(3) The Kansas – Nebraska Act was a piece of legislation and Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois was their spokesperson, this was partly because he supported the construction of a transcontinental railroad which linked Chicago to California. (4) But, for this act to be effective it was necessary to repeal the Missouri Compromise. As well as the boundary restrictions on the territorial extension of slavery that was in place with the Missouri Compromise. This act wasn’t effective and because it was ineffective. This act did not lead to the peaceful settlement of issues that it was intended to. There was violence in Kansas because the antislavery and proslavery proponents disagreed and they were violent in their disagreements. And it undermined the effectiveness of this sovereignty doctrine. Two opposing acts of government was established during this time and the violence and destruction still occurred. There was even an attack on the town of Lawrence which was an antislavery town. John Brown who was an abolitionist as well as his followers ended up killing five settlers who advocated slavery. This is where the phrase Bleeding Kansas derived from. The war in Kansas took almost two hundred lives. So I would have to believe that this act was ineffective.
Works Cited
1. www.vectorsite.com, 1.4 The Compromise Of 1850
2. www.americanhistoryabout.com
3. Henretta, Brody, Dumenil, America’s History, 2008
4. www.encyclopedia.com Kansas-Nebraska Act
Cited: 1. www.vectorsite.com, 1.4 The Compromise Of 1850 2. www.americanhistoryabout.com 3. Henretta, Brody, Dumenil, America’s History, 2008 4. www.encyclopedia.com Kansas-Nebraska Act
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
6. The Compromise of 1850 called for California to enter the Union as a free state, had the people in New Mexico and Utah decide if they wanted slavery in their state, had the slave trade abolished in Washington D.C., and passed the Fugitive Slave Act.…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Compromise * Missouri Compromise (1820) -It didn’t allow slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except Missouri. Allowed Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. * Compromise of 1850 ( 1850) - Admit California as a free state; uphold popular sovereignty in New Mexico and Utah; Includes Fugitive Slave Act; Settles Texas/New Mexico border disputes; Ban slave trade in Washington D.C * Kansas Nebraska Act (1854) - Divide the Kansas territory into Kansas and Nebraska. Have popular sovereignty decide whether they are slave states or free states * Indian Removal Acts (1830) - forced many Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi. 1838 Us army moves 15 thousand Native Americans (Cherokees). *…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The South was angry because this would upset the free/slave state balance 25. What were the terms of the Compromise of 1850? This determined the status of the land from the Mexican Cession, including California 26. How did the Compromise of 1850 benefit the North?…
- 1976 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
t the time when the United States was a new nation, there were a number of issues that needed to be addressed in order for the Union of states to become a working country. In a short period, the North had become more progressive and industrialized. There were larger urban populations and the issues that faced northern areas were different from those that faced the South. When new territories were added to the nation, it was politically relevant that they were added in such a way that the balance of power was maintained. The Compromise of 1850 addressed this balance. The Compromise was a group of five laws that addressed slavery and overturned the Missouri Compromise. The climate of the time quickly becomes one of the northern states against…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Compromise of 1850 Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky helped the crisis of 1819 through 1820 by proposing compromises. He also had a plan to help the nation maintain peace , his ideas were very important and designed to give both sides that they wanted. His ideas were: 1.California would enter the Union as a free state. 2.The rest of the Mexican Cession would be federal land. In this territory, popular sovereignty would decide on slavery.…
- 232 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Murder. The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. What could posses a person to do such a heinous crime when they have almost everything going for them? Almost does not count in the presidential elections. This was especially true with the Compromise of 1850. Two large faces in America at the time, John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster, had opposing views on what would be the ideal decision for the better good. The Compromise of 1850 included five bills passed to keep power balanced between slave and non-slave states following America's investment in new territory after the Mexican-American War.1 During the 1850s there were influential speeches spoken by both Calhoun and Webster, could the difference and need of power have led to Calhoun's death?…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Kansas-Nebraska Act created two new states, but they were voted upon using popular sovereignty. Rather than having them be free state and slave state by the Missouri Compromise, it was decided that the citizens would vote on it. This was known as popular sovereignty (voting on whether or not the state would be free or slave state), and people from the north and south came up to…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…
- 471 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Despised the compromise of 1850 Abolitionism grew in the North Northerners formed vigilante committees to protect runaways Ex-slave Fredrick Douglas published The North Star Underground railroad was a nature of safe houses to help slaves escape to freedom Grimke sisters revealed some southerners opposed…
- 45 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
When the Mexican War ended, America was ceded western territories. This caused a problem on whether these new territories would be admitted as slave states or free states. To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850 which basically made California free and allowed the people to pick in Utah and New Mexico. The ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery or not was called popular sovereignty.…
- 537 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…
- 1227 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
As part of the compromise of 1850, the Fugitive slave act was passed (The North to return runaway slaves to the south); in response the north established personal freedom laws. Essentially the North gets more from the compromise of 1850, and by not complying with the Fugitive slave law made it even more of a Northern victory. Northerners saw laws that endorse slavery as contrary to Gods law and therefore invalid, this unfairness in the Union caused a split to occur, a split that may not be mended. The election of a new president would finish the split between the North and South and lead to a…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There were a few issues at hand during this time in 1850 that brought on the whole compromise. First off, the U.S. had…
- 731 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to stave off sectional strife. Its goal was to deal with the spread of slavery to territories in order to keep northern and southern interests in balance.…
- 4780 Words
- 20 Pages
Good Essays