Preview

The Case Of Mr. Simpson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Case Of Mr. Simpson
This is a murder case that faced Mr. Simpson who is a former football star and an actor. He was tried following the murder of his ex-wife, N.Brown Simpson, and a waiter R. Goldman. It is believe that Simpson’s ex-wife Brown, and Goldman were found murdered outside her home and this made Simpson to be a key suspect. He was later acquitted after the trial that had lasted for months.The trial was complicated and it had taken long since Mr. Simpson had hired a high profile defense team and this led to a heated parley during the trial. (Graham 23) One of the major competing debates that rose during the trial concerning the case was the DNA evidence. The defense team led by Cochran was able to convince the jurors about the reasonable uncertainty …show more content…
Simpson claimed that he was asleep at the time of claim. According to his lawyer Johnnie Cochran, Simpson never left his house and he was alone in the house packing in preparation for the trip to Chicago. In opposition to Kaelin’s claims, Johnnie claimed that Simpson went outside through the back exit to hit golf balls and he went ahead to insist that it’s some of these few balls that made three loud thumps on Kaelin’s bungalow wall. He went ahead and produced a witness who confessed that she had seen Simpson’s car parked outside the house at the time the murders were taking place. This was contradicting Parks claim that the Bronco was nowhere to be seen near the house. After a close cross-examination of the witness’s testimonies, prosecutor Clark declined to present them to the jury (Hastie 197). The witness was forced to accept her uncertainty of the precise time she saw Simpson’s Bronco outside the …show more content…
The defense argued that this was done maliciously by the police. They claimed that the police planted false evidence and pinned it on O.J. Simpson out of racism and hate. They also argued that the evidence was not collected from the scene and it had been tampered with. According to DNA analysis, the blood found on socks of Simpson identified to be Nicole’s. In addition to this, the blood found near the Simpsons Bronco showed traces of Simpson’s, Nicole’s and Ronald’s blood. According to the defense, medical expert Dr. Henry Lee testified that the only way such blood would appear was if Simpson had an injury on the ankle or the blood was placed on the socks while it was not used, showing that this was planted evidence. Dr. Henry also testified that the procedure of collection caused contamination and this made the evidence collected by Los Angeles Police Department criminalist Dennis to be highly criticized. Dennis also admitted that he had not used rubber gloves when collecting some of the evidence. Another LAPD detective Mr. Vannatter testified that he saw photographs of person thought to be a press man leaning on Simpsons Bronco before the collection of the evidence(Williams

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Appellant admitted that he was standing in front of Keeling’s truck with items identified by a victim. RR 4:99-100 Because the analysis does not require that the evidence be “sufficient, standing alone, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense,” we conclude that Appellant did not suffer egregious harm from the omission of the accomplice-witness instruction. Ambrose, 487 S.W.3d at…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The allegations were contradicted by other people within the trial. The jury saw that there was not enough evidence supporting that it was a clear print mistake, and that it instead was a act of malice.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this unending circumstance of the former football player Orenthal James Simpson accused of killing his ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman in 1994. The investigators reigned the knife out after weeks of forensic testing. The authorities determined that there is no link to the murder. However, one of the reason police had presented proof of knife last month. They had learned that the knife had been in the proprietorship of a retired L.A. cop for more than twelve years. The officer acknowledged it from the construction worker who told him that he found the knife while working with a crew tearing down Simpson’s Brentwood estate. Simpson was above suspicion of stabbing to death, his ex-wife and Goldman in 1994 outside her condominium.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Steven Vail Case

