Preview

The Civil War: the Confederate-Southern Perspective

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1848 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Civil War: the Confederate-Southern Perspective
The Civil War: The Confederate-Southern Perspective

We are often taught in grade school the Union (or Northern view) of the Civil War because that is who won the war. In retrospect, both sides should be taught in American history, since, after all, this was a war with ourselves over differences. How different the nation would be if the South had won. Would we still engage in slavery? Would the United States have a completely different moral and ethical code in business? What of the impact of religion? Politically, how would our nation then be ran? These are just a few of the questions raised as I began my journey in search of Confederate ideals and Southern reasons for the war. In every story, there are three sides. With the Civil War, there is the Northern side, the Southern side and then there is the truth. While not all truths may be discovered, my purpose here to is to understand the defenses in which the Confederates believed they were fighting for. Business, politics, slavery and abolition, differences between Northerners and Southerners beliefs and values are all pieces to the puzzle that eventually led to the war. The Confederacy believed they had the right to secede were based on grounds that the United States Union no longer politically supported nor represented them as a people. According to the Declaration of Independence in the opening statement: “When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume…the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s god entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation”…“that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government”. The South strongly believed their livelihoods were at stake, and



Bibliography: Bevin Alexander. How The South Could Have Won the Civil War: the fatal errors that led to Confederate defeat. New York: Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., 2007. Richard E. Beringer, Herman Hattaway, Archer Jones and William N. Still, Jr. Why the South Lost the Civil War. Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1986. Kenneth M. Stamp. The Causes of the Civil War. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1991. William J. Cooper, Jr. Jefferson Davis, American. New York: Vintage Books, a division of Random House, Inc., 2000. http://www.civilwarhome.com/confederatecause.htm http://www.americancivilwar.com/documents/confederate_constitution.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    5. Keith D. Dickson. The Civil War for Dummies. (Wiley Publishing Inc. 2001), 158 – 159.…

    • 4616 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The propaganda pitch the Union gave was they were fighting to free the slaves. This was not true! It was said Southerners were fighting to preserve slavery. This is also a false statement. Roughly less than 6% of all Southerners owned slaves. In fact, there were a substantial amount of generals in the Union army that owned slaves themselves. In addition the constitution protected slavery. If the true issue was to maintain slavery the South would not have seceded. The most obvious myth is that the "good" North marched into the "cruel and evil" South for the sole purpose of freeing the slaves. There are many quotes from Northern leaders that show clearly that the main purpose of the North was not the eradication of slavery, but subjugation of the southern people. Slavery was used to rally the Northern population behind Abraham Lincoln's war. It was an emotional issue, sure some Yankees joined and fought to "set men free", but most were there to preserve the union. Preserving the Union meant stepping on the Southern people and keeping them as a tax base to feed Northern industrialists. An interesting conflict of Northern morals is discovered. The North…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South Since 1865 delivers an entertaining account and perspective on the drastic changes in the South. This book is an excellent resource to students, educators and history enthusiasts. In reviewing the book, the principal criteria included content, organization, and reference sources. While editing errors and organizational incongruities plague some of the latter chapters, these are only minor distractions to the story being told.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina took the brunt of the Total War philosophy, “Destroyed it was, through a corridor from south to north narrower than in Georgia but more intensely pillaged and burned” (McPherson 826).…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are constant debates on why did the South lose the Civil War. The Civil War ended 150 years ago but that has not affected historians to question the outcome of the war for the Confederacy. According to Gary Gallagher, many historians work backward starting from Appomattox to explain the failure of the war. He continues by stating that those historians claim the reasoning for the failure was caused by the lack will to win the war by the Confederates. Gary Gallagher disagrees with these methods historians use. Gary Gallagher believes that the best way to understand why the Confederates lost the Civil War takes a different approach. This is Gary W. Gallagher’s thesis in his The Confederate War is “Why did so many Confederates fight for so long? Until this question receives the detailed attention long accorded the first, the history of the Confederacy will remain imperfectly understood” (17).…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the birth of The United States, we have shown resilience and determination, starting with the Revolutionary war. As years passed and national division became evident there was discussion on who would win the fight between the free and enslaved states. Over time it has become apparent that the colonies and the confederacy have shared many qualities, which makes one wonder how is it that the colonies won, but the confederacy did not? The reason the South didn’t win the Civil War was because they were outgunned, out supplied, received no international aid and this time, their enemy wasn’t an ocean away.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    his 14

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Evaluate this statement: "The South did not lose the Civil War; the North won the conflict." Your answer should discuss the different war strategies of the two sides, the political and military leadership of North and South, and ways in which both sides conducted the war from 1863 to 1865. It should also discuss political, social, and economic homefront issues that may have influenced the outcome of the war.…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    why the war came

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the TerritorieLincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era: David Herbert ...…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Civil War was a challenging time for the American people. Numerous factors led the Southern states to secede from the United States and form the Confederate States of America. More than a century after Robert E. Lee surrendered his soldiers to the Union, people continue to argue about how the Confederacy was defeated. In the past thirty years, historians have examined the most popular believed explanations for Southern demise (Beringer). Of course, there is no established belief to why the Confederacy lost, but by studying previous wars, these historians have speculated the most rational reasons behind the CSA’s defeat.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I will discuss four points concerning the civil war in detail. The first issue discussed will be Professor McPherson's arguments in the text Ordeal by Fire and whether Antietam and Emancipation, Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Chattanooga, represent the three critical turning points in the Civil War. Second, I will rank the three points from greatest to least in terms of their importance on the Civil War. Third, I will add a fourth event I feel was significant to the turning of the war.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both sides believed that they were tasked with the protection of the ideals championed by the founding fathers that they so revered, and both claimed that they were fighting for the exact same principles. The Confederates believed that they were struggling to free themselves from the control of the bloated and ineffective Union government, while the Union believed that they were fighting to keep their country a stable and united front. The south justified their rebellion against the “tyrannical” Union by comparing it to America’s endeavor for independence from England, looking to their predecessors for strength and inspiration. They also believed that their loss would result in the subjugation of the south, and the destruction of all the institutions they held dear, such as slavery and aggressive white supremacy. In their eyes, the Union was trying to force racial integration and equality, and they decided that they would rather die than ever live in a world where black and white people are seen as…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays