The Chosen is a phenomenal book so far. In this novel, I can really appreciate Chaim Potok’s creative mind. I find it so interesting how hate can turn to friendship. I also find it interesting that two Jews living in the same area can hate each other. How do two young men who come from similar backgrounds…hate each other? The author does a wonderful job of explaining how they do not believe in exactly the same things, but indeed are similar. Danny’s family is more “traditional” while Reuven’s family is more “modern”, but both are Jews living in a relatively tense time.…
In the novel, The Chosen, written by Chaim Potok, the reader learns about some important events in Danny Saunders and Reuven Malter's friendship. One of the most important situations is where Reuven gets hit in his eye with a baseball which Danny has thrown. Another important aspect of their friendship is where Reb Saunders accepts his son's friendship with Reuven. Another significant event is Reb Saunders explaining why he raises Danny in silence. Finally, the last event is when the Saunder's family tells Reuven he is not allowed to have anything to do with the Saunders' family.…
Chaim Potok in his novel, The Chosen, uses parallels between characters to compliment one another by sharing knowledge and contrasting one another. There are two particular characters that are especially prominent. Reuven and Danny are both raised as American Jews and are the same age, at times they build and learn off of one another as they grow up together. Danny’s photographic memory makes memorizing things easy, but at times he struggles with other subjects. Potok writes, “Two blatt?…
The Chosen is a novel written by Chaim Potok that centers around two Jewish teens growing up in Brooklyn, New York in the 1940s, and their struggle to reach adulthood and determine what their personal beliefs and goals are. Through a conflict revolving around the relationship between a father and son, supporting details about the life and beliefs of members of the Jewish community during the 1940s, and by describing the growth of a character through the eyes of his best friend, the author illustrates the importance of relying on loved ones during hard times.…
Chaim Potok grew up in a Jewish family. Since Potok knew the Jewish culture so well, he was able to translate his knowledge into the book. Potok based the character of Danny off of himself. From Potok’s writing style, readers relate to the characters, feeling their emotion, whether happy or sad. It seems as if Reuven and Danny are telling readers their story. Readers also learn what it was like for the Jews during WWII and to discover the Holocaust happened. By the end of the…
In The Chosen, Potok describes the Jewish culture during the period of World War I. Beginning with the affluence of Polish Jews before the war, Potok established a circle of relationships. In the book, there are three main relationships. The first one is father-son, between Danny and his father, Reb Saunders and between Reuven and his father, David Malter. The relationship between Reuven and Danny is the second main relationship in The Chosen. The third main relationship is Hasidism verses Zionism.…
Both are referred to as brilliant, and David even refers to Danny as “a phenomenon. A Once in a generation mind” (Potok 106). Moreover, both boys are the son of a respected voice in their corresponding communities and are seemingly representations of their father’s ideologies. Reuven, in combination with his father, represents the less strict Orthodox Jews who are willing to adapt and accept modern ideals into their religion and fully integrate into modern society. On the other hand, Danny and his father, display a Hasidic, traditional perspective of Jewish life that remains separate from modern society. It must also be noted that neither boy chose their faith, rather it was chosen for them by virtue of birth. But, the friendship formed between Danny and Reuven will prove to be a bridge connecting tradition to…
The way Potok sets up My Name is Asher Lev is to make the two worlds of Judaism and Secularism conflict. He does this with the use of many key icons and symbols of the two ways of life. He employs extreme Jewish symbols and symbol-systems, such as Hasidism, the Rebbe, Asher's father, Gemarah, Shabbos, and very symbolic holidays like Rosh Hashanah and Pesach, to portray a barrier between Asher, his community, and the rest of the world. He then uses extreme secular symbols such as, Russia, art, and in art, crusifixions, nudes, and Asher's art mentor Jacob Kahn, to show the radical differences between the two. At one point (in book 3, chapter 10) Jacob says to Asher, "You are too religious to be an Abstract Expressionist..." ... "We are ill at ease in the universe. We are rebellious and individualistic. We welcome accidents in painting. You are emotional and sensual but you are also rational. That is your Landover background...." Potok makes Hasidim out to be a dying culture by telling stories about them in the past, and a big part of Asher's consciousness of his heritage, and his dreams and perceptions of his Grandfather (chapter 3, pg. 98). "He came to me that night out of the woods, my mythic ancestor, huge, mountainous, dressed in his dark caftan and fur-trimmed cap, pounding his way…
This is faced mainly by Tom, who is facing a life threatening disease, Leukaemia. Tom throughout the novel acts as a catalyst for change, helping characters find who they are but also travels on an inner journey himself. Toms own physical journey is towards a fast approaching death which is shown through dialogue between Tom and Meg when he says, “I was told the infection was running its course”. But his acceptance of his fate enables others to be healed. This journey is shown when Tom’s doctor has given the short time period in which he has to live, prompting and encouraging Tom to have sex before he dies. His immaturity and teenager lifestyle is shown when he and Meg are on the beach and Tome tries to seduce Meg into having sex with him. Tom constantly uses repetition of his dying status to make people feel sorry for him. This is shown when Tom says,” So how about it? Help me. I’m going to get sick again. And I won’t get better. Your parents won’t find out”. Through the use of syntax, Gow emphasises to the audience how it is Toms Last chance and the great significance and importance this would have on Tom. Meg reluctantly refuses. This then prompted Tom as he learned to accept his illness he also learnt that family time is far more important than sex. He turned to listening to people such as Coral. Tom being the catalyst for change not only helped to change Corals and other…
To illustrate the progression of time, Bell writes the novel as a third person narrative that changes main character on four different occasions. All main characters are part of the same family, giving interpretations of the struggles they face over three different generations. The transition of main characters was always a result of a death. Whether that be in part one when the main character, George Kracha‘s wife dies after a long spin of illness, which can be gathered was a result of heart ache. Or when the actual main character dies like Mike Dobrejcak in a work related accident at the mill, and Mary Dobrejcak-Kracha after being hospitalized from consumption and later dyeing from the flu. Bell portrays a quite grim depiction of the fatality rate during the second industrial revolution. There is an emphasis on the struggles the working class had to go through just in order to stay alive.…
Almost to hard to figure out completely, he seems to barely talk and not talk to his son but he also seems to care a lot. In everything Reb Saunders does he does to teach the Talmud or help people to better understand it. He lives his life very seriously and rarely smiles. But everything that Reb Saunders does he has a reason for, "My father himself never talked to me, except when we studied together. He taught me with silence. He taught me to look into myself, to find my own strength, to walk around inside myself in company with my soul.” Red Saunders says as explaining why he does not talk to Danny very often. He knows what he does and he knows why and he would not change for anyone…
It is possible that the plague is merely exacerbating tensions already present with in the village but it does so to an unprecedented degree. Thus, certain individuals of a somewhat antisocial and self-serving bent find their actions and inclinations magnified by the advent of the Plague. Josiah Bont, who is Anna’s abusive father, becomes a gravedigger, willing to pursue homicide as a stimulus to his profits; his wife, Aphra, shamelessly exploits the anxieties of her fellow villagers for monetary gain by pretending to be the ghost of the deceased Anys Gowdie. In what is, perhaps, a less culpable fashion, David Burton seizes the opportunity to advance his own interest at the expense of Merry Wickord, whose family mine has been left open to claim by the death of her parents. Instances such as these suggest that Michael Mompellion’s assertion that “the Plague will make heroes of us all”, however optimistic, is not well founded. Even more strikingly, the readiness of the villagers to turn against Mem and Anys Gowdie, whose service as healers have been much in demand, indicates that the plague deepens the rifts already exists in the community. As Jon Millstone comments, there is a grave danger that the time “will make monsters of us all”. Therefore it is the villagers own nature which acts as the catalyst for further tragic…
Things which once had been rare to him, such as the death of patients, were now commonplace. The juxtaposition of Rieux’s calm life before the plague, to his dreary and torturous life afterwards emphasises the dramatic changes in Rieux’s mental state as hopelessness and monotony enveloped and ate his old happy lifestyle. When Rieux’s closest partner, Tarrous, was taken by the plague Rieux’s heart was forever shattered by the plague as he watch the life escape out of him like the many other people he had watched before. The plague causes Rieux to see things no…
"..the husband durable, receptive, gentle; the child a tender golden three. The sight of them made her so sad and sick she did not want to see them ever again."(38) This reveals to the readers that the woman is resentful of her husband's strong health and her child's young age thus, begrudges them as her own life is depreciating. This is a good example of the woman's characterization because it describes her physical appearance and thoughts, as it also give the reader a glimpse of the overall tone to the story.…
letter *A* embroidered on her chest. The A served as a symbol of her crime, was…