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Avery's lawyers argue that this vial was used to plant the blood in Halbach's car in the 2007 case. Police claimed that they found a key to Halbach's SUV in Avery's home. But the key was only found after multiple searches, and contained only Avery's DNA, not Halbach's even though Halbach would have used the key for years. Avery's defense also argues that the key was planted and raising questions. Law enforcement officials also said that they found a bullet with Halbach's DNA on it in Avery's garage, arguing that its evidence that Avery shot and killed Halbach in there. But, if that is possible, why couldn't police find any other sign of Halbach's DNA in there. Tests found no signs of EDTA, an anticoagulant used to preserve the blood in Avery's vial, in the blood found in Halbach's SUV. The prosecution used this finding as proof that the blood found in Halbach's SUV was not the same as the blood found in Avery's vial. But a forensic expert testified for the defense that the test for EDTA is so faulty that a finding of no EDTA could also mean the test wasn't good enough. But, the prosecution was built mainly on the testimony of Brendan Dassey, Avery's nephew. Supposedly he idallegedly helped Avery kill Halbach. The prosecution announced Dassey's supposed confession in a big press…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The O. J. Simpson robbery case (officially called the State of Nevada v. Orenthal James Simpson, et al.) was a criminal case prosecuted in 2007-2008 in the U.S. state of Nevada, primarily involving the retired American football player O. J. Simpson.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module two lab questions

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic evidence has been used since the beginning of investigating. It could be anything from ammunition, to a handprint on the door, to the drops of blood on the crime scene. As seen in “Forensic Evidence” by Andrea Campbell, the indisputable forensic evidence is the best kind to use in a trial.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the OJ Simpson case, there was a lot of trace evidence. Some of it led to suspicion that OJ killed his ex-wife and her friend. There were four blood drops from the Bronco console and one drop from the glove found at the…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A jury trial was held in which the jury considered both the guilt and innocence of Mrs. Clark; and the circumstances of the commission of the murder.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ESPN documentary series, they talked mostly about the planting of the glove by Mark Fuhrman, rather than how all of the crime scenes were handled. The ESPN documentary does not cover how evidence was missing, tampered with, or completely ignored. The lack of information about the evidence in the ESPN documentary, causes speculation for…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is one of the most famous cases of all time. It was nationally televised and seen by millions and millions of people. The main suspect in this trial was O.J Simpson who is a retired football star. He was accused of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her “friend” Ron Goldman. This case was highly controversial and many people believe that O.J did murder both of them even though he was found not-guilty. This case had a lot of evidence including forms of forensic evidence.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "PROVING THE CASE: DNA EVIDENCE IN THE OJ SIMPSON CASE." PROVING THE CASE: DNA EVIDENCE IN THE OJ SIMPSON CASE. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Mar. 2014.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first point is that there was a knife found in Simpson’s home. It was purchased by Simpson before the murder occurred. The coroner says that the wounds on the two corpses indicated that the knife was a single edged knife, which matches the knife recently purchased aby Simpson. The doctor who looked the knife over says that he cannot be certain of the knife being the murder weapon, yet the murder weapon has never been found. In addition to this, when Simpson learns of the knife being found in his home, he was quoted as being “a bit nervous” of the knife that had been discovered. Why be nervous if it wasn’t used? The doctors never gave a definite answer on how the knife wasn’t used. They said they can’t be certain. The police posted that the knife wasn’t used, yet they never explained how it was proven to be clean. They simply said it wasn’t the weapon and went about their business. This is obviously reason to believe that the knife is the weapon used in the murder. The doctors aren’t positive, the police aren’t descriptive, and Simpson is “a bit nervous” of a knife found on his…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opening statements the defense and the prosecution has the opportunity to present their case to the jury. Throughout the opening statements persuasive arguments are announced. During the opening statement evidence is never allowed. Judge Lance A. Ito presided over the case and on January 24, 1995. Before things got going, Judge Ito ruled that Simpson would not be heard by the jury until the defense gives the opening statements. The defense opening statements were lead by attorney Johnnie Cochran when said my client Mr. Simpson is innocent and wrongfully accused.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scott Peterson Case

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There was a good amount of evidence used in the Scott Peterson trial by the prosecution but all of it was circumstantial with not one piece of hard evidence. Five key items of evidence that the prosecution used to sway the jury in convicting Scott Peterson were the defenses major blunder from Dr. Charles March, the missing cement, the affair with Amber Frey, the two tarps used on the fishing trip, and finally the ultimate break down of Petersons fishing alibi. The first key item of evidence and the straw that broke the camels back was the complete break down of the defenses key witness Dr. Charles March. Dr. March was brought to the trail as the defenses…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays