Preview

The Burr Conspiracy: Strengths And Weaknesses

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
The Burr conspiracy presented a lot of things in the new republic and its legal structure, both strengths and weaknesses. Andrew Burr took off on and expedition to capture New Orleans and take Mexico and turn them into his own form of government. Burrs trial obviously exposes many weaknesses within the legal structure of the United States. Burr committed an obvious act of treason against the United States government by taking it upon himself to seize territory for himself. Chief Justice Marshall found Andrew Burr to be not guilty while the jury is believed to have thought different but Burr was still let off. The legal structure and government cannot work under one mans decisions in a democracy, nor can it survive with others believing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morgan describes the problems (along with the achievements and benefits) of the Articles of Confederation very effectively. He discusses how the problems were recognized and how the framers set out to discuss and revise the articles, eventually leading up to the creation of a completely new federal Constitution which formed the basis of a new national government.…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolution brought along much change in the now United States. Post war changes occurred in the republic, this included politics. One important event was that of the Constitutional Convention in which men formulated and revised state constitutions and also developed the method by which frames of government were written and approved. The status of women was being defined and the idea of abolition rose in the North. The central government’s power of the nation was too low. Unity and power lacked in the Confederation. National debt, trade, and protection against the Spanish and Brits were several of the problems facing the Confederation. Economic troubles also gloomed over the new developing country. A major issue dealt with paper currency and how quickly inflation had occurred. Shays Rebellion was an issues in which state governments would not come to the aid of debtors in New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and South Carolina. During the reformation of the constitution, the question was whether to amend the Articles of Confederation or to write a completely new one. The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two that were proposed. Conflict ensued between the states until the Great Compromise came to and established a bicameral congress which included the House of Representatives and the Senate. Men who fought against this new constitution were known as anti-federalists. But in the end the Federalists prevailed and the ratification of the Constitution…

    • 252 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson, with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office, he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall, who was secretary of state of the time, failed to deliver seventeen commissions, one of which belonged to William Marbury. James Madison, Marshall’s successor, failed to deliver the rest of the appointments at the request of Thomas Jefferson.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boss

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. What were the primary achievements and failures of the US under the Articles of Confederation? What essentially motivated the drive to create a new foundation for government, and how did the constitution reflect the Founder’s central intensions?…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. Thomas Jefferson a) Born: April 13 th , 1743 Goochland, VA b) Died: July 4 th , 1826, Monticello,…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The outcome was tragic. Burr shot Hamilton a horrific blow which left Hamilton bed-ridden and to die the next day. Of course the federalists were enraged, and in the end Hamilton was charged of murder in New York and New Jersey. The very thing that he thought would reestablish his place in society threw him into an endless pit which would ensure that he would never climb up to political office again. He was the first duelist to be charged with murder and people lost respect for him finding him a bloodthirsty and revengeful man. In a failed attempt, he joined cahoots with General Wilkinson to make a separatist plot in the West. Soon he was forced into exile in England because he was charged with treason against the U.S. Though Hamilton was dead, his ideas remained alive. His idea for checks and balances which was initially repudiated became embraced. First it was considered an overzealous idea to encourage an overly strong government…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The conspiracy without a doubt did occur. The blacks were aware that they were slaves and spoke on challenging slavery. The intention to overthrow the current system in place was a there in New York City in 1941. It is shown in the actions of those who did rebel and confess to doing so. Davis infers that, “the intentions are often difficult things to establish in fact.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kennedy Conspiracies

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Single Shooter Theory- The single shooter theory is the theory where there was only one shooter, Lee Harvey Oswald. In this theory it was said that Oswald fired three shots from the 6th floor of the School Book Depository Building where there was later found three shell casings matching Oswald's rifle. The first shot was a miss. The second shot was infamous magic bullet shot, where the bullet hit Kennedy in the back, then went through his neck, then hits John Connelly in the back, ribs, wrist, and finally lodges in his leg. The third bullet was the head shot where Kennedy was finally killed.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aaron Burr’s image was greatly distorted after his assassination of Alexander Hamilton. This labeled as a murder to the public eye. The way a leader is perceived can either create or break their public life. Since Hamilton was very well known and beloved to the early Americans, it caused an uproar the entire nation. Therefore, with this enormous blow to his career, it was no longer seen as a leader that could be trusted. In the matter of leading, trust is the simple yet crucial building block to becoming an just and influential…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aaron Burr a important person because he helped our country by being a excellent vice president. But he said Alexander Hamilton was challenging by mounting public attacks. Then Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton. Burr the following year had been planning to recoup west,but some power in the east denied him the power to do that. Precise motive was found out.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aaron Burr is a notable case in America’s judicial history. One such reason is, as The American Pageant claims on page 215, “Burr’s insurrectionary brashness demonstrated that it was one thing for the United States to purchase large expanses of western territory but quite another for it to govern them effectively.” Plainly stated, this means that the United States could acquire as much land as they pleased, but actually ruling it was an entirely different matter. If Burr’s numerous insurrectional schemes had actually succeeded, the results could have been potentially catastrophic for the relatively new nation. Burr, however, never came to regret his actions. Upon hearing about the revolution in Texas four years later, Burr proclaimed to a friend “There! You see? I was right! I was only thirty years too soon. What was treason in me thirty years ago, is patriotism…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strongly opposed the purchase, favoring close relations with Britain over closer lies to Napoleon, and were concerned that the US had paid a large sum of money just to declare war on Spain…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays