Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The constitution 1850-1861

Good Essays
495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The constitution 1850-1861
There were many causes for the separation of the union. Many people argue that the Constitution, which was a symbol of the national unity, contributed to its division. This is true in some ways, but it did not happen immediately. Many events, such as the passing of the Fugitive Slave and Kentucky-Nebraska Acts, gradually built up the tension between North and South, until the union collapsed. Even though the Compromise of 1850 was meant to solve the crisis, it only created more tension between the north and south.
The main purposes of the compromise were to admit California into the union as a free state, and divide the Mexican Cession into two territories - Utah and New Mexico. The slavery issue in these states was do be decided by popular sovereignty. The compromise also proved for a Fugitive Slave Law, and banned the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The Fugitive Slave Law, which was part of the compromise, also caused a lot of controversy. The main purpose of the law was to allow the capture and return of slaves that escaped into the northern states back to their original owners. Special commissioners were authorized to arrest the escapees. Even if the captured person was a free black, they were still denied the right of a fair trial. Anyone who opposed the arrest of a slave was to be punished. The Southerners were not entirely favorable to the law, because they were forced to loose California. The North also reacted negatively to the enforcement of the new law. Many people like Ralph Waldo Emerson said that the Fugitive Slave Law was in a way contradictory to the Constitution itself. He said that it is considered a crime to enslave a man in Africa, while it is also "high crime and misdemeanor, punishable with fine and imprisonment, to resist the reenslaving a man on the coast of America" (Emerson). Another example of this would be the President James Buchanan's fourth annual message to congress. Buchanan did not want the southern states to secede.
However he did not want to use armed forces to stop them either. Buchanan argued that the Congress had no power to stop a state from withdrawing from the union. He said "that no such power has been delegated to congress" (Buchanan). The Kansas-Nebraska bill was another good example. The bill proposed that the Nebraska territory was to be divided into Kansas and Nebraska territories. The settlers would then decide whether slavery should be allowed.
Southern slave owners favored this bill because it removed the boundaries set by the Missouri Compromise. The southerners were in a way "forcing slavery down the throat of the freesoliers" in Kansas. The law outraged northern Democrats, and this created even more tension. Though not the only reason, disputes over the meaning of the Constitution played a big role leading up to the Civil War. What was once established to unite the nation now lead to its separation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the early nineteenth century the United States began to split, but as mid-century came around, people became more polarized in their views and the union started to separate drastically. During the period of 1850, until 1861 when the Confederate States of America was formed, the union was clearly divided between the North and South. Although the Constitution was not the only factor leading to sectional tension in America, there are many strong points in the North and South favoring the statement, “By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created.”…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other main reasons are the control of the government, economy, states' rights, abolitionism, and the election of 1860. Although the focus revolved around slavery a lot of the tension that led to the war was from how the South felt it had no power when it came to making decisions. “As new states were added to the Union, a series of compromises were arrived at to maintain an equal number of “free” and “slave” states” (Hickman 1). However; as new states were added they were all being declared “free” states without the South having any say in the matter. Fearing they were losing power the South turned to the states' rights argument, stating that the federal government didn't have the right to change the laws of slavery in states whom already own slaves (Ayers). Things grew worse during the abolitionist movements which called for an end for slavery, whether it be immediate or gradual. This caused many disputes among the people which often led to biblical disputes (Hickman1). Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin should the cruelty of the Fugitive Slave Act and gave support to the abolitionist movement. The election of 1860 was the final straw. With the election of Abraham Lincoln as president, they feared all was about to change. “The North with its growing population and increased electoral power had achieved what the South had always feared: complete control of the government by the free states”(Hickman 2). After the election the South immediately began to discuss seceding from the Union. The secession of the South was the ultimate leading factor for the North to go to war, in order to keep the country united…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decade of Crisis 1850

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    2. The Compromise of 1850 was a response to the issues with slavery and the proposed succession of many southern states. Henry Clay was the head of this compromise and believed it had to resolve all the issues or the compromise would not survive. So in an effort to do this, he combined all the proposals into one proposal and sent it to the legislature. It covered, California’s admission as a free state, territorial governments in lands from Mexico with no slavery restrictions, and slave trade was obliterated, but not slavery in the District of Columbia. There were…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several reasons highlighted behind the division, such as; states’ rights and disagreements over tariffs and the most influential issue about slavery (Tindall…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was made to settle issues between North and South about territory and slavery that was caused by the Mexican-American War. There were five bills made. The first bill was that California was a free state. The second state was that Texas would be paid compensation by the government for giving California and New Mexico up. The third bill was that New Mexico was a new state without any specific prohibition of slavery. The fourth bill was that there would be no slave trade in Washington DC. The fifth bill was that if a slave ran away, people would have to chase after it no matter what. Even though this was a compromise, the North and South didn’t really like it that much. Texas especially didn’t like it because they lost a lot of territory.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For a while this compromise allowed equality in Congress between the representation of slave state and free states, however, states that weren’t part of the Louisiana Territory started to be admitted as slave states; this caused a major national crisis. Having equality in representation meant that if the free states tried to pass a law that the slave states didn’t agree with, then the slave states could veto and stop them from being passed; and vice versa. In 1845, Florida and Texas both joined the United States as slave states. Slave states counted to a total of 15 and free states were at 13 until 1846. This created a national crisis due to the fact that the slave states were now in control of law making. Slave states would be able to create any law and be able to pass it with ease because they were the majority. The South was now in control of Congress, the Northerner’s biggest fear. By 1848, the states equaled in representation, but this ended by 1850 when California entered as a free state. After…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was primarily about the future of slavery in the new territories and the Union. Out of the Compromise of 1850 came “The Fugitive Slave Law”, which gave owners of escaped slaves the power and the resources to procure their escaped slaves. It constituted one of its provisions was controversial federal laws that intended to pacify the slaveholding south and enraged the Northern abolitionist and ultimately provoked the Civil War.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Civil War

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This portion of the act was proposed to appeal to the liking of the south. Although it may have appealed to the south it also stirred feelings in the north. The laws were not practical as they violated the slaves 6th amendment right to a trial by jury, also the slaves could not testify of their own behalf. Angered by this many states passes personal liberty laws which prohibit the imprisonment of the runaway slaves and permitted them a trial by jury. The push for the rights for African Americans and slaves as a whole led to an abolitionist movement to be sparked throughout the united states that opened up many northerners and southerners eyes to the harsh realities of slaver and how morally wrong it was. As these abolitionist feelings intensified so did the dispute over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the disputed territories of present day Kansa and Nebraska that were supposed to be settled in the compromise of…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 is one of the most important compromises in this history of the United States, maybe even the world. The Compromise of 1850 is made up of five bills passed in the United States of America in September 1850, and it terminated a four-year confrontation between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north concerning the position of territories gained during the time of the Mexican-American war which was in 1846-1848. The most important political ramification in the Compromise has to be the Fugitive Slave Act for numerous reasons. Many historians have argued that the Fugitive Slave Act was very obliging to the abolitionist cause, even though…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outcome of such was a laborious legislative encounter amongst Southern and Northern councils, the South claimed that Congress as well as the states did not require the authority to constitute against the territorial expansion of slavery. Recognizing that this sectional split could tear apart the country, Whigs and Democrats decided to come to an agreement that they felt would help avoid secession. The resulting Compromise of 1850 accepted California to be acknowledged as a free state, but strengthened the fugitive slave law and made no requirements for how other territories might address the slavery issue. This causing the Whigs to be incapable of successfully addressing the slavery issue after 1850. Their southern affiliates virtually all possessed slaves, though the northeastern Whigs represented entrepreneurs who respected national unity and a national economic system but really could care less about slavery.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First thing first, what is the compromise of 1850? The compromise of1850 was a set of five bills that eventually lead to the civil war. Its purpose was to keep away confrontation between the northern free slave states and the southern slave states and keep the nation united. The first bill consist of California being admitted to the union as a free state. The second bill allowed New Mexico and Utah settlers to vote on an issue. The third bill relied on Texas loosing New Mexico territory, but $10 million was received from the government for the loss. The slave trade in the district of Colombia was abolished which created the fourth bill. Last but not least the fifth bill passed a new Fugitive slave act.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This compromise made four decisions. First, the new land from Mexico, California, would be admitted as a free state. This is because Texas was a slave state and therefore there would still be an equal amount of both free and slave states. Second, the compromise came up with a boundary line between the United States and Mexico. Third, slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. Lastly, there would be laws set to make slaves return to the South if they every crossed over to the North.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When slavery was a big thing, the Union was divided into two groups. The slave states, and the free states. The anti-slavery and the pro-slavery. The north and the south. This made the Union fall apart, as people were getting…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromise led to social discord because not everyone agreed with every part of the compromise. Northerners, for example did not agree with the new Fugitive Slave Law, which could turn the North into one big hunting ground because the new law targeted recent fugitives and those who have left the South years earlier. Many northerners tried to warn fugitive slaves about the slave catchers (Doc C). Northerners did this because they believed that the new law was immoral. As Ralph Waldo Emerson stated in his address on the Fugitive Slave Law “An immoral law makes it a man’s duty to break it...” (Doc D). The South, however, did not like that California was admitted to the Union as a free state. This is because there was now an imbalance of Slave states (15) and Free states (16) in the country. (Doc A) This would give Free states the majority in Congress which could possibly mean that slavery could be prevented from expanding or could possibly be abolished completely. The second event that led to much social discord was the Kansas- Nebraska Act. The main goal of the Kansa-Nebraska Act was to make for railroad that…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays