The Book Thief Comparison Essay

Have you ever wondered or thought about how contrasting a movie with visuals and a novel composed of many anecdotes are? Markus Zusak’s very well-known novel ‘The Book Thief’ and Brian Percival’s digitized film “The Book Thief” hold many differences and similarities relying upon how they best depict or portray an idea that is trying to be comprehended by another. Readers of many sorts have held different views on the portrayal of films and novels just as some have for “The Book Thief.” In order for a viewer or reader to understand and take in what they’ve seen or read, they must have a true representation of the expression or situation that was shown or written. Although Brian Percival’s film bears some minor similarities and remains faithful
A narrator is permitted the duty of interacting with the novel’s characters. When a narrator as big as Death is a bit more miniscule, the big canvas for the historic moments that were being taken place in that time period are then not emphasized as much as they are needed to be. After all, The Book Thief was created and meant to accentuate the time period of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime and the resident’s struggles. Unfortunately, the role of Death was never really presented in the way that it was expressed in the novel. The first fifteen pages were used and taken to introduce Death in depth- “I deliberately seek out the colors to keep my mind off them, but now and then, I witness the ones who are left behind, crumbling among the jigsaw puzzle of realization, despair, and surprise. They have punctured hearts. They have beaten lungs (50).” “I saw the book thief three times (50).” These quotes provide a true representation of a great narrator that can help readers capture the true meaning behind a novel. Without a doubt, a great narrator can make for an iconic and brilliant novel such as Zusak’s