philosophy. The first economic ideas to be put into practise were reactionary and were formulated to please the Bolsheviks (the communist party). One of these ideas was the Land Decree of 1917 which was a radical change for Russia. It abolished all private ownership without compensation and all ranks in the army. In addition, most of the economy was taken over, on the behalf of the people, by the government.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dogtown and the Z Boys

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Depending on who you ask they will give you a different answer on to what is medium is best to get a point across. There are those who feel that threw a book you would have endless possibilities to your writing that can go into dept and give specif details that you could not get in a movie or a documentary. There are those movie buffs who believe that getting your purpose out through a movie is most beneficial because you get to visual see what is trying to be represented. And in between the novelist and the movie buffs are those who feel that a documentary is the best of both world, where the director of the documentary could talk and explain to the viewer exactly the point they are trying to make and also giving the hands on and visual aspects of the art.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Limited support from the Russian population, peasants didn’t necessarily like the Bolsheviks, but they preferred them to the Whites. If the Whites won, the peasants knew the landlords would return.…

    • 307 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Provisional Government was becoming increasingly unpopular. They had failed to end the war and were blamed for food shortages and rising prices. Also, the Russian people were unable to choose their own government as the Provisional Government had not held elections which had displeased most people of Russia. The Bolsheviks took advantage of the unpopularity of the Provisional Government and increased its support. Its slogan “Bread, Land and Peace” was a really attractive offer to the Russian people. The "Bread" issue was not being solved by the government, but the Bolsheviks promised that they would deal with it. Lenin promised to provide the people with sufficient food, and the starving population turned to him for help. Furthermore, most peasants were furious with the government and the landowners for not giving the peasants a chance to earn their own money with their own land. Lenin, in accordance with the communist ideology, promised that the landowners' property would be split up and distributed equally, naturally attracting mass support from the majority of the population. In addition, the slogan ‘Peace’ was the most appealed out of the 3 by the Russian people. Almost everybody wanted the war to stop, as it continued for so long. The devastated economy and dwindling food supplies were all caused by the war, and people wished to return to their old lives. Lenin knew this and aptly used this as a slogan for his campaign. Being the only party which constantly opposed the continuation of the war, the Bolsheviks attracted many supporters.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin a Red Tsar?

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenin went on to say that based on the disproportion between economic development of the monopoly stage, which is the beginning of full socialism, and capitalism, which is the meaning of a private life and freedom from others. The only problem with that theory is that a Monopoly and Capitalism are complete opposites of each other, and were bound to cause problems. Lenin knew of this problem, but considered it a stepping stone in the right direction. He predicted problems, but thought in due time his economic machine would operate with great success, and make Russia into a world mega power. Lenin’s plan of communism for Russia was supposed to be great. People were supposed to get free education, free medical care, everybody makes the same amount of money, working equally as hard, and everybody was supposed to get the same advantage in life.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    WC was introduced predominantly to focus industrial production on supplying the Red Army during the civil war. Historian Silvana Malle describes WC as being a pragmatic response to a dire and urgent situation. Elements of WC included grain requisitioning, nationalisation of industry and banks, strict regulations on workers and the Red Terror. Peasants were forced to hand over any surplus grain to the Cheka (Secret Police). In retaliation peasants began to hide or burn their crops and slaughter their livestock in order to thwart their exploitation. Consequently, by 1921, the level of grain production throughout the country had fallen to less than half of what was produced in 1913. However, grain requisitioning was at such high levels that even though the peasants resisted it, there were still sufficient amounts of grain to supply the Red Army and the workers making munitions in factories. Under WC industry and banks were nationalised and the government took control of them. Strict regulations were placed on workers and the working day was increased to 11 hours. Lateness and absenteeism were meant with harsh punishment, such as a loss of your job. This was to ensure that priority was given to rapid production of war supplies. As result of these elements of WC, the Red Army was adequately supplied with munitions and food at all times. This meant that they were able to…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Remember, Lenin had taken land from wealthy landowners and had given the peasants their own small farms. In 1928, Stalin announced that all family farms would be abolished. They would be replaced by collective farms, or large farms worked by hundreds of families. The government expected that these collective farms, with the help of modern technology, would produce more food with fewer workers. The members of the collective farm worked the land together. They owned the machinery together. They divided what the collective farm produced according to the work each had done. The Communists liked the collective farms. The government could control the peasants better on collectives than on millions of small farms. The Communists also thought the family farms were too small and poor to use machinery. On the collective farms people were supposed to have tractors and machines. Fewer people could do more work and produce more food. This would free up people to work in the new mines and…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The driving force behind RJ is to have everyone affected by the crime (offender and victims) assemble together. The attempt is to work out the situation in a humane and benevolent manner. The discussing groups will include a facilitator, the victim(s) and the offender. Some of the major issues discussed will be forgiveness, restitution, and restoration in an attempt to heal. The type of crimes dealt with in this setting are not of a punitive nature, and there may be an opportunity to save this offender from the experience of the correctional system.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Characteristics of a Tragic Hero He must be; better than we are; a man who is superior to the average man in some way. In Oedipus case, he is superior not only because of social standing, but also because he is smart ­ he is the only person who could solve the Sphinx riddle. At the same time, a tragic hero must evoke both pity and fear, and Aristotle claims that the best way to do this is if he is imperfect. A character with a mixture of good and evil is more compelling that a character who is merely good. And Oedipus is definitely not perfect; although a clever man, he is blind to the truth and refuses to believe Teiresias warnings. Although he is a good father, he unwittingly fathered children in incest. A tragic hero suffers because of his hamartia, a Greek word that is often translated as tragic flaw; but really means error in judgment. Often this flaw or error has to do with fate ­ a character tempts fate, thinks he can change fate or doesn’t realize what fate has in store for him. In Oedipus the King, fate is an idea that surfaces again and again. The focus on fate reveals another aspect of a tragedy as outlined by Aristotle: dramatic irony. Good tragedies are filled with irony. The audience knows the outcome of the story already, but the hero does not, making his actions seem ignorant or inappropriate in the face of what is to come. Whenever a character attempts to change fate, this is ironic to an audience who knows that the tragic outcome of the story cannot be avoided.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays